Biomechanical criteria for evaluating prefabricated post-and-core systems: A guide for the restorative dentist

Quintessence International

Volumn 29, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 305-312

  Smith, Charles T ^a   Schuman, Norman J ^a   Wasson, Waletha ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Biomechanical criteria; Post and core system; Prefabricated post

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; TOOTH CEMENT;

BIOMECHANICS; CEMENTATION; CHEMISTRY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; REVIEW; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

BIOMECHANICS; CEMENTATION; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CEMENTS; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; HUMANS; POST AND CORE TECHNIQUE;

EID: 0032060140     PISSN: 00336572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (53)

1. Fredrick DR. An application of the dowel and composite resin technique. J Prosthet Dent 1974;32:420.
2. Tylman SD. Theory and Practice of Crown and Bridge Prosthesis, ed 2. St Louis: Mosby, 1947:1-13.
3. Ring ME. Dentistry, an Illustrated History. New York: Abradale-Mosby, 1992:160-179.
4. Silvers JE, Johnson WT. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth. Dent Clin North Am 1992;36:631-648.
5. Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Fujimoto J. Contemporary Fixed Prosthodontics, ed 2. St Louis: Mosby, 1995:238-262.
6. Shillingburg HT, Hobo S, Whitsett LD, Jacobi R, Brackett SE. Fundamentals of Fixed Prosthodontics, ed 3. Chicago: Quintessence, 1997:194-209.
7. Colman HL. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth. Dent Clin North Am 1979;23:647-661.
8. Ingle JI, Teel S, Wands DH. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth and preparation for overdentures. In: Ingle JI, Bakland LK (eds). Endodontics, ed 4. Malvern, PA: Williams & Wilkins 1994:876-920.
9. Sorensen JA, Martinoff JT. Intracoronal reinforcement and coronal coverage: A study of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1984;51:780-784.
10. Goerig AC, Mueninghoff LA. Management of the endodontically treated tooth. Part 1. Concept for restorative designs. J Prosthet Dent 1983;49:340-345.
11. Talbert KC, Conney JP. The endodontically treated tooth. Dent Clin North Am 1984;28:923-951.
12. Assif D, Avraham B, Pilo R, Oren E. Effect of post design on resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth with complete crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:36-40.
13. Morgano SM. Restoration of pulpless teeth: Application of traditional principles in present and future contexts. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:375-380.
14. Athey TH. Systematic Systems Approach. Prentice Hall, 1982: 68-100.
15. Jacobi R, Shillingburg HT. Pins, dowels, and other retentive devices in posterior teeth. Dent Clin North Am 1993;37:367-390.
16. Anusavice KJ. Structure of matter and principles of adhesion. In: Anusavice KJ (ed). Phillips' Science of Dental Materials, ed 10. Philadelphia, Saunders, 1996:13-31.
17. Standlee JP, Caputo AA, Hanson EC. Retention of endodontic dowels: Effect of cement, dowel length, diameter, and design. J Prosthet Dent 1978;39:401-405.
18. Ruemping DR, Lund MR, Schnell RJ. Retention of dowels subjected to tensile and torsional forces. J Prosthet Dent 1979; 41:159.
19. Johnson JK, Sakumura JS. Dowel form and tensile force. J Prosthet Dent 1978;40:645.
20. Standlee JP, Caputo AA, Holcomb J, Trabert KC. The retentive and stress-distributing properties of a threaded endodontic dowel. J Prosthet Dent 1980;44:398-403.
21. Chapman KW, Worley JL, von Fraunhofer JA. Retention of prefabricated posts by cements and resins. J Prosthet Dent 1985;54:649-652.
22. Tjan AHL, Whang SB. Resistance to root fracture of dowel channels with various thicknesses of buccal dentin walls. J Prosthet Dent 1985;53:496-500.
23. Burns DA, Krause WR, Douglas HB, Burns DR. Stress distribution surrounding endodontic posts. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64: 412-418.
24. Freedman G, Novak IM, Serota KS, Glassman GD. Intra-radicular rehabilitation: A clinical approach. Pract Periodont Aesthet Dent 1994;6:33-39.
25. Duret D, Duret F, Reynaud M. Long-life physical property preservation and prosthodontic rehabilitation with the compositpost. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1996;17:50-56.
26. Trushkowsky RD. Coronoradicular rehabilitation with a carbon-fiber post. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1996;17:74-79.
27. Luu KQ. Corrosion of a nonprecious metal post: A case report. Quintessence Int 1992;23:389-392.
28. Grayson WM. Dental amalgam: Structures and properties. In: Anusavice KJ (ed). Phillips' Science of Dental Materials, ed 10. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1996:361-365.
29. Sturdevant CM, Roberson TM, Heymann HO, Sturdevant JR. The Art and Science of Operative Dentistry, ed 3. St Louis: Mosby, 1995:246-248.
30. Mahler DB, Engle JH, Simms LE, Terkla LG. One-year clinical evaluation of bonded amalgam restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1996;127:345-349.
31. Belcher MA, Stewart GP. Two-year clinical evaluation of an amalgam adhesive. J Am Dent Assoc 1997;128:309-314.
32. Donald DL, Jeansonne BG, Gardiner DM, Sarkar NK. Influence of dentinal adhesives and a prefabricated post and fracture resistance of silver amalgam cores. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77:17-22.
33. Cohen BI, Pagnillo MK, Condos S, Deutsch AS. Four different core materials measured for fracture strength in combination with five different designs of endodontic posts. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76:487-495.
34. Kovarik RE, Breeding LC, Caughman WF. Fatigue life of three core materials under simulated chewing conditions. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:584-590.
35. Ziebert AJ, Dhuru VB. The fracture toughness of various core materials. J Prosthodont Dent 1995;4:33-37.
36. Christensen GJ. Compomers vs. resin-reinforced glass ionomers. J Am Dent Assoc 1997;128:479-480.
37. Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Comparative physico-mechanical characterization of new hybrid restorative materials with conventional glass-ionomer and resin composite restorative materials. J Dent Res 1997;76: 883-894.
38. Standlee JP, Caputo AA, Collard EW, Pollack MH. Analysis of stress distribution by endodontic posts. Oral Surg 1972;33: 952-960.
39. Shen C. Dental cements for bonding applications. In: Anusavice KJ (ed). Phillips' Science of Dental Materials, ed 10. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1996:555-580.
40. Christensen GJ. Cements used for full crown restorations: A survey of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry. J Esthet Dent 1997;9:20-26.
41. Mendoza DB, Eakle WS, Kahl EA. Root reinforcement with a resin-bonded preformed post. J Prosthet Dent 1997;98:10-14.
42. Standlee JP, Caputo AA. Endodontic dowel retention with resinous cements. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:913-917.
43. Tjan AH, Grant BE, Dunn JR. Microleakage of composite resin cores treated with various dentin bonding systems. J Prosthet Dent 1991;66:24-29.
44. White SN, Yu Z, Kipnis V. Effect of adhesive luting agents on the marginal seating of cast restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1993; 69:28-31.
45. White SN, Yu Z, Kipnis V. Effect of sealing forces on film thickness of new adhesive resin cements. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 68:476-481.
46. White SN, Kipnis V. Effect of adhesive luting agents on marginal seating of cast restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:28-31.
47. Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Fujtmoto J. Contemporary Fixed Prosthodontics, ed 2. St Louis: Mosby, 1995:618-630.
48. McLean JW. Dentinal bonding agents versus glass-ionomer cements. Quintessence Int 1996;27:659-667.
49. Rauschenberger CR. Dentin permeability. Dent Clin North Am 1992;36:527-542.
50. Tjan AHL, Chiu J. Microleakage of core materials for complete cast gold crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:659-664.
51. Diaz-Arnold AM, Wilcox LR. Restoration of endodontically treated anterior teeth: An evaluation of coronal microleakage of glass ionomer and composite resin materials.
52. Fogel HM. Microleakage of posts used to restore endodontically treated teeth. J Endod 1995;21:376-379.
53. White SN, Sorensen JA, Kang SK, Caputo AA. Microleakage of new crown and fixed partial denture luting agents. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:156-161.