The retentive effects of pre-fabricated posts by luting cements

Journal of Oral Rehabilitation

Volumn 31, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 585-589

  Sen, D ^a   Poyrazoglu, E ^a   Tuncelli, B ^a  

^a ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Bonding; Luting cements; Pre fabricated posts

Indexed keywords

RESIN CEMENT; TOOTH CEMENT; ZINC PHOSPHATE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTIN; ENAMEL; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INCISOR; TENSILE STRENGTH; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH ROOT CANAL;

BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; COMPOSITE RESINS; CROWNS; DENTAL CEMENTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS RETENTION; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; HUMANS; INCISOR; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACIDS; POST AND CORE TECHNIQUE; RESIN CEMENTS; TENSILE STRENGTH;

EID: 3042520521     PISSN: 0305182X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01276.x     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Hanson EC, Caputo AA. Cementing mediums and retentive characteristics of dowels. J Prosthet Dent. 1974;32:551-557.
2. Standlee JP, Caputo AA, Hanson EC. Retention of endodontic dowels: effect of cement, dowel length, and design. J Prosthet Dent. 1978;39:400-405.
3. Chapman KW, Worley JL, Fraunhofer JA. Retention of prefabricated posts by cements and resins. J Prosthet Dent. 1985;54:649-652.
4. Deutsch AS, Musikant BL, Cavallari J, Bernardi S. Retentive properties of a new post and core system. J Prosthet Dent. 1985;53:12-14.
5. Brown JD, Mitchem JC. Retentive properties of dowel post systems. Oper Dent. 1987;12:15-19.
6. Burgess JO, Summit JB, Robbins JW. The resistance to tensile, compression, and torsional forces provided by four post systems. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;68:899-903.
7. Milot P, Stein S. Root fracture in endodontically treated teeth related to post selection and crown design. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;68:428-435.
8. Kahn FH, Rosenberg PA, Schulman A, Pines M. Comparison of fatigue for three prefabricated threaded post systems. J Prosthet Dent. 1996;75:148-153.
9. Fernandes AQ, Dessai GS. Factors affecting the fracture resistance of post core reconstructed teeth: a review. Int J Prosthod. 2001;14:56-64.
10. Johnson JK, Sakumura JS. Dowel form and tensile force. J Prosthet Dent. 1978;39:645-649.
11. Millstein PL, Yu H, Hsu CS, Nathanson D. Effects of cementing on retention of a prefabricated screw post. J Prosthet Dent. 1987;57:171-174.
12. Cohen BI, Musikant BL, Deutsch AS. Comparison of the retentive properties of two hollow-tube post systems to those of a solid post design. J Prosthet Dent. 1993;70: 234-238.
13. Cohen BI, Condos S, Musikant BL, Deutsch AS. Pilot study comparing the photoelastic stress distribution for four endodontic post systems. J Oral Rehabil. 1996;23:679-685.
14. Duncan JP, Pameijer CH. Retention of parallel-sided titanium posts cemented with six luting cements. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;80:423-428.
15. Assif D, Gorfil C. Biomechanical consideration in restoring endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1994;71:565-567.
16. Tjan AHL, Whang SB. Resistance to root fracture of dowel channels with various thicknesses. J Prosthet Dent. 1985;53:496-500.
17. Cohen BI, Pagnillo MK, Newman I, Musikant BL, Deutsch AS. Retention of endodontic posts cemented with dental cements. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;79:520-525.
18. Nissan J, Dimitry Y, Assif D. The use of reinforced composite resin cement as compensation for reduced post length. J Prosthet Dent. 2001;86:304-308.
19. Assif D, Ferber A. Retention of dowels using a composite resin as a cementing medium. J Prosthet Dent. 1982;48: 292-296.