Factors determining post selection: A literature review

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Volumn 90, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 556-562

  Fernandes, Aquaviva S ^a,c   Shetty, Sharat ^b   Coutinho, Ivy ^a  

^a India   (India)

^b Department of Prosthodontics   (India)

^c Sebastian Villa   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; CARBON FIBER; DENTAL ALLOY; GLASS FIBER; TITANIUM; ZINC PHOSPHATE; ZIRCONIUM DERIVATIVE;

ANATOMY; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CERAMICS; CHEMICAL BOND; CORROSION; DEVICE; ENDODONTICS; ESTHETICS; HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE; MEDLINE; ODONTOMETRY; PEER REVIEW; REPARATIVE DENTISTRY; REVIEW; STRESS; SURVIVAL; TOOTH; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH ROOT; TOOTH ROOT CANAL; TORQUE;

EID: 0347480522     PISSN: 00223913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2003.09.006     Document Type: Review

References (81)

1. Turner C.H. The utilization of roots to carry post-retained crowns. J Oral Rehabil. 9:1982;193-202.
2. Shillingburg H.T., Hobo S., Whitsett L., Brackett S. Fundamentals of fixed prosthodontics. 3rd ed :1997;Quintessence, Chicago.
3. Baraban D.J. The restoration of endodontically treated teeth an update . J Prosthet Dent. 59:1988;553-558.
4. Sorensen J.A., Engelman M.J. Effect of post adaptation on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 64:1990;419-424.
5. Holmes D.C., Diaz-Arnold A.M., Leary J.M. Influence of post dimension on stress distribution in dentin. J Prosthet Dent. 75:1996;140-147.
6. Hirshfeld Z., Stern N. Post and core - the biomechanical aspect. Aust Dent J. 17:1972;467-468.
7. Davy D.T., Dilley G.L., Krejci R.F. Determination of stress patterns in root-filled teeth incorporating various dowel designs. J Dent Res. 60:1981;1301-1310.
8. Standlee J.P., Caputo A.A., Hanson E.C. Retention of endodontic dowels effect of cement, dowel length, diameter and design . J Prosthet Dent. 39:1978;400-405.
9. Standlee J.P., Caputo A.A., Collard E.W., Pollack M.H. Analysis of stress distribution by endodontic posts. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 33:1972;952-960.
10. Mattison G.D., Delivanis P.D., Thacker R.W. Jr, Hassel K.J. Effect of post preparation on the apical seal. J Prothet Dent. 51:1984;785-789.
11. Kvist T., Rydin E., Reit C. The relative frequency of periapical lesions in teeth with root canal -retained posts. J Endod. 15:1989;578-580.
12. Nissan J., Dmitry Y., Assif D. The use of reinforced composite resin cement as compensation for reduced post length. J Prosthet Dent. 86:2001;304-308.
13. Gluskin A.H., Radke R.A., Frost S.L., Watanabe L.G. The mandibular incisor rethinking guidelines for post and core design . J Endod. 21:1995;33-37.
14. Ash M Jr. Wheeler's dental anatomy, physiology and occlusion. 7th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1993 p. 170-217,274-331.
15. Frommer HH. Radiology for dental auxiliaries. 6th ed. St Louis: Mosby; 1996. p. 265-6.
16. Gutmann J.L. The dentin- root complex anatomic and biologic considerations in restoring endodontically treated teeth . J Prosthet Dent. 67:1992;458-467.
17. Akkayan B., Gulmez T. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post systems. J Prosthet Dent. 87:2002;431-437.
18. Trabert K.C., Caputo A.A., Abou-Rass M. Tooth fracture-a comparison of endodontic and restorative treatments. J Endod. 4:1978;341-345.
19. Tilk M.A., Lommel T.J., Gerstein H. A study of mandibular and maxillary root widths to determine dowel size. J Endod. 5:1979;79-82.
20. Mattison G.D. Photoelastic stress analysis of cast gold endodontic posts. J Prosthet Dent. 48:1982;407-411.
21. Pilo R., Tamse A. Residual dentin thickness in mandibular pre-molars prepared with gates glidden and ParaPost drills. J Prosthet Dent. 83:2000;617-623.
22. Lloyd P.M., Palik J.F. The philosophies of dowel diameter preparation a literature review . J Prosthet Dent. 69:1993;32-36.
23. Stern N., Hirshfeld Z. Principles of preparing endodontically treated teeth for dowel and core restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 30:1973;162-165.
24. Halle E.B., Nicholls J.I., Hassel H.J. An in-vitro comparison of retention between a hollow post and core and a custom hollow post and core. J Endod. 10:1984;96-100.
25. Smith C.T., Schuman N. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth a guide for the restorative dentist . Quintessence Int. 28:1997;457-462.
26. Craig R.G., Farah J.W. Stress analysis and design of single restoration and fixed bridges. Oral Sci Rev. 10:1977;45-74.
27. Cohen B.I., Pagnillo M.K., Condos S., Deutsch A.S. Four different core materials measured for fracture strength in combination with five different designs of endodontic posts. J Prosthet Dent. 76:1996;487-495.
28. Saupe W.A., Gluskin A.H., Radke R.A. Jr. A comparative study of fracture resistance between morphologic dowel and cores and a resin-reinforced dowel system in the intraradicular restoration of structurally compromised roots. Quintessence Int. 27:1996;483-491.
29. Tjan A.H., Whang S.B. Resistance to root fracture of dowel channels with various thicknesses of buccal dentin walls. J Prosthet Dent. 53:1985;496-500.
30. Morgano S.M., Milot P. Clinical success of cast metal posts and cores. J Prosthet Dent. 70:1993;11-16.
31. Sorensen J.A., Martinoff J.T. Intra-coronal reinforcement and coronal coverage a study of endodontically treated teeth . J Prosthet Dent. 51:1984;780-784.
32. Barkhordar R.A., Radke R., Abbasi J. Effect of metal collars on resistance of endodontically treated teeth to root fracture. J Prosthet Dent. 61:1989;676-678.
33. Sidoli G.E., King P.A., Setchell D.J. An in vitro evaluation of a carbon fiber based post and core system. J Prosthet Dent. 78:1997;5-9.
34. Stockton L.W., Williams P.T. Retention and shear bond strength of two post systems. Oper Dent. 24:1999;210-216.
35. Bergman B., Lundquist P., Sjogren U., Sundquist G. Restorative and endodontic results after treatment with cast posts and cores. J Prosthet Dent. 61:1989;10-15.
36. Rosenstiel SR, Land MF, Fujimoto J. Contemporary fixed prosthodontics. 3rd ed. New Delhi: Harcourt (India) Pvt Ltd; 2001. p. 273-312.
37. Burgess J.O., Summitt J.B., Robbins J.W. The resistance to tensile, compression and torsional forces provided by four post systems. J Prosthet Dent. 68:1992;899-903.
38. Cohen B.I., Pagnillo M.K., Condos S., Deutsch A.S. Comparison of the torsional failure for seven endodontic post systems. J Prosthet Dent. 74:1995;350-357.
39. Cohen B.I., Pagnillo M.K., Newman I., Musikant B.L., Deutsch A.S. Effect of three bonding systems on torsional resistance of titanium-reinforced composite cores supported by two post designs. J Prosthet Dent. 81:1999;678-683.
40. Turner C.H. Cement distribution during post cementation. J Dent. 9:1981;231-239.
41. Peters M.C., Poort H.W., Farah J.W., Craig R.C. Stress analysis of a tooth restored with a post and core. J Dent Res. 62:1983;760-763.
42. Fernandes A.S., Dessai G.S. Factors affecting the fracture resistance of post-core reconstructed teeth a review . Int J Prosthodont. 14:2001;355-363.
43. Anusavice KJ. Phillip's science of dental materials.10th ed. New Delhi: Harcourt (Asia) Pvt Ltd; 1999. p. 13-31, 555-80.
44. Cohen S, Burns RC. Pathways of the pulp. 2nd ed. Harcourt (India) Pvt Ltd; 2002. p. 765-95,898-903.
45. Stockton L. Factors affecting retention of post system a literature review . J Prosthet Dent. 81:1999;380-385.
46. Musikant B.L., Deutsch A.S. A new prefabricated post and core system. J Prosthet Dent. 52:1984;631-634.
47. Standlee J.P., Caputo A.A. The retentive and stress distributing properties of split threaded endodontic dowels. J Prosthet Dent. 68:1992;436-442.
48. Standlee J.P., Caputo A.A., Holcomb J., Trabert K.C. The retentive and stress distributing properties of a threaded endodontic dowel. J Prosthet Dent. 44:1980;398-404.
49. Zmener O. Adaptation of threaded dowels to dentin. J Prosthet Dent. 45:1980;530-535.
50. Johnson J.K., Sakamura J.S. Dowel form and tensile force. J Prosthet Dent. 40:1978;645-649.
51. Cooney J.P., Caputo A.A., Trabert K.C. Retention and stress distribution of tapered end endodontic posts. J Prosthet Dent. 55:1986;540-546.
52. Ross R.S., Nicholls J.I., Harrington G.W. A comparison of strains generated during placement of five endodontic posts. J Endod. 17:1991;450-456.
53. Cohen B.I., Musikant B.L., Deutsch A.S. Comparison of the photoelastic stress for a split-shank threaded post versus a threaded post. J Prosthodont. 3:1994;53-55.
54. Creuger N.H., Mentink A.G., Kayser A.F. An analysis of durability data on post and core restorations. J Dent. 21:1993;281-284.
55. Standlee J.P., Caputo A.A., Holcomb J.P. The Dentatus screw comparative stress analysis with other endontic dowel designs . J Oral Rehabil. 9:1982;23-33.
56. Deutsch A.S., Musikant B.L., Cavallari J., Ledley J.B. Prefabricated dowels a literature review . J Prosthet Dent. 49:1983;498-503.
57. Fredriksson M., Astback J., Pamenius M., Arvidson K. A retrospective study of 236 patients with teeth restored by carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts. J Prosthet Dent. 80:1998;151-157.
58. Assif D., Oren E., Marshak B.L., Aviv I. Photoelastic analysis of stress transfer by endodontically treated teeth to the supporting structure using different restorative techniques. J Prosthet Dent. 61:1989;535-543.
59. King P.A., Setchell D.J. An in vitro evaluation of a prototype CFRC prefabricated post developed for the restoration of pulpless teeth. J Oral Rehabil. 17:1990;599-609.
60. Brandal J.L., Nicholls J.I., Harrington G.W. A comparison of three restorative techniques for endodontically treated anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 58:1987;161-165.
61. Asmussen E., Peutzfeldt A., Heitmann T. Stiffness, elastic limit, and strength of newer types of endodontic posts. J Dent. 27:1999;275-278.
62. Ichikawa Y., Akagawa Y., Nikai H., Tsuru H. Tissue compatibility and stability of new zirconia ceramic in vivo. J Prosthet Dent. 68:1992;322-326.
63. Petersen K.B. Longitudinal root fracture due to corrosion of an endodontic post. J Can Dent Assoc. 2:1971;66-68.
64. Angmar-Mansson B., Omnell K.A., Rud J. Root fracture due to corrosion.1. Metallurgical aspects. Odontol Revy. 20:1969;245-265.
65. Luu K.Q., Walker R.T. Corrosion of a nonprecious metal post a case report . Qiuntessence Int. 23:1992;389-392.
66. Jacobi R., Shillingburg H.T. Jr. Pins, dowels and other retentive devices in posterior teeth. Dent Clin North Am. 37:1993;367-390.
67. Plasmans P.J., Welle P.R., Vrijhoef M.M. In vitro resistance of composite resin dowel and cores. J Endod. 14:1988;300-304.
68. Standlee J.P., Caputo A.A. Endodontic dowel retention with resinous cement. J Prosthet Dent. 68:1992;913-917.
69. Mannocci E., Ferrari M., Watson T.F. Intermittent loading of teeth restored using quartz fiber, carbon-quartz fiber and zirconium dioxide ceramic root canal posts. J Adhes Dent. 1:1999;153-158.
70. Cohen B.I., Condos S., Deutsch A.S., Musikant B.L. Fracture strength of three different core materials in combination with three different endodontic posts. Int J Prosthodont. 7:1994;178-182.
71. Lewis R., Smith B.G. A clinical survey of failed post retained crowns. Br Dent J. 165:1988;95-97.
72. Hunter A.J., Flood A.M. The restoration of endodontically treated teeth. Part 3. Cores. Aust Dent J. 34:1989;115-121.
73. Thayer K.E. Fixed prosthodontics. 1984;284 Mosby, Chicago.
74. Chang W.C., Millstein P.L. Effect of post design of prefabricated post heads on core materials. J Prosthet Dent. 69:1993;475-482.
75. Cohen B.1, Pagnillo M.K., Newman I., Musikant B.L., Deutsch A.S. Retention of a core material supported by three post head designs. J Prosthet Dent. 83:2000;624-628.
76. Freedman G.A. Esthetic post and core treatment. Dent Clin North Am. 45:2001;03-16.
77. Wilson N.H.F., Setcos J.C., Dummer P.M.H., Gorman D.G., Hopwood W.A., Saunders W.P., et al. A split-shank prefabricated post system A critical multidisciplinary review . Quintessence Int. 28:1997;737-743.
78. Cohen B.I., Musikant B.L., Deutsch A.S. Comparison of retention properties of four post systems. J Prosthet Dent. 68:1992;264-268.
79. Tamse A. Iatrogenic vertical root fracture in endodontically treated teeth. Endod Dent Traumatol. 4:1988;190-196.
80. Vichi A., Ferrari M., Davidson C.L. Influence of ceramic and cement thickness on the masking of various types of opaque posts. J Prosthet Dent. 83:2000;412-417.
81. Hochstedler J., Huband M., Poillion C. Porcelain-fused-to-metal post and core an esthetic alternative . J Dent Technol. 13:1996;26-29.