In which regions do universities patent and publish more?

Scientometrics

Volumn 70, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 251-266

  Azagra Caro, Joaquín M ^a   Archontakis, Fragiskos ^a   Yegros Yegros, Alfredo ^a  

^a INGENIO CSIC UPV Technical University of Valencia   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846379864     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-007-0202-9     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. ADAMS, J. D., Z. GRILICHES (2000), Research productivity in a system of universities. In: ENCAOUA D., B. H. HALL, F. LAISNEY, J. MAIRESSE (Eds), The Economics and Econometrics of Innovation. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
2. AGRAWAL, A., R. HENDERSON (2002), Putting patents in context: Exploring knowledge transfer from MIT. Management Science, 48 (1) : 44-60.
3. AZAGRA-CARO, J., I. FERNÁNDEZ-DE- LUCIO, A. GUTIÉRREZ-GRACIA (2003), University patents: Output and input indicators... of what? Research Evaluation, 12 (1) : 5-16.
4. AZAGRA-CARO, J., N. CARAYOL, P. LLERENA (2006a), Patent production at a European research university: Exploratory evidence at the laboratory level. Journal of Technology Transfer, 31 (2) : 257-268.
5. AZAGRA-CARO, J., A. YEGROS-YEGROS, F. ARCHONTAKIS (2006b), What do university patent routes indicate at regional level? Scientometrics 66 (1) : 219-230.
6. BALDINI, N., R. GRIMALDI, M. SOBRERO (2004), Institutional Changes and the Commercialization of Academic Knowledge: a Study of Italian Universities Patenting Activities Between 1965 and 2002, CRESCO Working Paper 11.
7. BERCOVITZ, J., M. FELDMAN (2003), Technology Transfer and the Academic Department: Who Participates and Why? DRUID Summer 2003 Conference, Copenhagen (Denmark), June 12-14.
8. BONACCORSI, A., C. DARAIO (2003), Age effects in scientific productivity: The case of the Italian National Research Council (CNR). Scientometrics, 58 (1) : 49-90.
9. BONACCORSI, A., C. DARAIO (2005), Exploring size and agglomeration effects on public research productivity. Scientometrics 63 (1) : 87-120.
10. BRESCHI, S., F. LISSONI, F. MONTOBBIO (2005), From publishing to patenting. Do productive scientists turn into academic inventors? Revue d'Économie Industrielle, 110 : 75-102.
11. CALDERINI, M., C. FRANZONI, A. VEZZULLI (2004), Scientific eminence, quality of research and the decision to patent in academic career. An event history analysis. Conference on Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Growth, Royal Institute of Technology Studies, Stockholm, 18-20 November.
12. CARAYOL, N., M. MATT (2004), Does research organization influence academic production? Laboratory evidence from a large European university. Research Policy, 33 : 1081-1102.
13. CARLSSON, B., A. C. FRIDH (2002), Technology transfer in the United States universities. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 12 : 199-232.
14. CESARONI, F., A. PICCALUGA (2002), Patenting activities of European Universities. Relevant? Growing? Useful? SPRU NPRnet Conference Rethinking Science Policy. Brighton (UK), 21-23 March.
15. CLARK, B. R. (1998), Creating Entrepreneurial Universities. Guilford: IUA Press, Pergamon.
16. COOKE, P. (1992), Regional innovation systems: Competitive regulation in new Europe. Geoforum, 23 (3) : 365-382.
17. COUPÉ, T. (2003), Science is golden: Academic R&D and university patents. Journal of Technology Transfer, 28 : 31-46.
18. CORONADO GUERRERO, D., M. ACOSTA SERÓ, R. MARÍN MUÑOZ (2003), La contribución de la universidad al desarrollo de la tecnología industrial. Diferencias sectoriales, regionales y factores determinantes. XXIX Reunión de estudios regionales, Santander, 27-28 de noviembre.
19. CRESPI, G., A. GEUNA (2005), Modelling and Measuring Scientific Production: Results for a Panel of OECD Countries. SPRU Electronic Working Paper Series, Paper No. 133.
20. DASGUPTA, P., P. DAVID (1994), Towards a new economics of science. Research Policy, 23 (5) : 487-521.
21. DURÁN ROMERO, G., dir., (2003), Análisis y comparación de las patentes universitarias españolas como indicador de resultados del esfuerzo investigador, Madrid: Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte.
22. ETZKOWITZ, H. (1998), The norms of entrepreneurial science: cognitive effects of the new university-industry linkages. Research Policy, 27 : 823-833.
23. ETZKOWITZ, H., L. LEYDESDORFF (2000), The dynamics of innovation: From National Systems and "Mode 2" to a Triple Helix of academic-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 26 : 109-123.
24. FELLER, I. (1990), Universities as engines of R&D-based economic growth: They think they can. Research Policy, 19 : 335-348.
25. FERNÁNDEZ DE CÓRDOBA, S. (1996), Derecho de patentes e investigación científica. Valencia: Tirant Lo Blanch.
26. FOLTZ, J., B. BARHAM, K. KIM (2000.), Universities and agricultural biotechnology patent production. Agribusiness, 16 (1) : 82-95.
27. FOLTZ, J., K. KIM, B. BARHAM (2001), A Dynamic Count Data Analysis of University Ag-Biotech Patents. Food Marketing Policy Center Research Report 56.
28. GEUNA, A. (1999), The Economics of Knowledge Production. Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar.
29. GREENE, W. H. (1994), Accounting for Excess Zeros and Sample Selection in Poisson and Negative Binomial Regression Models. Working paper EC-94-10, Stern School of Business, NYU.
30. GRILICHES, Z. (1979), Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth. Bell Journal of Economics, 10 : 92-116.
31. HENDERSON, R., A. B. JAFFE, M. TRAJTENBERG (1998), Universities as a source of commercial technology: A detailed analysis of University Patenting, 1965-1988. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80 (1) : 119-127.
32. MEYER, M. (2005), Inventor-Authors: Knowledge Integrators or Weak Links? Institute of Strategy and International Business Working Paper 2005/1.
33. MEYER, M. (2006), Measuring science-technology interaction in the knowledge-driven economy. Scientometrics, 66 (2) : 425-439.
34. MEYER-KRAHMER, F., U. SCHMOCH (1998), Science-based technologies: university-industry interactions in four fields. Research Policy, 27 : 835-851.
35. MOWERY, D. C., B. N. SAMPAT (2001), University patents and patent policy debates in the USA, 1925-1980. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10 (3) : 781-814.
36. MOWERY, D. C., A. A. ZIEDONIS (2002), Academic patent quality before and after the Bayh-Dole act in the United States. Research Policy, 31: 399-418.
37. OECD (2002), Main Science and Technology Indicators. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
38. OKUBO, Y. (1997), Bibliometric Indicators and Analysis of Research Systems: Methods and Examples. OECD: STI Working Papers 1997/1.
39. PAVITT, K. (1998), Do patents reflect the useful research output of universities? Research Evaluation, 7 (2) : 105-111.
40. PAYNE, A. A., A. Slow (2003). Does federal research funding increase university research output? Advances in Economic Analysis & Policy, 3 (1) : Article 1.
41. RODRÍGUEZ-SAN PEDRO, L. E. (2004), Las Universidades hispanas en su contexto histórico. http://www.universia.es/contenidos/universidades/historia/ Universidades_historia.htm
42. SIEGEL, D., D. WALDMAN, A. LINK (2003), Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the productivity of university technology transfer offices: an exploratory study. Research Policy, 32 : 27-48.
43. STEPHAN, P. (1996), The economics of science. Journal of Economic Literature, 34 (3) : 1199-1235.
44. THURSBY, J. G., S. KEMP (2002), Growth and productive efficiency of university intellectual property licensing. Research Policy, 31 : 109-124.
45. XIE, Y., K. A. SHAUMAN (1998), Sex differences in research productivity revisited: New evidence about an old puzzle. American Sociological Review, 63 : 847-870.