What do university patent routes indicate at regional level?

Scientometrics

Volumn 66, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 219-230

  Azagra Caro, Joaquín M ^a,b   Yegros Yegros, Alfredo ^a   Archontakis, Fragiskos ^a  

^a CSIC   (Spain)

^b INGENIO CSIC UPV Technical University of Valencia   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 30744473698     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-006-0015-2     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. ADAMS, J. D., Z. GRILICHES (2000): Research productivity in a system of universities, In: ENCAOUA D., B. H. HALL., F. LAISNEY, J. MATRESSE (Eds): The Economics and Econometrics of Innovation, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
2. AGRAWAL, A., R. HENDERSON (2002): Putting patents in context: Exploring knowledge transfer from MIT, Management Science, 48 (1) : 44-60.
3. AZAGRA-CARO, J., I. FERNÁNDEZ-DE-LUCIO, A. GUTIÉRREZ-GRACIA (2003): University patents: output and input indicators... of what? Research Evaluation, 12 (1) : 5-16.
4. AZAGRA-CARO, J., N. CARAYOL, P. LLERENA (2005): Patent production at a European research university: Exploratory evidence at the laboratory level, Journal of Technology Transfer, forthcoming.
5. CARLSSON, B., A. C. FRIDH (2002): Technology transfer in the United States universities, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 12 : 199-232.
6. CESARONI, F., A. PICCALUGA (2002): Patenting activities of European Universities. Relevant? Growing? Useful? SPRU NPRnet Conference "Rethinking Science Policy". Brighton (UK), 21-23 March.
7. CLARK, B. R. (1998): Creating Entrepreneurial Universities, Guilford: IUA Press, Pergamon.
8. COUPÉ, T. (2003): Science is golden: Academic R&D and university patents, Journal of Technology Transfer, 28:31-46.
9. DASGUPTA, P., P. DAVID (1994): Towards a new economics of science, Research Policy, 23 (5) : 487-521.
10. ETZKOWITZ, H. (1998): The norms of entrepreneurial science: cognitive effects of the new university-industry linkages, Research Policy, 27 : 823-833.
11. FOLTZ, J., B. BARHAM, K. KIM (2000): Universities and agricultural biotechnology patent production, Agribusiness, 16 (1) : 82-95.
12. FOLTZ, J., K. KIM, B. BARHAM (2001): A dynamic count data analysis of university ag-biotech patents, Food Marketing Policy Center Research Report, 56.
13. GEUNA, A. (1999): The Economics of Knowledge Production, Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar.
14. HENDERSON, R., A. B. JAFFE, M. TRAJTENBERG (1998): Universities as a source of commercial technology: A detailed analysis of university patenting, 1965-1988, Review of Economics and Statistics, 80 (1): 119-127.
15. th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, Leiden 23-25 September 2004.
16. MEYER-KRAHMER, F., U. SCHMOCH (1998): Science-based technologies: university-industry interactions in four fields, Research Policy, 27 : 835-851.
17. MOWERY, D. C., B. N. SAMPAT (2001): University patents and patent policy debates in the USA, 1925-1980, Industrial and Corporate Change, 10 (3) : 781-814.
18. MOWERY, D. C., A. A. ZIEDONIS (2002): Academic patent quality before and after the Bayh-Dole act in the United States, Research Policy, 31 : 399-418.
19. PAVITT, K. (1984): Sectoral patterns of technical change: Towards a taxonomy and a theory, Research Policy, 13 : 343-373.
20. PAYNE, A. A., A. SIOW (2003): Does federal research funding increase university research output? Advances in Economic Analysis & Policy, 3 (1) : Article 1.
21. RODRÍGUEZ-SAN PEDRO, L. E. (2004): Las Universidades hispanas en su contexte histórico, http://www.universia.es/contenidos/universidades/ historia/Universidades_historia.htm
22. SCOTT, A., G. STEYN, A. GEUNA, S. BRUSONI, E. STEINMUELLER (2002): The Economic Returns to Basic Research and the Benefits of University-Industry Relationships: A Literature Review and Update of Findings, SPRU: Report for the Office of Science and Technology.