University patents: Output and input indicators ... of what?

Research Evaluation

Volumn 12, Issue 1 SPEC ISS., 2003, Pages 5-16

  Caro, Joaquín M Azagra ^a   Fernández De Lucio, Ignacio ^a   Gracia, Antonio Gutiérrez ^a  

^a INGENIO CSIC UPV Technical University of Valencia   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1542609198     PISSN: 09582029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3152/147154403781776744     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. J D Adams and Z Griliches (1996), 'Research productivity in a system of universities', NBER Working Paper Series 5833.
2. M Balconi, S Breschi and F Lissoni (2002), 'Networks of inventors and the location of university research: an exploration of Italian data', presented at the conference Rethinking Science Policy, SPRU, University of Sussex, Brighton, 21-23 March.
3. M Beise and H Stahl (1999), 'Public research and industrial innovations in Germany', Research Policy, 28(4), pages 397-422.
4. B Carlsson and A C Fridh (2002), 'Technology transfer in the United States universities', Journal of Evolutionary Economics 12, pages 199-232.
5. F Cesaroni and A Piccaluga (2002), 'Patenting activities of European universities. Relevant? Growing? Useful?', presented at the conference Rethinking Science Policy, SPRU, University of Sussex, Brighton, 21-23 March.
6. B R Clark (1998), Creating Entrepreneurial Universities (Guilford: IUA Press, Pergamon).
7. T Coupé (2001), 'Science is golden: academic R&D and university patents', Proceedings of the conference Innovations and Intellectual Property: Economic and Managerial Perspectives. Brussels, November 22-23.
8. CTT (1992), Memoria de actividades (Valencia: Universidad Politécnica de Valencia).
9. P Dasgupta and P A David (1994), Towards a new economics of science', Research Policy, 23(5), pages 487-521.
10. H Etzkowitz (1998), 'The norms of entrepreneurial science: cognitive effects of the new university-industry linkages', Research Policy, 27, pages 823-833.
11. H Etzkowitz and L Leydesdorff (2000), 'The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and "mode 2" to a triple helix of academic-industry-government relations', Research Policy, 26, pages 109-123.
12. I Fernández de Lucio and J Nieto (1998), 'La Universidad Politécnica de Valencia: España', in A. Campo Cabal and H. Yesid Bernaj (editors), Interacción universidad - sector productive (Bogotá: CAB).
13. J Foltz, B Barham and K Kim (2000), 'Universities and agricultural biotechnology patent production', Agribusiness, 16(1), pages 82-95.
14. J Foltz, K Kim and B Barham (2001), 'A dynamic count data analysis of university ag-biotech patents', Food Marketing Policy Center Research Report 56.
15. A Geuna (1999), The Economics of Knowledge Production (Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar).
16. M Gibbons, C Limoges, H Nowotny, S Schwartzman, P Scoot and M Trow (1994), The New Production of Knowledge (Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar).
17. J Hausman, B H Hall and Z Griliches (1984), 'Econometric models for count data with an application to the patents - R&D relationship', Econometrics 52(4), pages 909-938.
18. R Henderson, A B Jaffe and M Trajtenberg (1998), 'Universities as a source of commercial technology: a detailed analysis of university patenting, 1965-1988', Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(1), pages 119-27.
19. P B Joly and V Mangematin (1996), 'Profile of public laboratories, industrial partnerships and organization of R&D: the dynamics of industrial relationships in a large research organization', Research Policy, 25, pages 901-922.
20. Y S Lee (1996), Technology transfer and the research university: a search for the boundaries of university-industry collaboration', Research Policy, 25, pages 843-863.
21. F Meyer-Krahmer and U Schmoch (1998), 'Science-based technologies: university-industry interactions in four fields', Research Policy, 27(8), pages 835-51.
22. D C Mowery, R R Nelson, B N Sampat and A A Ziedonis (2001), 'The effects of patenting and licensing by US universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980', Research Policy, 30, pages 99-119.
23. D C Mowery and B N Sampat (2001), 'Patenting and licensing university inventions: lessons from the history of the research corporation', Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(2), pages 317-355.
24. D C Mowery and A A Ziedonis (2002), 'Academic patent quality before and after the Bayh-Dole act in the United States', Research Policy, 31, pages 399-418.
25. R R Nelson, (2001), 'Observations on the post-Bayh-Dole rise in university patenting', Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1/2), pages 13-19.
26. A Pakes and Z Griliches (1984), 'Patents and R&D at the firm level: a first look', in Z Griliches (editor), R&D, Patents and Productivity (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press), ch. 3.
27. K Pavitt (1998). 'Do patents reflect the useful research output of universities?', Research Evaluation, 7(2), pages 105-111.
28. A A Payne and A Siow (1999), 'Does federal research funding increase university research output?', IGPA Working Paper 74.
29. A Piccaluga (2001), La valorizzazione della ricerca scientifica (Milano: Franco Angeli).
30. B Rappert, A Webster and D Charles (1999), 'Making sense of diversity and reluctance: academic-industrial relations and intellectual property', Research Policy, 28, pages 873-890.
31. A J Salter and B R Martin (2001), 'The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: a critical review', Research Policy, 30(3), pages 509-532.
32. M Schmiemann and J N Durvy (2001), 'New approaches to technology transfer from publicly funded research', Proceedings of the conference Innovations and Intellectual Property: Economic and Managerial Perspectives, Brussels, November 22-23.
33. J Thursby and L Kemp (2002), 'Growth and productive efficiency of university intellectual property licensing', Research Policy, 31, pages 109-124.
34. J T Wallmark (1998), 'Innovations and patents at universities: the case of Chalmers University of Technology', Technovation, 17(3), pages 127-39.