A review of breast ultrasound

Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 113-123

  Sehgal, Chandra M ^a   Weinstein, Susan P ^a   Arger, Peter H ^a   Conant, Emily F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Neoplasm; Sonography; Ultrasound imaging

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ARTIFACT REDUCTION; B SCAN; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; BREAST CYST; BREAST TUMOR; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER SYSTEM; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; DOPPLER ECHOGRAPHY; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; ELASTOGRAPHY; ELECTRONICS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY; MAMMOGRAPHY; PROCESS DEVELOPMENT; RADIOLOGICAL PROCEDURES; REVIEW; SIGNAL PROCESSING; TUMOR BLOOD FLOW; TUMOR VASCULARIZATION; ULTRASOUND TRANSDUCER;

BIOPSY, NEEDLE; BREAST; BREAST DISEASES; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CONTRAST MEDIA; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; FEMALE; FIBROCYSTIC BREAST DISEASE; HUMANS; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, DOPPLER, COLOR; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 33846307456     PISSN: 10833021     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10911-006-9018-0     Document Type: Review

References (102)

1. Wild JJ. The scientific discovery of sonic reflection by soft tissues and application of ultrasound to diagnostic medicine and tumor screening. Third Meeting of the World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (Scientific Exhibit Section) Brighton, England - July 1982. (Cantab) Medico-Technological Research Institute of Minneapolis, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
2. Sabel M, Aichinger H. Recent developments in breast imaging. Phys Med Biol 1996;41:315-68.
3. Wade G. Ultrasonic imaging by reconstructive tomography. Acoust Imag 1980;9:379-431.
4. Greenleaf JF, Bahn RC. Clinical imaging with transmission ultrasonic computerized tomography. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng BME 1981;28:177-85.
5. Hiller D, Ermert H. Ultrasound computerized tomography using transmission and reflection mode: Application to medical diagnosis. Acoust Imag 1982;12:553-64.
6. Schreiman JS, Gisvold JJ, Greenleaf JF, Bahn RC. Ultrasound transmission computed tomography of the breast. Radiology 1984;150:523-30.
7. Scherzinger AL, Belgam RA, Carson PL, Meyer CR, Sutherland JV, Bookstein FL, et al. Assessment of ultrasonic computed tomography in symptomatic breast patients by discriminant analysis. Ultrasound Med Biol 1989;15:21-8.
8. Friedrich M, Hundt E, Maderlechner G. Computerized ultrasound echo tomography of the breast. Eur J Radiol 1982;2:78-87.
9. Kremkau FW. Diagnostic ultrasound: Principles and instruments. 5th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1984.
10. Hedrick WR, Hykes DL, Starchman DE. Ultrasound physics and instrumentation. 3rd ed. St Louis: Mosby; 1995.
11. Zagzebski JA. Essentials of ultrasound physics. St Louis: Mosby; 1996.
12. Stavros AT. Breast ultrasound. Philadelphia: Williams and Wilkins; 2004.
13. Helmut M. The practice of breast ultrasound: Techniques, findings, differential diagnosis. New York: Thieme; 2000.
14. Bassett LW, Kimme-Smith C, Sutherland LK, Gold RH, Sarti D, King W, 3rd. Automated and hand-held breast US: Effect on patient management. Radiology 1987;165:103-8.
15. Bassett LW, Ysrael M, Gold RH, Ysrael C. Usefulness of mammography and sonography in women less than 35 years of age. Radiology 1991;180:831-5.
16. Lamas AM, Horwitz RI, Peck D. Usefulness of mammography in the diagnosis and management of breast disease in postmenopausal women. JAMA 1984;252:2999-3002.
17. Venta LA, Dudiak CM, Salomon CG, Flisak ME. Sonographic evaluation of the breast. Radiographics 1994;14:29-50.
18. Jackson VP. The current role of ultrasonography in breast imaging. Radiol clin North Am 1995;33:1161-70.
19. Bassett LW, Kimme-Smith C. Breast sonography. Am J Roentgenol 1991;156:449-55.
20. Hogg JP, Harris KM, Skolnick ML. The role of ultrasound-guided needle aspiration of breast masses. Ultrasound Med Biol 1988;14 Suppl 1:13-21.
21. Nightingale KR, Kornguth PJ, Trahey GE. The use of acoustic streaming in breast lesion diagnosis: A clinical study. Ultrasound Med Biol 1999;25:75-87.
22. Gordon PB, Goldenberg SL. Malignant breast masses detected only by ultrasound. A retrospective review. Cancer 1995;76:626-30.
23. Kopans DB, Feig SA, Sickles EA. Malignant breast masses detected only by ultrasound: A retrospective review. Cancer 1996;77:208-9.
24. Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH. Occult cancer in women with dense breasts: Detection with screening US-diagnostic yield and tumor characteristics. Radiology 1998;207:191-9.
25. Berg WA. Rationale for a trial of screening breast ultrasound: American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ACRIN). Am J Roentgenol 2003;180:1225-8.
26. Drukker K, Giger ML, Mendelson EB. Computerized analysis of shadowing on breast ultrasound for improved lesion detection. Med Phys 2003;30:1833-42.
27. Jackson VP, Reynolds HE, Hawes DR. Sonography of the breast. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 1996;17:460-75.
28. Stavros AT, Thickman D, Rapp CL, Dennis MA, Parker SH, Sisney GA. Solid breast nodules: Use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology 1995;196:123-34.
29. Jackson VP. Management of solid breast nodules: What is the role of sonography? Radiology 1995;196:14-5.
30. Paulinelli RR, Freitas-Junior R, Moreira MA, Moraes VA, Bernardes-Junior JR, Vidal CS, et al. Risk of malignancy in solid breast nodules according to their sonographic features. J Ultrasound Med 2005;24:635-41.
31. Arger PH, Sehgal CM, Conant EF, Zuckerman J, Rowling SE, Patton JA, et al. Interreader variability and predictive value of US descriptions of solid breast masses: Pilot study. Acad Radiol 2001;8:335-42.
32. American College of Radiology. BI-RADS: Ultrasound, 1st ed. In: Breast imaging reporting and data system: BI-RADS atlas, 4th ed. Reston, Virginia: American College of Radiology; 2003.
33. Mendelson EB, Berg WA, Merritt CRB. Toward a standardized breast ultrasound lexicon, BI-RADS: Ultrasound. Semin Roentgenol 2001;36:217-25.
34. Baker JA, Kornguth PJ, Soo MS, Walsh R, Mengoni P. Sonography of solid breast lesions: Observer variability of lesion description and assessment. Am J Roentgenol 1999;172:1621-5.
35. Hong AS, Rosen EL, Soo MS, Baker JA. BI-RADS for sonography: Positive and negative predictive values of sonographic features. Am J Roentgenol 2005;184:1260-5.
36. Kuo WJ, Chang RF, Moon WK. Computer aided diagnosis of breast tumors with different US systems. Acad Radiol 2002;9:793-9.
37. Horsch K, Giger ML, Vyborny CJ, Venta LA. Performance of computer-aided diagnosis in the interpretation of lesions on breast sonography. Acad Radiol 2004;11:272-80.
38. Goldberg V, Manduca A, Ewert DL, Gisvold JJ, Greenleaf JF. Improvement in specificity of ultrasonography for diagnosis of breast tumors by means of artificial intelligence. Med Phys 1992;19:1475-81.
39. Koyama S, Obata Y, Shimamoto K, Ishigaki T, Ishii N, Isomoto Y, et al. Breast ultrasonography: Computer-aided diagnosis using fuzzy inference. J Ultrasound Med 1997;16:665-72.
40. Chen DR, Chang RF, Huang YL. Computer-aided diagnosis applied to US of solid breast nodules by using neural networks. Radiology 1999;213:407-12.
41. Chen DR, Kuo WJ, Chang RF, Moon WK, Lee CC. Use of the bootstrap technique with small training sets for computer-aided diagnosis in breast ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 2002;28:897-902.
42. Kuo WJ, Chang RF, Lee CC, Moon WK, Chen DR. Retrieval technique for the diagnosis of solid breast tumors on sonogram. Ultrasound Med Biol 2002;28:903-9.
43. Shankar PM, Dumane VA, Piccoli CW, Reid JM, Forsberg F, Goldberg BB. Classification of breast masses in ultrasonic B-mode images using a compounding technique in the Nakagami distribution domain. Ultrasound Med Biol 2002;28:1295-1300.
44. Sahiner B, Chan HP, Roubidoux MA, Helvie MA, Hadjiiski LM, Ramachandran A, et al. Computerized characterization of breast masses on three-dimensional ultrasound volumes. Med Phys 2004;31:744-54.
45. Dumane VA, Shankar PM, Piccoli CW, Reid JM, Forsberg F, Goldberg BB. Computer aided classification of masses in ultrasonic mammography. Med Phys 2002;29:1968-73.
46. Chen CM, Chou YH, Han KC, Hung GS, Tiu CM, Chiou HJ, et al. Breast lesions on sonograms: Computer-aided diagnosis with nearly setting-independent features and artificial neural networks. Radiology 2003;226:504-14.
47. Drukker K, Giger ML, Vyborny CJ, Mendelson EB. Computerized detection and classification of cancer on breast ultrasound. Acad Radiol 2004;11:526-35.
48. Sehgal CM, Cary TW, Kangas SA, Weinstein SP, Schultz SM, Arger PH, et al. Computer-based margin analysis of breast sonography for differentiating malignant and benign masses. J Ultrasound Med 2004;23:1201-9.
49. Piliouras N, Kalatzis I, Dimitropoulos N, Cavouras D. Development of the cubic least squares mapping linear-kernel support vector machine classifier for improving the characterization of breast lesions on ultrasound. Comput Med Imaging Graph 2004;28:247-55.
50. Cary TW, Conant EF, Arger PH, Sehgal CM. Diffuse boundary extraction of breast masses on ultrasound by leak plugging. Med Phys 2005;32:3318-28.
51. Song JH, Venkatesh SS, Conant EF, Arger PH, Sehgal CM. Comparative analysis of logistic regression and artificial neural network for computer-aided diagnosis of breast masses. Acad Radiol 2005;12:487-95.
52. Weinstein SP, Seghal CM, Conant EF, Patton JA. Microcalcifications in breast tissue phantoms visualized with acoustic resonance coupled with power Doppler US: Initial observations. Radiology 2002;224:265-9.
53. Alizad A, Fatemi M, Wold LE, Greenleaf JF. Performance of vibro-acoustography in detecting microcalcifications in excised human breast tissue: A study of 74 tissue samples. IEEE Trans Med Imag 2004;23:307-12.
54. Fornage BD, Sneige N, Edeiken BS. Interventional breast sonography. Eur J Radiol 2002;42:17-31.
55. Burkhardt C. Speckle in ultrasound B-mode scans. IEEE Trans Sonics Ultrason 1978;25:1-6.
56. Entrekin R, Jackson P, Jago JR, Porter BA. Real time spatial compound imaging in breast ultrasound: Technology and early clinical experience. Medicamundi 1999;43:35-43.
57. Kwak JY, Kim EK, You JK, Oh KK. Variable breast conditions: Comparison of conventional and real-time compound ultrasonography. J Ultrasound Med 2004;23:85-96.
58. Kangas SA, Schultz SM, Conant EF, Weinstein S, Arger PH, Schnall MD, et al. Differences between conventional and compound ultrasound imaging of solid breast lesions (Abstract). Radiology Society of North America Chicago, Nov 28-Dec 3, 2004:142.
59. Rosen EL, Soo MS. Tissue harmonic imaging sonography of breast lesions: improved margin analysis, conspicuity, and image quality compared to conventional ultrasound. Clin Imaging 2001;25:379-84.
60. Szopinski KT, Pajk AM, Wysocki M, Amy D, Szopinska M, Jakubowski W. Tissue harmonic imaging: Utility in breast sonography. J Ultrasound Med 2003;22:479-87.
61. Kubota K, Hisa N, Ogawa Y, Yoshida S. Evaluation of tissue harmonic imaging for breast tumors and axillary lymph nodes. Oncol Rep 2002;9:1335-8.
62. Kubota K, Ogawa Y, Nishigawa T, Yoshida S. Tissue harmonic imaging sonography of the axillary lymph nodes: Evaluation of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients. Oncol Rep 2003;10:1911-4.
63. Sehgal CM, Brown GM, Bahn RC, Greenleaf JF. Measurement and use of acoustic nonlinearity and sound speed to estimate composition of excised livers. Ultrasound Med Biol 1986;12:865-74.
64. Law WK, Frizzell LA, Dunn F. Determination of the nonlinearity parameter B/A of biological media. Ultrasound Med Biol 1985;11:138-307.
65. Cosgrove DO, Kedar RP, Bamber JC, al-Murrani B, Davey JB, Fisher C, et al. Breast diseases: Color Doppler US in differential diagnosis. Radiology 1993;189:99.
66. Huber S, Delorme S, Knopp MP, Junkermann H, Zuna I, von Fournier D, et al. Breast tumors: Computer-assisted quantitative assessment with color Doppler US. Radiology 1994;192:797.
67. Raza S, Baum JK. Solid breast lesions: Evaluation with power Doppler US. Radiology 1997;203:164.
68. Birdwell RL, Ikeda DM, Jeffrey SS, Jeffrey RB Jr. Preliminary experience with power Doppler imaging of solid breast masses. AJR 1997;169:703.
69. Sehgal CM, Arger PH, Kotlar EY, Pugh CR, Kirchoffer JI, Bovee KH. Quantitative analysis of color and power Doppler images to differentiate between malignant and benign lesions. J Ultrasound Med 1998;17:S105.
70. Carson PL, Fowlkes JB, Roubidoux MA, Moskalik AP, Govil A, Normolle D, et al. 3-D color Doppler image quantification of breast masses. Ultrasound Med Biol 1998;24:945.
71. Sehgal CM, Arger PH, Rowling SE. Quantitative vascularity of breast masses by Doppler imaging: Regional variations and diagnostic implications. J Ultrasound Med 2000;19:427-40.
72. Lee SW, Choi HY, Baek SY, Lim SM. Role of color and power Doppler imaging in differentiating between malignant and benign solid breast masses. J Clin Ultrasound 2002;30:459-64.
73. Wilkens TH, Burke BJ, Cancelada DA, Jatoi I. Evaluation of palpable breast masses with color Doppler sonography and gray scale imaging. J Ultrasound Med 1998;17:109-15.
74. Del Cura JL, Elizagaray E, Zabala R, Legorburu A, Grande D. The use of unenhanced Doppler sonography in the evaluation of solid breast lesions. AJR 2005;184:1788-94.
75. Pugh CR, Arger PH, Sehgal CM. Power, spectral, and color flow Doppler enhancement by a new ultrasonographic contrast agent. J Ultrasound Med 1996;15:843-82.
76. Kedar RP, Cosgrove D, McCready VR, Bamber JC, Carter ER. Microbubble contrast agent for color Doppler US: Effect on breast masses. Work in progress. Radiology 1996;198:679-86.
77. Huber S, Helbich T, Kettenbach J, Dock W, Zuna I, Delorme S. Effects of a microbubble contrast agent on breast tumors: Computer-assisted quantitative assessment with color Doppler US-early experience. Radiology 1998;208:485-9.
78. Alamo L, Fischer U. Contrast-enhanced color Doppler ultrasound characteristics in hypervascular breast tumors: Comparison with MRI. Eur Radiol 2001;11:970-7.
79. Reinikainen H, Rissanen T, Paivansalo M, Paakko E, Jauhiainen J, Suramo I. B-mode, power Doppler and contrast-enhanced power Doppler ultrasonography in the diagnosis of breast tumors. Acta Radiol 2001;42:106-13.
80. Forsberg F, Goldberg BB, Merritt CR, Parker L, Maitino AJ, Palazzo JJ, et al. Diagnosing breast lesions with contrast-enhanced 3-dimensional power Doppler imaging. J Ultrasound Med 2004;23:173-82.
81. Yang WT, Tse GM, Lam PK, Metreweli C, Chang J. Correlation between color power Doppler sonographic measurement of breast tumor vasculature and immunohistochemical analysis of microvessel density for the quantitation of angiogenesis. J Ultrasound Med 2002;21:1227-35.
82. Hall TJ.BAAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: Topics in US: beyond the basics: Elasticity imaging with US. Radiographics 2003;23:1657-71.
83. Gao L, Parker KJ, Lerner RM, Levinson SF. Imaging of the elastic properties of tissue - a review. Ultrasound Med Biol 1996;22:959-77.
84. Ophir J, Alam SK, Garra B, Kallel F, Konofagou E, Krouskop T, et al. Elastography: Ultrasonic estimation and imaging of the elastic properties of tissues. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H-J. Eng Med 1999;213:203-33.
85. Insana MF, Bamber JC. Tissue motion and elasticity imaging. Phys Med Biol 2000;45(6):v-vi (2 p preceding 1409).
86. Wilson LS, Robinson DE, Dadd MJ. Elastography - the movement begins. Phys Med Biol 2000;45:1409-21.
87. Fatemi M, Greenleaf JF. Probing the dynamics of tissue at low frequencies with the radiation force of ultrasound. Phys Med Biol 2000;45:1449-64.
88. Plewes DB, Bishop J, Samani A, Sciarretta J. Visualization and quantification of breast cancer biomechanical properties with magnetic resonance elastography. Phys Med Biol 2000;45:1591-1610.
89. Fung Y. Biomechanics: Mechanical properties of living tissue. 2nd ed. Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer; 1993.
90. Sarvazyan A, et al. Elasticity imaging as a new modality of medical imaging for cancer detection. Proc. Int. Workshop on Interaction of Ultrasound with Biological Media, Valenciennes, France. (1994). pp 69-81.
91. Sarvazyan A, et al. Biophysical bases of elasticity imaging. Acoust Imag 1995;21:223-40.
92. Hall TJ, Zhu Y, Spalding CS. In vivo real-time freehand palpation imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol 2003;29:427-35.
93. Hiltawsky KM, Kruger M, Starke C, Heuser L, Ermert H, Jensen A. Freehand ultrasound elastography of breast lesions: Clinical results. Ultrasound Med Biol 2001;27:1461-9.
94. Garra BS, Cespedes EI, Ophir J, Spratt SR, Zuurbier RA, Magnant CM, et al. Elastography of breast lesions: Initial clinical results. Radiology 1997;202:79-86.
95. Sohn C, Baudendistel A, Bastert G. Diagnosis of the breast tumor entity "vocal fremitus" in ultrasound diagnosis. Bildgebung 1994;61:291-4.
96. Sohn C, Baudendistel A, Kaufmann M, Bastert MG. The positive "vocal fremitus" in malignant breast tumors in color MEM ultrasound imaging - an exciting artifact in confirming the diagnosis. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 1994;54:427-31.
97. Sohn C, Baudendistel A. Differential diagnosis of mammary tumors with vocal fremitus in sonography: Preliminary report. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995;6:205-7.
98. Nightingale KR, Palmeri ML, Nightingale RW, Trahey GE. On the feasibility of remote palpation using acoustic radiation force. J Acoust Soc Am 2001;110:625-34.
99. Alizad A, Whaley DH, Greenleaf JF, Fatemi M. Potential applications of vibro-acoustography in breast imaging. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2005;4:151-8.
100. Fatemi M, Wold LE, Alizad A, Greenleaf JF. Vibro-acoustic tissue mammography. IEEE Trans Med Imag 2002;21:1-8.
101. Schultz SM, Conant EF, Weinstein S, Kangas SA, Arger PH, Schnall MD, et al. Evaluation of ultrasound imaging parameters on the fremitus effects in breast imaging. Radiology Society of North America. Chicago, Nov 28-Dec 3, 2004;142.
102. Kapur A, Carson PL, Eberhard J, Goodsitt MM, Thomenius K, Lokhandwalla M, et al. Combination of digital mammography with semi-automated 3D breast ultrasound. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2004;3(4):325-34.