Computerized Detection and Classification of Cancer on Breast Ultrasound

Academic Radiology

Volumn 11, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 526-535

  Drukker, Karen ^a   Giger, Maryellen L ^a   Vyborny, Carl J ^a   Mendelson, Ellen B ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^b NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast sonography; Cancer detection; Computer aided diagnosis

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; BREAST CANCER; CANCER CLASSIFICATION; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER STAGING; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 2042525202     PISSN: 10766332     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1076-6332(03)00723-2     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Bassett LW, Ysrael M, Gold RH, Ysrael C. Usefulness of mammography and sonography in women < 35 yrs old. Radiography 1991; 180: 831-835.
2. Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH. Occult cancer in women with dense breasts: detection with screening US-diagnostic yield and tumor characteristics. Radiology 1998; 207:191-199.
3. Chen CM, Chou YH, Han KC, et al. Breast lesions on sonograms: computer-aided diagnosis with nearly setting-independent features and artificial neural networks. Radiology 2003; 226:504-514.
4. Chen DR, Chang RF, Kuo WJ, Chen MC, Huang YL. Diagnosis of breast tumors with sonographic texture analysis using wavelet transform and neural networks. Ultrasound Med Biol 2002; 28:1301-1310.
5. Horsch K, Giger ML, Venta LA, Vyborny CJ. Computerized diagnosis of breast lesions on ultrasound. Med Phys 2002; 29:157-164.
6. Kupinski MA, Giger ML, Bahr AE. Computerized detection of mass lesions in digital mammography using radial gradient index filtering. Radiology 1999; 213:566.
7. Drukker K, Giger ML, Horsch K, Kupinski MA, Vyborny CJ, Mendelson EB. Computerized lesion detection on breast ultrasound. Med Phys 2002; 29:1438-1446.
8. Horsch K, Giger ML, Venta LA, Vyborny CJ. Automatic segmentation of breast lesions on ultrasound. Med Phys 2001; 28:1652-1659.
9. Kupinski MA, Giger ML. Automated seeded lesion segmentation on digital mammograms. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1998; 17:510-517.
10. Kupinski MA, Edwards DC, Giger ML, Metz CE. Ideal observer approximation using Bayesian classification neural networks. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2001; 20:886-899.
11. Kupinski MA, Giger ML. Feature selection with limited datasets. Med Phys 1999; 26:2176-2182.
12. Bishop C. Neural networks for pattern recognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.
13. Lachenbruch PL. Discriminant Analysis. London, England: Hafner, 1975.
14. Metz CE. Basic principles of ROC analysis. Semin Nucl Med 1978; 8:283-298.
15. Metz CE, Herman BA, Shen JH. Maximum likelihood estimation of receiver operating characteristic (roc) curves from continuously-distributed data. Stat Med 1998; 17:1033-1053.
16. Bunch PC, Hamilton JF, Sanderson GK, Simmons AH. A free-response approach to the measurement and characterization of radiographic-observer performance. J Appl Photogr Eng 1978; 4:166-171.
17. Metz CE, Herman BA, Roe CA. Statistical comparison of two ROC curve estimates obtained from partially-paired datasets. Med Decis Making 1998; 18:110-121.