Risk of malignancy in solid breast nodules according to their sonographic features

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine

Volumn 24, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 635-641

  Paulinelli, Régis Resende ^a   Freitas Jr , Ruffo ^a,b   Rebouças Moreira, Marise Amaral ^a   Alves De Moraes, Vardeli ^a   Bernardes Jr , Júlio Roberto M ^a   Da Silva Rocha Vidal, Célio ^a   Ruiz, Alessandro Naldi ^a   Lucato, Miliana Tostes ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF GOIÁS   (Brazil)

^b NONE   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Breast; Breast neoplasms; Diagnosis; Sonography

Indexed keywords

DIAGNOSIS; GYNECOLOGY; MEDICAL IMAGING; PATHOLOGY; PATIENT MONITORING; PATIENT TREATMENT; RISK ASSESSMENT; ULTRASONICS;

ECHO PATTERNS; SOLID BREAST NODULES; SONOGRAPHIC IMAGES;

BIOLOGICAL ORGANS;

ADENOMA; ANTERIOR POSTERIOR AXIS; ARTICLE; BENIGN TUMOR; BREAST TUMOR; CARCINOMA IN SITU; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CYSTOSARCOMA PHYLLOIDES; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FIBROADENOMA; HUMAN; HYPERPLASIA; LIPOMA; LUNG CARCINOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALIGNANT NEOPLASTIC DISEASE; MEDICAL STUDENT; MEDULLARY CARCINOMA; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; RADIODIAGNOSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; STAINING; TUMOR VOLUME;

EID: 17744371672     PISSN: 02784297     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7863/jum.2005.24.5.635     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Marussi EF. Análise da morfologia ultra-sonográfica aliada à colordopplervelocimetria na previsão do diagnóstico histológico dos nódulos sólidos da mama. In: Faculdade de Ciêndas Médicas. Campinas, Brazil: Universidade Estadual de Campinas; 2001:157.
2. Kobayashi T, Takatani O, Hattori N, Kimura K. Differential diagnosis of breast tumors: the sensitivity graded method ultrasonotomography and clinical evaluation of its diagnostic accuracy. Cancer 1974; 33:940-951.
3. Kossoff G. Causes of shadowing in breast sonography. Ultrasound Med Biol 1988; 14(suppl 1):211-215.
4. Leucht WJ, Rabe DR, Humbert KD. Diagnostic value of different interpretative criteria in real-time sonography of the breast. Ultrasound Med Biol 1988; 14(suppl 1):59-73.
5. Guyer PB, Dewbury KC, Rubin CM, Butcher C, Royle GT, Theaker J. Ultrasonic attenuation in fibroadenoma of the breast. Clin Radiol 1992; 45:175-178.
6. Skaane P, Engedal K. Analysis of sonographic features in the differentiation of fibroadenoma and invasive ductal carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998; 170:109-114.
7. Stavros EA, Thickman D, Rapp CL, Dennis MA, Parker SH, Sisney GA. Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology 1995; 196:122-134.
8. Jackson VP. Sonography of malignant breast disease. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 1989; 10:119-131.
9. Fornage BD, Lorigan JG, Andry E. Fibroadenoma of the breast: sonographic appearance. Radiology 1989; 172:671-675.
10. McSweeney MB, Murphy CH. Whole-breast sonography. Radiol Clin North Am 1985; 23:157-167.
11. Egan RL, McSweeney MB, Murphy FB. Breast sonography and the detection of cancer: recent results Cancer Res 1984; 90:90-100.
12. Michelin J, Levy L. Tumores malignos. In: Michelin J, Levy L (eds). Ultra-sonografia da Mama: Diagnóstica e Intervencionista. 1st ed. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Medsi; 2001:67-125.
13. Paulinelli RR, Freitas-Júnior R, Moraes VA, et al. Evaluation of the risk of malignity in solid nodules of the breast according to its sonographic characteristics. Rev Bras Ultra Som 2003; 9:16-18.
14. Paulinelli RR, Vidal CSR, Ruiz AN, Moraes VA, Bernardes-Júnior JRM, Freitas-Júnior R. Prospective study of the ultrasound features in the diagnosis of solid breast lesions. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2002; 24:195-199.
15. American College of Radiology. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Atlas. 1st ed. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 2003.
16. Chen SC, Cheung YC, Su CH, Chen MF, Hwang TL, Hsueh S. Analysis of sonographic features for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast tumors of different sizes. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004; 23:188-193.
17. Rosen RR. Rosen's Breast Pathology. New York, NY: Lippincott-Raven; 1996.
18. Rahbar G, Sie AC, Hansen GC, et al. Benign versus malignant solid breast masses: US differentiation. Radiology 1999; 213:889-894.
19. Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Barclay J, et al. Variability and accuracy in mammographic interpretation using the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. J Natl Cancer Inst 1998; 90:1801-1809.
20. Mendelson EB, Berg WA, Merritt CR. Toward a standardized breast ultrasound lexicon, BI-RADS: ultrasound. Semin Roentgenol 2001; 36:217-225.
21. Roche NA, Given-Wilson RM, Thomas VA, Sacks NP. Assessment of a scoring system for breast imaging. Br J Surg 1998; 85:669-672.
22. Pasqualette HAP, Soares-Pereira PM, Calas MJG, et al. Review and validation of a breast ultrasound report classification proposal. Rev Bras Mastol 2003; 13:159-167.