Federal and state public forest administration in the new millennium: Revisiting Herbert Kaufman's the forest ranger

Public Administration Review

Volumn 67, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 152-164

  Koontz, Tomas M ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846039288     PISSN: 00333352     EISSN: 15406210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00704.x     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations (ACIR). 1980. Citizen Participation in the American Federal System. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
2. Aldrich, Howard E., and Jeffrey Pfeffer. 1976. Environments of Organizations. Annual Review of Sociology 2: 79-105.
3. Beierle, Thomas C., and Jerry Cayford. 2002. Democracy in Practice: Public Participation in Environmental Decisions. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
4. Bowling, Cynthia J., and Dell S. Wright. 1998. Change and Continuity in State Administration: Administrative Leadership across Four Decades. Public Administration Review 58(5): 429-42.
5. Brown, Greg, and Charles Harris. 2000. The U.S. Forest Service: Whither the New Resource Management Paradigm? Journal of Environmental Management 58(1): 1-19.
6. Brunner, Ronald D., Christine H. Colburn, Christina M. Cromley, Roberta A. Klein, and Elizabeth A. Olson. 2002. Finding Common Ground: Governance and Natural Resources in the American West. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
7. Butler, Kelly, and Tomas M. Koontz. 2002. How a "Bureaucratic Superstar" Implements Ecosystem Management: Lessons from the USDA Forest Service. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University, School of Natural Resources, Environmental Communications, Analysis, and Research for Policy Working Group. http://ecarp.osu.edu/kb2002.pdf [accessed October 13, 2006].
8. Carroll, Franklin, John Freemuth, and Les Alm. 1996. Women Forest Rangers: Revisiting Kaufman's The Forest Ranger, Journal of Forestry 94 (1): 38-41.
9. Clarke, Jeanne Nienaber, and Kurt Angersbach. 2001. The Federal Four: Change and Continuity in the Bureau of Land Management, Fish and Wildlife Service, Forest Service, and National Park Service, 1970-2000. In Western Public Lands and Environmental Politics, 2nd ed., edited by Charles Davis, 35-51. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
10. Clarke, Jeanne Nienaber, and Daniel McCool. 1996. Staking Out the Terrain: Power and Performance among Natural Resource Agencies. 2nd ed. Albany: State University of New York Press.
11. Coggins, George Cameron, Charles F. Wilkinson, and John D. Leshy. 2001. Federal Public Land and Resources Law. 4th ed. New York: Foundation Press.
12. Cubbage, Frederick W., Jay O'Laughlin, and Charles S. Bullock III 1993. Forest Resource Policy. New York: Wiley.
13. Culhane, Paul. 1981. Public Lands Politics: Interest Group Influence on the Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
14. Dillman, Don A. 1978. Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. New York: Wiley.
15. Duke, Lois Lovelace. 1992. Career Development and Affirmative Action. In Women and Men of the States: Public Administrators at the State Level, edited by Mary E. Guy, 19-41. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
16. Ellison, Brian A. 1995. Autonomy in Action: Bureaucratic Competition among Functional Rivals in Denver Water Politics. Policy Studies Review 14(1-2): 25-48.
17. Fischer, F. 1993. Citizen participation and the Democratization of Policy Expertise: From Theoretical Inquiry to Practical Cases. Polity Sciences 26(3): 165-87.
18. Gordon, Mark C. 1996. Differing Paradigms, Similar Flaws: Constructing a New Approach to Federalism in Congress and the Court. Yale Law and Policy Review 14(2): 187-225.
19. Gormley, William T. 1992. Food Fights: Regulatory Enforcement in a Federal System. Public Administration Review 52(3): 271-80.
20. Gray, Virginia, and David Lowery. 1995. Interest Representation and Democratic Gridlock. Legislative Studies Quarterly 20(4): 531-52
21. Halperin, Morton H. 1974. Bureaucratic Politics and Foreign Policy, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
22. Heclo, Hugh. 1978. Issue Networks and the Executive Establishment. In The New American Political System, edited by Anthony King, 87-124. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.
23. Hirt, Paul W. 1994. Conspiracy of Optimism: Management of the National Forests since World War Two. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
24. Hoberg, George. 1992. Pluralism by Design: Environmental Policy and the American Regulatory State, New York: Praeger.
25. _. 1997. From Localism to Legalism: The Transformation of Federal Forest Policy. In Western Public Lands and Environmental Politics, edited by Charles Davis, 55-85. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
26. _. 2001. The Emerging Triumph of Ecosystem Management: The Transformation of Federal Forest Policy. In Western Public Lands and Environmental Politics, edited by Charles Davis, 55-86. Boulder, CO: Westview Press
27. Kaufman, Herbert. 1960. The Forest Ranger: A Study in Administrative Behavior, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
28. King, Cheryl Simrell, Kathryn M. Feltey, Bridget O'Neil Susel. 1998. The Question of Participation: Toward Authentic Public Participation in Public Administration. Public Administration Review 58(4): 317-26.
29. Koontz, Tomas M. 1999. Administrators and Citizens: Measuring Agency Officials' Efforts to Foster and Use Public Input in Forest Policy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 9(2): 251-280.
30. _. 2002. Federalism in the Forest: National versus State Natural Resource Policy, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
31. Kunioka, Todd T., and Gary M. Woller. 1999. Bank Supervision and the Limits of Political Influence Over Bureaucracy. Public Administration Review 59(4): 303-13.
32. McCurdy, Howard E. 1992. NASA Organizational Culture. Public Administration Review 52(2): 189-92.
33. Meier, Kenneth J., and John Bohte. 2001. Structure and Discretion: Missing Links in Representative Bureaucracy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 11 (4): 455-70.
34. Morrissey, Wayne A., Jeffrey A. Zinn, and M. Lynne Corn. 1994. Ecosystem Management: Federal Agency Activities. Congressional Research Service Report 94-339ENR. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
35. National Research Council. 1998. Forested Landscapes in Perspective: Prospects and Opportunities for Sustainable Management of America's Nonfederal Forests. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
36. Potoski, Matthew. 1999. Managing Uncertainty through Bureaucratic Design: Administrative Procedures and State Air Pollution Control Agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 9(4): 623-39.
37. Rehfuss, John A. 1986. A Representative Bureaucracy? Women and Minority Executives in California Career Service. Public Administration Review 46(5): 454-60.
38. Riccucci, Norma M., and Judith R. Saidel. 1997. The Representatives of State-Level Bureaucratic Leaders: A Missing Piece of the Representative Bureaucracy Puzzle. Public Administration Review 57(5): 423-30.
39. Rivers, Louie III. 2003. A Descriptive Correlational Study of the Usage of Outdoor Public Lands Held by Different Public Land-Management Agencies by the Cohesive Cultural Subsets of an Urban Area, and the Ability of These Groups to Discern among the Different Land-Management Agencies. Master's thesis, Ohio State University, School of Natural Resources.
40. Roberts, Nancy. 1997. Public Deliberation: An Alternative Approach to Grafting Policy and Setting Direction. Public Administration Review 57(2): 124-32.
41. Sample, V. Alaric. 2003. President, Pinchot Institute for Conservation, Washington, DC. Personal communication with the author.
42. Scholz, John T., and B. Dan Wood. 1998. Controlling the IRS: Principals, Principles, and Public Administration. American Journal of Political Science 42(1): 141-62.
43. Selden, Sally Coleman, and Frank Selden. 2001. Rethinking Diversity in Public Organizations for the 21st Century: Moving Toward a Mulitcultural Model. Administration & Society 33(3): 303-29.
44. Selin, Steven, Michael Schuett, and Deborah Carr. 1997. Has Collaborative Planning Taken Root in the National Forests? Journal of Forestry 95(5): 25-28.
45. Souder, Jon A., and Sally K. Fairfex. 1996. Staff Trust Lands: History, Management, and Sustainable Use. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
46. Squire, Pervill. 1992. Legislative Professionalization and Membership Diversity in State Legislatures. Legislative Studies Quarterly 17: 69-79.
47. Thomas, Craig W. 2003. Bureaucratic Landscapes: Interagency Cooperation and the Preservation of Biodiversity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
48. Thomas, D. A., and R. J. Ely. 1996. Making Difference Matter: A New Paradigm for Managing Diversity. Harvard Business Review 74(5): 79-91.
49. Thomas, Jennifer C., and Paul Mohai. 1995. Racial, Gender, and Professional Diversification in the Forest Service from 1983 to 1992. Policy Studies Journal 23 (2): 296-309.
50. Thompson, Frank, and Michael Scicchitano. 1985. State Enforcement of Federal Regulatory Policy: The Lessons of OSHA. Policy Studies Journal 13(3): 591-98.
51. Thompson, James D. 1967. Organizations in Action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
52. Tipple, Terence, and J. Douglas Wellman. 1991. Herbert Kaufman's Forest Ranger Thirty Years Later: From Simplicity and Homogeneity to Complexity and Diversity. Public Administration Review 51(5): 421-28.
53. Twight, Ben W., and Fremont J. Lyden. 1988. Multiple Use vs. Organizational Commitment. Forest Science 34(2): 474-86.
54. U.S. Forest Service. 2002. The Process Predicament: How Statutory, Regulatory, and Administrative Factors Affect National Forest Management, Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture.
55. Weber, Edward P. 1998. Pluralism by the Rules: Conflict and Cooperation in Environmental Regulation, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
56. Welsh, Michael M. 2004. Reaction of the National Environmental Groups to Devolution. Society and Natural Resources 17(4): 293-304.
57. Whitford, Andrew B. 2002. Bureaucratic Discretion, Agency Structure, and Democratic Rcsponsiveness: The Case of the United States Attorneys. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 12(1): 3-27.
58. Wilkinson, Charles, and H. Michael Anderson. 1987. Land and Resource Planning in the National Forests, Washington, DC: Island Press.
59. Wilson, James Q. 1989. Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It, New York: Basic Books.
60. Wondolleck, Julia M., and Steven L. Yaffee. 2000. Making Collaboration Work: Lessons from Innovation in Natural Resource Management. Washington, DC: Island Press.
61. Worsham, Jeff, Evan Ringquist, and Marc Allen Eisner. 1998. A Theory of Political Influence of the Bureaucracy. Research in Public Administration 4: 251-76.