The Emerging Triumph of Ecosystem Management: The Transformation of Federal Forest Policy

Western Public Lands and Environmental Politics

Volumn , Issue , 2018, Pages 55-85

  Hoberg, George ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85136353359     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780429503139-6     Document Type: Chapter

References (69)

1. Alexander, Thomas. 1989. “Timber Management, Traditional Forestry, and Multiple-Use Stewardship: The Case of the Intermountain Region, 1950-85.” Journal of Forest History 33:21-35.
2. Balmer, Donald G. 1990. “United States Federal Policy on Old-Growth Forests in Its Institutional Setting.” Northwest Environmental Journal 6:331-360.
3. Bobertz, Bradley, and Robert Fischman. 1993. “Administrative Appeal Reform: The Case of the Forest Service.” University of Colorado Law Review 64(2):371-456.
4. Brizee, Clarence. 1975. “Judicial Review of Forest Service Land Management Decisions.” Journal of Forestry 73:424-425; 516-519.
5. Brown, Greg, and Charles Harris. 1993. “The Implications of Work Force Diversification in the U.S. Forest Service.” Administration and Society 25:85-113.
6. Cashore, Benjamin. 1999. “US Pacific Northwest.” In Bill Wilson, G. C. Van Kooten, Ilan Vertinsky, and Louise Arthur, eds., Forest Policy: International Case Studies. Wallingford, CT: CAB Publishing.
7. Clarke, J. N., and D. McCool. 1985. Staking Out the Terrain: Power Differentials Among Natural Resource Management Agencies. Albany: State University of New York Press.
8. Clary, David A. 1986. Timber and the Forest Service. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
9. Congressional Quarterly. 1990. CQ Almanac, 1990. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
10. Congressional Quarterly. 1992. CQ Almanac, 1992. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
11. Congressional Quarterly. 1998. CQ Almanac, 1998. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
12. Connelly, Joel. 1995. “Now, the Act Is in Danger.” Seattle Post-Intelligencer, January 16:A1.
13. Cubbage, Frederick W., Jay O’Laughlin, and Charles S. Bullock III. 1993. Forest Resource Policy. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
14. Culhane, Paul. 1981. Public Lands Politics. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
15. Cushman, John. 1994. “U.S. Moves on Two Fronts to Reshape Logging Rules.” New York Times, April 15:A14.
16. Dietrich, William. 1992. The Final Forest. New York: Simon and Schuster.
17. Donahue, Bill. 1994. “Jack Ward Thomas: Tough New Top Forester.” American Forests 100 (July/August):13-16.
18. Durbin, Kathie. 1999. Tongass: Pulp Politics and the Fight for the Alaskan Rainforest. Corvallis: Oregon State University Press.
19. Egan, Timothy. 1993. “Sweeping Reversal of U.S. Land Policy Sought by Clinton.” New York Times, February 24:A1.
20. Gerlach, Luther P., and David N. Bengston. 1994. “If Ecosystem Management Is the Solution, What’s the Problem?" Journal of Forestry 92(August):18-21.
21. Corte, Ross. 1999, May 7. “Financial Consequences of Forest Service Timber Sales.” Memorandum, Resources, Science, and Industry Division, Congressional Research Service. Washington, DC: Library of Congress.
22. Grode, Jim. 1991. “The Tongass Timber Reform Act: A Step Towards Rational Management of the Forest.” University of Colorado Law Review 62:873-898.
23. Grumbie, R. Edward, ed. 1994. Environmental Policy and Biodiversity. Washington, DC: Island Press.
24. Hanson, Christopher. 1995. “Gorton Prepares to Push Changes in Logging Curbs.” Seattle Post-Intelligencer, January 11:A1.
25. Harris, Richard, and Sidney Milkis. 1989. The Politics of Regulatory Change. New York: Oxford University Press.
26. Hays, Samuel P. 1985. Beauty, Health, and Permanence: Environmental Politics in the United States, 1955-1985. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
27. Helvarg, David. 1994. The War Against the Greens. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books.
28. Hirt, Paul. 1994. A Conspiracy of Optimism: Management of the National Forests Since World War Two. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
29. Hoberg, George. 1992. Pluralism by Design: Environmental Policy and the American Regulatory State. New York: Praeger.
30. Hughes, John. 2000. “Massive Plan Would Guide Public Land Use in Four North-west States.” Los Angeles Times, May 21.
31. Johnston, Bryan, and Paul Krupin. 1991. “The 1989 Pacific Northwest Timber Compromise: An Environmental Dispute Resolution Case Study of a Successful Battle That May Have Lost the War.” Willamette Law Review 27:613-643.
32. Kaufman, Herbert. 1960. The Forest Ranger. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
33. Keister, A. Ross, and Carol Eckhardt. 1994. Review of Wildlife Management and Conservation Biology on the Tongass National Forest: A Synthesis with Recommendations. Corvallis, OR: Pacific Northwest Research Station.
34. Kraft, Michael. 1999. “Environmental Policy In Congress: From Consensus to Gridlock.” In Norman Vig and Michael Kraft, eds. Environmental Policy, 4th ed., Washington, DC: CQ Press.
35. Kriz, Margaret. 1994. “Shoot-Out in the West.” National Journal, October 14:2388-2392.
36. Kriz, Margaret. 1996. “Timber!" National Journal, February 3: 252-257.
37. Le Master, Dennis. 1984. Decade of Change: The Remaking of Forest Service Statutory Authority During the 1970s. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
38. League of Conservation Voters. 1992. National Environmental Scorecard, 1992. Washington, DC.
39. Lee, Robert G. 1994. Broken Trust, Broken Lands: Freeing Ourselves from the War over the Environment. Career Research Institute.
40. Lowi, Theodore. 1979. The End of Liberalism. New York: Norton.
41. McCann, Michael. 1986. Taking Reform Seriously. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
42. McCrackin, Karen. 1993. “Tenakee Springs v. Franzel and the Tongass Timber Reform Act.” Environmental Law 23:1143-1164.
43. Melnick, R. Shep. 1983. Regulation and the Courts: The Case of the Clean Air Act. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
44. O’Toole, Randal. 1988. Reforming the Forest Service. Washington, DC: Island Press.
45. Pryne, Eric, and Mark Matassa. 1993. “Clinton Not in Favor of Changing Environment Laws or Halting Suits.” Seattle Times, April 3:A1.
46. Ruth, Larry. 2000. “Conservation on the Cusp: The Reformation of National Forest Policy in the Sierra Nevada.” UCLA Journal of Environmental Law and Policy 18 (Winter).
47. Sample, V. Alaric. 1990. The Impact of the Federal Budget Process on National Forest Planning. New York: Greenwood Press.
48. Schulte, Brigid. 1992. “Tongass Wildlife Report Suppressed.” Anchorage Daily News, December 27:A1.
49. Sedjo, Roger. 1998. “Forest Service Vision: Or, Does the Forest Service Have a Future” (Discussion Paper 99-03). Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
50. Sher, Victor, and Carol Sue Hunting. 1992. “Eroding the Landscape, Eroding the Laws: Congressional Exemptions from Judicial Review of Environmental Laws.” Harvard Environmental Law Review 15:435-491.
51. Steel, Brent, Peter List, and Bruce Shindler. 1992, January 15. “Oregon State University Survey of Natural Resource and Forestry Issues.” Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University.
52. Steen, Harold K. 1976. The U.S. Forest Service: A History. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
53. Taylor, Andrew. 1993. “President Will Not Use Budget to Rewrite Land-Use Laws.” CQ Weekly Report (April 3):833-834.
54. Timber Industry Labor-Management Committee. 1993, May 26. “The Endangered Worker: A Labor Perspective on Timber Issues” (Press package). Washington, DC.
55. U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1993. California Spotted Owl Sierran Province Interim Guidelines Environmental Assessment. San Francisco: Pacific Southwest Region, U.S. Forest Service.
56. U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1994. Ecosystem Management-1993 Annual Report of the Forest Service. Washington, DC: U.S. Forest Service.
57. U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1997. USDA Forest Service (GPRA) Strategic Plan. Washington, DC: U.S. Forest Service.
58. U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1999. Record of Decision-Tongass National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan, Alaska. Juneau: Alaska Region, U.S. Forest Service.
59. U.S. Department of Agriculture Committee of Scientists. 1999, March 15. Sustaining the People’s Lands: Recommendations for Stewardship of the National Forests and Grasslands into the Next Century. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
60. U.S. Department of Agriculture and U.S. Department of the Interior. 2000, April. Report to the Congress on the Interior Columbia Basin Ecosystem Management Project. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
61. U.S. General Accounting Office. 1989. Endangered Species: Spotted Owl Petition Beset by Problems (GAO /RCED-89-79). Washington, DC: U.S. General Accounting Office.
62. U.S. General Accounting Office. 1999. Forest Service Priorities: Evolving Mission Favors Resource Protection Over Production (GAO/RCED-99-166). Washington, DC: U.S. General Accounting Office.
63. U.S. Office of Technology Assessment. 1992, February. Forest Service Planning: Accommodating Uses, Producing Outputs, and Sustaining Ecosystems. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
64. White, Ben. 2000. “Clinton Releases Forest Plan.” Washington Post, May 10:A8.
65. Wilkinson, Charles F. 1992. Crossing the Next Meridian: Land, Water, and the Future of the West. Washington, DC: Island Press.
66. Wilkinson, Charles F. 1997. “The National Forest Management Act: The Twenty Years Behind, the Twenty Years Ahead.” University of Colorado Law Review 68:659-682.
67. Wilkinson, Charles, and H. Michael Anderson. 1987. Land and Resource Planning in the National Forests. Washington, DC: Island Press.
68. Wolf, Robert E. 1989. “National Forest Timber Sales and the Legacy of Gifford Pinchot: Managing a Forest and Making It Pay.” University of Colorado Law Review 60:1037-1078.
69. Yaffee, Steven Lewis. 1994. The Wisdom of the Spotted Owl. Washington, DC: Island Press.