The analysis of participation in small groups: Methodological and conceptual issues related to interdependence

Small Group Research

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 412-438

  Bonito, Joseph A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036338224     PISSN: 10464964     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/104649640203300402     Document Type: Review

References (69)

1. Bales, R. F., Strodtbeck, F. L., Mills, T. M., & Roseborough, M. E. (1951). Channels of communication in small groups. American Sociological Review, 16, 461-468.
2. Balkwell, J. W. (1995). Strong tests of expectation-states hypotheses. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58, 44-51.
3. Berger, J., & Zelditch, M., Jr. (1977). Status characteristics and social interaction: The status-organizing process. In J. Berger, M. H. Fisek, R. Z. Norman, & M. Zelditch Jr. (Eds.), Status characteristics and social interaction: An expectation-states approach (pp. 3-87). New York: Elsevier.
4. Bonito, J. A. (2000). The effect of contributing substantively on perceptions of participation. Small Group Research, 31, 528-553.
5. Bonito, J. A. (2001). An information-processing approach to participation in small groups. Communication Research, 28, 275-303.
6. Bonito, J. A., & Hollingshead, A. B. (1997). Participation in small groups. In B. R. Burleson (Ed.), Communication yearbook 20 (pp. 227-261). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7. Bottger, P. C. (1984). Expertise and air time as bases of actual and perceived influence in problem-solving groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 214-221.
8. Burke, P. J. (1974). Participation and leadership in small groups. American Sociological Review, 39, 832-843.
9. Burleson, B. R., & Caplan, S. (1998). Cognitive complexity. In J. C. McCroskey, J. A. Daly, M. M. Martin, & M. J. Beatty (Eds.), Communication and personality trait perspectives (pp. 233-286). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
10. Chafe, W. L. (1979). The flow of thought and the flow of language. In T. Givon (Ed.), Syntax and semantics: Vol. 12, Discourse and syntax (pp. 159-181). New York: Academic Press.
11. Chapple, E. D. (1949). The Interaction Chronograph: Its evolution and present application. Personnel, 25, 295-307.
12. Chapple, E. D., Chapple, M. F., Wood, L. A., Miklowitz, A., Kline, N. S., & Saunders, C. (1960). Interaction-Chronograph method for analysis of differences between schizophrenics and controls. Archive of General Psychiatry, 3, 160-167.
13. Coleman, J. S. (1960). The mathematical study of small groups. In H. Solomon (Ed.), Mathematical thinking in the measurement of behavior (pp. 7-149). Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
14. Dabbs, J. M., Jr., & Ruback, R. B. (1987). Dimensions of group process: Amount and structure of group interaction. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 123-169). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
15. Dindia, K., Fitzpatrick, M. A., & Kenny, D. (1997). Self-disclosure in spouse and stranger interaction: A social relations analysis. Human Communication Research, 23, 388-412.
16. Edelsky, C. (1993). Who's got the floor? In D. Tannen (Ed.), Gender and conversational interaction (pp. 189-227). New York: Oxford University Press.
17. Fisek, M. H., & Ofshe, R. (1970). The process of status evolution. Sociometry, 33, 327-335.
18. Goldstein, H. (1995). Multilevel statistical models (2nd ed.). London: Arnold.
19. Hayashi, R. (1991). Floor structure in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics. 16, 1-30.
20. Heinssen, R. K., Glass, C. R., & Knight, L. A. (1987). Assessing computer anxiety: Development and validation of the Computer Anxiety Rating Scale. Computers in Human Behavior, 3, 49-59.
21. Hinsz, V. B., Tindale, R. S., & Vollrath, D. A. (1997). The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 43-64.
22. Huffman, L. R., & Maier, N.R.F. (1979). Valence in the adoption of solutions by problem-solving groups: Concept, method, and results. In L. R. Huffman (Ed.). The group problem solving process (pp. 17-30). New York: Praeger.
23. Hollingshead, A. B. (1996). Information suppression and status persistence in group decision making: The effects of communication media. Human Communication Research. 23, 193-219.
24. Homans, G. C. (1950). The human group. New York: Harcourt.
25. Kashy, D. A., & Kenny, D. A. (2000). The analysis of data from dyads and groups. In H. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social psychology (pp. 451-477). New York: Cambridge University Press.
26. Kelly, H. H., & Thibaut, J. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York: John Wiley.
27. Kenny, D. A. (1994). Interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis. New York: Guilford.
28. Kenny, D. A., Bolger, N., & Kashy, D. A. (2001). Traditional methods for estimating multilevel models. In D. S. Moskowitz & S. Hershberger (Eds.), Modeling intraindividual variability with repeated measures data: Methods and applications (pp. 1-24). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
29. Kenny, D. A., & Cook, W. (1999). Partner effects in relationship research; conceptual issues, analytic difficulties, and illustrations. Personal Relationships, 6, 433-448.
30. Kenny, D. A., & Judd, C. M. (1986). Consequences of violating the independence assumption in analysis of variance. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 431.
31. Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Bolger, N. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 233-265). New York: McGraw-Hill.
32. Kenny, D. A., Mannetti, L., Pierro, A., Livi, S., & Kashy, D. A. (in press). The statistical analysis of data from small groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
33. Keppel, G. (1991). Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
34. Knottnerus, J. D. (1997). Social structural analysis and status generalization: The contributions and potential of expectation states theory. In J. Szmatka, J. Skvoretz, & J. Berger (Eds.), Status, network, and structure: Theory development in group processes (pp. 119-136). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
35. Kunda, Z. (1999). Social cognition: Making sense of people. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36. Lambert, B. L. (2001). Automatic content analysis of pharmacist-patient interactions using the Theme Machine document clustering system. In M. West (Ed.), Progress in communication sciences, Vol. 17: Applications of computer content analysis (pp. 103-122). New York: Ablex.
37. Larson, J. R. (1997). Modeling the entry of shared and unshared information into group discussion: A review and BASIC language computer program. Small Group Research, 28, 454-479.
38. Larson, J. R., Christensen, C., Abbott, A. S., & Franz, T. M. (1996). Diagnosing groups: Charting the flow of information in medical decision-making teams. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 315-330.
39. Larson, J. R., Christensen, C., Franz, T. M., & Abbott, A. S. (1998). Diagnosing groups: The pooling, management, and impact of shared and unshared case information in team-based medical decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 93-108.
40. Laughlin, P. R., & Ellis, A. L. (1986). Demonstrability and social combination processes on mathematical intellective tasks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 177-189.
41. Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. (1991). Culture and socialization in work groups. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 257-279). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
42. Marcus, D. K. (1998). Studying group dynamics with the social relations model. Group Dynamics, 2, 230-240.
43. Matarazzo, J. D. (1973). A speech interaction system. In D. J. Kiesler (Ed.), The process of psychotherapy (pp. 138-146). Chicago: Aldine.
44. Matarazzo, J. D., Wiens, A. N., Matarazzo, R. G., & Saslow, G. (1968). Speech and silence behavior in clinical psychotherapy and its laboratory correlates. In J. M. Shlien, H. F. Hunt, & J. D. Matarazzo (Eds.), Research in psychotherapy (pp. 347-394). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
45. Meyers, R. A., & Brashers, D. E. (1998). Argument in group decision making: Explicating a process model and investigating the argument-outcome link. Communication Monographs, 65, 261-281.
46. Morganthaler, L. (1990). Who's got WHAT floor. Journal of Pragmatics, 14, 537-557.
47. Moritz, S. E., & Watson, C. B. (1998). Levels of analysis issues in group psychology: Using efficacy as an example of a multilevel model. Group Dynamics, 2, 285-298.
48. O'Keefe, B. J., & Lambert, B. L. (1995). Managing the flow of ideas: A local management approach to message design. In B. R. Burleson (Ed.), Communication yearbook 18 (pp. 54-82). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
49. O'Keefe, D. J., & Sypher, H. E. (1981). Cognitive complexity measures and the relationship of cognitive complexity to communication. Human Communication Research, 8,72-92.
50. Parker, K.H.C. (1988). Speaking turns in small group interaction: A context-sensitive event sequence model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 965-971.
51. Pavitt, C. (1993). Does communication matter in social influence during small group discussion? Five positions. Communication Studies, 44, 216-227.
52. Pavitt, C., & Curtis, E. (1994). Small group discussion: A theoretical approach (2nd ed.). Scottsdale, AZ: Gorsuch Scarisbrick.
53. Pedhazur, E. J. (1997). Multiple regression in behavioral research (3rd ed.). Ft. Worth, TX: Harcourt-Brace.
54. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696-735.
55. Shaw, M. E. (1981). Group dynamics: The psychology of small group behavior (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
56. Skvoretz, J. V. (1988). Models of participation in status-differentiated groups. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51, 43-57.
57. Smith-Lovin, L., Skvoretz, J. V., & Hudson, C. G. (1986). Status and participation in six-person groups: A test of Skvoretz's comparative status model. Social Forces, 64, 992-1005.
58. Stasser, G. (1992). Information salience and the discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: A thought experiment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52, 156-181.
59. Stasser, G., Stewart, D. D., & Wittenbaum, G. M. (1995). Expert roles and information exchange during discussion: The importance of knowing who knows what. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 244-265.
60. Stasser, G., & Taylor, L. A. (1991). Speaking turns in face-to-face discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 675-684.
61. Stasser, G., Taylor, L. A., & Hanna, C. (1989). Information sampling in structured and unstructured discussions of three- and six-person groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 67-78.
62. Stasser, G., & Vaughan, S. I. (1996). Models of participation during face-to-face unstructured discussion. In E. H. Witte & J. H. Davis (Eds.), Understanding group behavior (pp. 165-192). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
63. Stasser, G., Vaughan, S. I., & Stewart, D. D. (2000). Pooling unshared information: The benefits of knowing how access to information is distributed among group members. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82, 102-116.
64. Stephan, F. F. (1952). The relative rate of communication between members of small groups. American Sociological Review, 17, 482-486.
65. Stephan, F., & Mishler, E. G. (1952). The distribution of participation in small groups: An exponential approximation. American Sociological Review, 17, 598-608.
66. Stewart, D. D., & Stasser, G. (1998). The sampling of critical, unshared information in decision-making groups: the role of an informed minority. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 95-113.
67. Tesser, A. (1988). Toward a self-evaluation maintenance model of social behavior. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 21, pp. 181-227). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
68. Willard, D., & Strodtbeck, F. L. (1972). Latency of verbal response and participation in small groups. Sociometry, 35, 161-175.
69. Wittenbaum, G. M., & Stasser, G. (1998). The reevaluation of information during group discussion. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 1, 21-34.