Reverse stroop effects with untranslated responses

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 32, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 1345-1353

  Blais, Chris ^a   Besner, Derek ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Selective attention; Skill acquisition; Stimulus response compatibility; Stroop

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CANADA; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLOR VISION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; LEARNING; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REACTION TIME; READING; SPEECH;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; ATTENTION; COLOR PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ONTARIO; REACTION TIME; READING; SPEECH;

EID: 33845665397     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.6.1345     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Bauer, B., & Besner, D. (1997). Processing in the Stroop task: Mental set as a determinant of performance. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51, 61-68.
2. Besner, D., Davies, J., & Daniels, S. (1981). Reading for meaning: The effects of concurrent articulation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 33(A), 415-437.
3. Besner, D., & Stolz, J. A. (1999). What kind of attention modulates the Stroop effect? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 99-104.
4. Besner, D., Stolz, J. A., & Boutilier, C. (1997). The Stroop effect and the myth of automaticity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 221-225.
5. Blais, C., & Besner, D. (2005). When the visual fOrMaT of the color carrier word does and does not modulate the Stroop effect. Memory & Cognition, 33, 1337-1344.
6. Brown, M., & Besner, D. (2001). On a variant of Stroop's paradigm: Which cognitions press your buttons? Memory & Cognition, 29, 903-904.
7. Cheesman, J., & Merikle, P. M. (1985). Word recognition and consciousness. In D. Besner, T. G. Wallet, & G. E. MacKinnon (Eds.), Reading research: Advances in theory and practice: Vol. 5 (pp. 311-342). New York: Academic Press.
8. Chmiel, N. (1984). Phonological encoding for reading: The effect of concurrent articulation in a Stroop task. British Journal of Psychology, 75, 213-220.
9. Cohen, J. D., Dunbar, K., & McClelland, J. L. (1990). On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed account of the Stroop effect. Psychological Review, 97, 332-361.
10. Dalrymple-Alford, E. C., & Azkoul, J. (1972). The locus of interference in the Stroop and related tasks. Perception & Psychophysics, 6, 385-388.
11. De Houwer, J. (2003). On the role of stimulus-response and stimulusstimulus compatibility in the Stroop effect. Memory & Cognition, 31, 353-359.
12. Dishon-Berkovits, M., & Algom, D. (2000). The Stroop effect: It is not the robust phenomenon that you have thought it to be. Memory & Cognition, 28, 1437-1449.
13. Dunbar, K., & MacLeod, C. M. (1984). A horse race of a difference color: Stroop interference patterns with transformed words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 622-639.
14. Durgin, F. H. (2000). The reverse Stroop effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 121-125.
15. Durgin, F. H. (2003). Translation and competition among internal representations in a reverse Stroop effect. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 367-378.
16. Glaser, W. R., & Glaser, M. O. (1989). Context effects in Stroop-like word and picture processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 13-42.
17. Hommel, B. (1998). Automatic stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1368-1384.
18. Hommel, B. (2004). Coloring an action: Intending to produce color events eliminates the Stroop effect. Psychological Research, 68, 74-90.
19. Klopfer, D. S. (1996). Stroop interference and color-word similarity. Psychological Science, 7, 150-157.
20. La Heij, W. (1988). Components of Stroop-like interference in picture naming. Memory & Cognition, 16, 400-410.
21. Lavie, N. (1995). Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 451-468.
22. Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492-527.
23. Lu, C. H., & Proctor, R. W. (2001). Influence of irrelevant information on human performance: Effects of S-R association strength and relative timing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 54(A), 95-136.
24. MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163-203.
25. MacLeod, C. M., & Dunbar, K. (1988). Training and Stroop-like interference: Evidence for a continuum of automaticity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 126-135.
26. Melara, R. D. & Algom, D. (2003). Driven by information: A tectonic theory of Stroop effects. Psychological Review, 110, 422-471.
27. Melara, R. D., & Mounts, J. R. (1993). Selective attention to Stroop dimensions: Effects of baseline discriminability, response mode, and practice. Memory & Cognition, 21, 627-645.
28. Morton, J. (1969). Categories of interference: Verbal mediation and conflict in card sorting. British Journal of Psychology, 60, 329-346.
29. Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 220-244.
30. Pritchatt, D. (1968). An investigation into some of the underlying associative verbal processes of the Stroop colour effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 351-359.
31. Roberts, M. A., & Besner, D. (2005). Stroop dilution revisited: Evidence for domain-specific, limited-capacity processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 3-13.
32. Roelofs, A. (2003). Goal-referenced selection of verbal action: Modeling attentional control in the Stroop task. Psychological Review, 110, 88-125.
33. Ruff, C. C., Woodward, T. S., Laurens, K. R., & Liddle, P. F. (2001). The role of the anterior cingulate cortex in conflict processing: Evidence from reverse Stroop interference. NeuroImage, 14, 1150-1158.
34. Schmidt, J. R., & Cheesman, J. (2005). Dissociating stimulus-stimulus and response-response effects in the Stroop task. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 132-138.
35. Schneider, W. (1988). Micro Experimental Laboratory: An integrated system for IBM PC compatibles. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 20, 206-217.
36. Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime user's guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools.
37. Sharma, D., & McKenna, F. P. (1998). Differential components of the manual and vocal Stroop tasks. Memory & Cognition, 26, 1033-1040.
38. Simon, J. R., & Berbaum, K. (1990). Effect of conflicting cues on information processing: The "Stroop effect" vs. the "Simon effect." Acta Psychologica, 73, 159-170.
39. Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662.
40. Sugg, M. J., & McDonald, J. E. (1994). Time course inhibition in color-response and word-response versions of the Stroop task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 647-675.
41. Van Selst, M., & Jolicœur, P. (1994). A solution to the effect of sample size on outlier elimination. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 47(A), 631-650.
42. Virzi, R. A., & Egeth, H. E. (1985). Toward a translational model of Stroop interference. Memory & Cognition, 13, 304-319.