Dissociating stimulus-stimulus and response-response effects in the stroop task

Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 59, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 132-138

  Schmidt, James R ^a   Cheesman, Jim ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; COLOR VISION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; METHODOLOGY; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; SEMANTICS; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ATTENTION; COLOR PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; HUMANS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; SEMANTICS; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; VOCABULARY;

EID: 23944476173     PISSN: 11961961     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/h0087468     Document Type: Review

References (22)

1. Brown, M., & Besner, D. (2001). On a variant of Stroop's paradigm: Which cognitions press your buttons? Memory & Cognition, 29, 903-904.
2. De Houwer, J. (2003). On the role of stimulus-response and stimulus-stimulus compatibility in the Stroop effect. Memory & Cognition, 31, 353-359.
3. De Jong, R., Liang, C.-C., Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 731-750.
4. Fitts, P. M., & Deininger, R. L. (1954). SR compatibility: Correspondence among paired elements within stimulus and response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 483-492.
5. Glaser, W. R., & Glaser, M. O. (1989). Context effects in Stroop-like word and picture processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 13-42.
6. Green, E. J., & Barber, P. J. (1981). An auditory Stroop effect with judgements of speaker gender. Perception and Psychophysics, 30, 459-466.
7. Klein, G. S. (1964). Semantic power measured through the interference of words with color-naming. American Journal of Psychology, 77, 576-588.
8. Kornblum, S., & Lee, J.-W. (1995). Stimulus-response compatibility with relevant and irrelevant stimulus dimensions that do and do not overlap with the response. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 855-875.
9. Kornblum, S., Stevens, G. T., Whipple, A., & Requin, J. (1999). The effects of irrelevant stimuli: 1. The time course of stimulus-stimulus and stimulus-response consistency effects with Stroop-like stimuli, Simon-like tasks, and their factorial combinations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 688-714.
10. Loftus, G. R., & Masson, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 476-490.
11. MacKinnon, D. P., Geiselman, R. E., & Woodward, J. A. (1985). The effects of effort on Stroop interference. Acta Psychologica, 58, 225-235.
12. MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163-203.
13. Majeres, R. L. (1974). The combined effects of stimulus and response conditions on the delay in identifying the print color of words. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102, 868-874.
14. Masson, M. E. J., & Loftus, G. R. (2003). Using confidence intervals for graphically based data interpretation. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 203-220.
15. Posner, M. I., & Snyder, C. R. R. (1975). Attention and cognitive control. In R. L. Solso (Ed.), Information processing and cognition: The Loyola Symposium (pp. 55-85). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Psychology Software Tools. (2002). E-Prime [Computer software]. Pittsburgh, PA: Author.
17. Sharma, D., & McKenna, F. P. (1998). Differential components of the manual and vocal Stroop tasks. Memory & Cognition, 26, 1033-1040.
18. Simon, J. R., & Sudalaimuthu, P. (1979). Effects of S-R mapping and response modality on performance in a Stroop task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 176-187.
19. Stirling, N. (1979). Stroop interference: An input and an output phenomenon. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 31, 121-132.
20. Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662.
21. Zhang, H., & Kornblum, S. (1998). The effects of stimulus-response mapping and irrelevant stimulus-response and stimulus-stimulus overlap in four-choice Stroop tasks with single-carrier stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 3-19.
22. Zhang, H., Zhang, J., & Kornblum, S. (1999). A parallel distributed processing model of stimulus-stimulus and stimulus-response compatibility. Cognitive Psychology, 38, 386-432.