Class II restorations: Influence of a liner with rubbery qualities on the occurrence and size of cervical gaps

European Journal of Oral Sciences

Volumn 114, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 535-541

  Dewaele, Magali ^a,b   Asmussen, Erik ^b   Devaux, Jacques ^a   Leloup, Gaëtane ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Gap formation; Polymerization shrinkage; Rubbery liner; Strain capacity; Viscous flow

Indexed keywords

2 HYDROXYETHYL METHACRYLATE; ELASTOMER; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; RESIN;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL SURGERY; ELASTICITY; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PHASE TRANSITION; RADIATION EXPOSURE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; TOOTH CERVIX; VISCOSITY;

COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CAVITY LINING; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; ELASTICITY; ELASTOMERS; HUMANS; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MATERIALS TESTING; METHACRYLATES; MOLAR; PHASE TRANSITION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TOOTH CERVIX; VISCOSITY;

EID: 33845437503     PISSN: 09098836     EISSN: 16000722     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2006.00407.x     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. CARVALHO RM, PEREIRA JC, YOSHIYAMA M, PAHLEY DH. A review of polymerization contraction: the influence of stress development versus stress relief. Oper Dent 1996; 21: 17-24.
2. DELIGEORGI V, MJOR IA, WILSON NH. An overview of reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations. Prim Dent Care 2001; 8: 5-11.
3. OPDAM NJ, LOOMANS BA, ROETERS FJ, BRONKHORST EM. Five-year clinical performance of posterior resin composite restorations placed by dental students. J Dent 2004; 32: 379-383.
4. HAYASHI M, WILSON NH. Marginal deterioration as a predictor of failure of a posterior composite. Eur J Oral Sci 2003; 111: 155-162.
5. HICKEL R, MANHART J. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure. J Adhes Dent 2001; 3: 45-64.
6. DAVIDSON CL, FEILZER AJ. Polymerization shrinkage and polymerization shrinkage stress in polymer-based restoratives. J Dent 1997; 25: 435-440.
7. DAVIDSON CL, DE GEE AJ, FEILZER A. The competition between the composite-den tin bond strength and the polymerization contraction stress. J Dent Res 1984; 12: 1396-1399.
8. DAVIDSON CL, DE GEE AJ. Relaxation of polymerization contraction stresses by flow in dental composites. J Dent Res 1984; 63: 146-148.
9. FEILZER AJ, DE GEE AJ, DAVIDSON CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res 1987; 66: 1636-1639.
10. HANSEN EK, ASMUSSEN E. Marginal adaptation of posterior resins: effect of dentin-bonding agent and hygroscopic expansion. Dent Mater 1989; 5: 122-126.
11. PEUTZFELDT A, ASMUSSEN E. Determinants of in vitro gap formation of resin composites. J Dent 2004; 32: 109-115.
12. WATTS DC, AL HINDI A. Intrinsic 'soft-start' polymerization shrinkage-kinetics in an acrylate-based resin-composite. Dent Mater 1999; 15: 39-45.
13. PARK SH, KREJCI I, LUTZ F. Consistency in the amount of linear polymerization shrinkage in syringe-type composites. Dent Mater 1999; 15: 442-446.
14. COOK WD, FORREST M, GOODWIN AA. A simple method for the measurement of polymerization shrinkage in dental composites. Dent Mater 1999; 15: 447-449.
15. TIBA A, CHARLTON DG, VANDEWALLE KS, RAGAIN JC JR. Comparison of two video-imaging instruments for measuring volumetric shrinkage of dental resin composites. J Dent 2005; 33: 757-763.
16. HERRERO AA, YAMAN P, DENNISON JB. Polymerization shrinkage and depth of cure of packable composites. Quintessence Int 2005; 36: 25-31.
17. LEE IB, CHO BH, SON HH, UM CM. A new method to measure the polymerization shrinkage kinetics of light cured composites. J Oral Rehabil 2005; 32: 304-314.
18. BRAEM M, LAMBRECHTS P, VANHERLE G, DAVIDSON CL. Stiffness increase during the setting of dental composite resins. J Dent Res 1987; 66: 1713-1716.
19. DAUVILLIER BS, FEILZER AJ, DE GEE AJ, DAVIDSON CL. Viscoclastic parameters of dental restorative materials during setting. J Dent Res 2000; 79: 818-823.
20. KEMP-SCHOLTE CM, DAVIDSON CL. Complete marginal seal of Class V resin composite restorations effected by increased flexibility. J Dent Res 1990; 69: 1240-1243.
21. HEMBREE JH JR. Microleakage at the gingival margin of Class II composite restorations with glass-ionomer liner. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 61: 28-30.
22. MONGKOLNAM P, TYAS MJ. Light-cured lining materials: a laboratory study. Dent Mater 1994; 10: 196-202.
23. GARCIA-GODOY F, MALONE WF. Microleakage of posterior composite resins using glass ionomer cement bases. Quintessence Int 1988; 19: 13-17.
24. GARCIA-GODOY F. Microleakage of posterior composite resin lined with glass ionomer. Gen Dent 1988; 36: 514-516.
25. HALLETT KB, GARCIA-GODOY F. Microleakage of resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations: an in vitro study. Dent Mater 1993; 9: 306-311.
26. TOLEDANO M, OSORIO E, OSORIO R, GARCIA-GODOY F. Microleakage of Class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 81: 610-615.
27. BAYNE SC, THOMPSON JY, SWIFT EJ JR, STAMATIADES P, WILKERSON M. A characterization of first-generation flowable composites. J Am Dent Assoc 1998; 129: 567-577.
28. ESTEFAN D, ESTEFAN A, LEINFELDER KF. Cavity wall adaptation of resin-based composites lined with flowable composites. Am J Dent 2000; 13: 192-194.
29. LEEVAILOJ C, COCHRAN MA, MATIS BA, MOORE BK, PLATT JA. Microleakage of posterior packable resin composites with and without flowable liners. Oper Dent 2001; 26: 302-307.
30. BELLI S, INOKOSHI S, OZER F, PEREIRA PN, OGATA M, TAOAMI J. The effect of additional enamel etching and a flowable composite to the intcrfacial integrity of Class II adhesive composite restorations. Oper Dent 2001; 26: 70-75.
31. PEUTZFELDT A, ASMUSSEN E. Composite restorations: influence of flowable and self-curing resin composite linings on microleakage in vitro. Oper Dent 2002; 27: 569-575.
32. JAIN P, BELCHER M. Microleakage of Class II resin-based composite restorations with flowable composite in the proximal box. Am J Dent 2000; 13: 235-238.
33. CHUANO SF, LIU JK, JIN YT. Microleakage and internal voids in Class II composite restorations with flowable composite linings. Oper Dent 2001; 26: 193-200.
34. CHUANO SF, LIU JK, CHAO CC, LIAO FP, CHEN YH. Effects of flowable lining and operator experience on microleakage and internal voids in Class II composite restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 85: 177-183.
35. BEZNOS C. Microleakage at the cervical margin of composite Class II cavities with different restorative techniques. Oper Dent 2001; 26: 60-69.
36. BRAGA RR, HILTON TJ, FERRACANE JL. Contraction stress of flowable composites materials and their efficacy as stress-relieving layers. J Am Dent Assoc 2003; 134: 721-728.
37. ALOMARI QD, REINHARDT JW, BOYER DB. Effects of liners on cusp deflection and gap formation in composite restorations. Oper Dent 2001; 26: 406-411.
38. CHUANG SF, JIN YT, LIN TS, CHANG CH, GARCIA-GODOY F. Effects of lining materials on microleakage and internal voids of Class II resin-based composite restorations. Am J Dent 2003; 16: 84-90.
39. TAYLOR DF, KALACHANDRA S, SANKARAPANDIAN M, MCGRATH JE. Relationship between filler and matrix resin characteristics and the properties of uncured composite pastes. Biomaterials 1998; 19: 197-204.
40. WILSON HJ. Properties of radiation-cured restorative resins. In: WILSON HJ, ed. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Fotofil Dental Restorative. London: Franklin Scientific Projects, 1978; 11-16.
41. WALLS AW, MCCABE JF, MURRAY JJ. The polymerization contraction of visible-light activated composite resins. J Dent 1988; 16: 177-181.
42. WATTS DC, CASH AJ. Determination of polymerization shrinkage kinetics in visible-light-cured materials: methods development. Dent Mater 1991; 7: 281-287.
43. VAIDYANATHAN J, VAIDYANATHAN TK, WANG Y, VISWANADHAN T. Thermoanalytical characterization of visible light cure dental composites. J Oral Rehabil 1992; 19: 49-64.
44. RAZAK AA, HARRISON A. The effect of filler content and processing variables on dimensional accuracy of experimental composite inlay material. J Prosthet Dent 1997; 77: 353-358.
45. LABELLA R, LAMBRECHTS P, VAN MEERBEEK B, VANHERLE G. Polymerization shrinkage and elasticity of flowable composites and filled adhesives. Dent Mater 1999; 15: 128-137.
46. LEE IB, SON HH, UM CM. Rheologic properties of flowable, conventional hybrid, and condensable composite resins. Dent Mater 2003; 19: 298-307.
47. CONDON JR, FERRACANE JL. Assessing the effect of composite formulation on polymerization stress. J Am Dent Assoc 2000; 131: 497-503.
48. GÖMEC Y, DÖRTER C, DABANOGLU A, KORAY F. Effect of resin-based material combination on the compressive and flexural strength. J Oral Rehabil 2005; 32: 122-127.
49. ÖZGÜNALTAY G, GÖRÜCÜ J. Fracture resistance of Class II packable composite restorations with and without flowable liners. J Oral Rehabil 2005; 32: 111-115.