Effect of resin-based material combination on the compressive and the flexural strength

Journal of Oral Rehabilitation

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 122-127

  Gomec Y ^a   Dorter C ^a   Dabanoglu, A ^a   Koray, F ^a  

^a ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Compressive strength; Elasticity; Flexural strength; Flowable; Mechanical properties

Indexed keywords

RESIN;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; DENTAL SURGERY; IN VITRO STUDY; TOOTH COLOR;

COMPOMERS; COMPOSITE RESINS; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; DENTAL AMALGAM; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; ELASTICITY; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; METHACRYLATES; SILOXANES; STRESS, MECHANICAL;

EID: 13244251139     PISSN: 0305182X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01394.x     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Behle C. Flowable composites: properties and applications. Pract Periodont Aesthet Dent. 1997;10:347-351.
2. Besnault C, Attal JP. Simulated oral environment and microleakage of class II resin- based composite and sandwich restorations. J Dent. 2003;16:186-190.
3. Bayne SC, Thompson JY, Swift EJ, Stamatiates P, Wilkerson M. A characterization of first generation flowable composite. J Am Dent Assoc. 1998;129:567-577.
4. Anusavice KJ. Philip's Science of Dental Materials. 10th ed. Philadelphia (PA): W.B. Saunders Company; 2002.
5. Lambrechts P, Braem M, Vanharle G. Evaluation of clinical performance for posterior composite resins and dentin adhesive. Oper Dent. 1987;12:53-78.
6. Kelly JR. Perspectives on strength. Dent Mater. 1995;11:103-107.
7. Azillah MA, Anstice M, Pearson GJ. Long-term flexural strength of three direct aesthetic restorative materials. J Dent. 1998;26:177.
8. Yap AUJ and Teoh SH. Comparison of flexural properties of composite restoratives using the ISO and mini-flexural tests. J Oral Rehabil. 2003;30:171-174.
9. International Standards Organisation. Dentistry - Resin-based Filling Materials, ISO 4049: 1988/Cor.1. ISO: Genova; 1992.
10. Esteban D, Mahrokh Y, Angelo AC. Fracture toughness of nine flowable resin composites. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;89:261-267.
11. Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL. Marginal sealing of curing contraction gaps in class composite resin restorations. J Dent Res. 1988;67:841-846.
12. Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL. Complete marginal seal of class V resin composite restorations effected by increased flexibility. J Dent Res. 1990;69:1240-1243.
13. Chuang SF, Liu JK, Jin YT. Microleakage and internal voids in class II composite restorations with flowable composite linings. Oper Dent. 2001;26:193-200.
14. Labella R, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeck P, Vanherle G, Polymerization schrinkage and elasticity of flowable composites and filled adhesives. Dent Mater. 1999;15:128-137.
15. Friedl KH, Schmalz G. Miller KA, Mortavazi F. Marginal adaptation of composite restorations versus hybrid ionomer/composite sandwich restorations. Oper Dent. 1997;2:21-29.
16. Estefan D, Estefan A, Leinfelder KF. Cavity wall adaptation of resin-based composites lined with flowable composites. Am J Dent. 2000;13:192-194.
17. Moon PC, Tabassian PC, Culbreath TE. Flow characteristics and film thickness of flowable resin composites. Oper Dent. 2002;27:248-253.
18. Hofmann N, Siebrecht C, Hugo B, Klaiber B. Influence of curing methods and materials on the marginal seal of class V composite restorations in vitro. Oper Dent. 2003;28-2:160-167.
19. Swift EJ Jr, Triolo PT Jr, Barkmeier WW. Effect of low-viscosity resins on the performance of dentin adhesives. Am J Dent. 1996;9:100-104.
20. Van Meerbeek B, Williems G, Cellis JP. Assesment by nanoindentation of the hardness and elasticity of the resindentin bonding area. J Dent Res. 1993;72:1434-1442.
21. Unterbrink GL and Liebenberg WH. Flowable resin composites as 'filled adhesives': literature review and clinical recommendations. Quintessence Int. 1999;30:249-257.
22. Russel RR and Mazer RB. Should flowable composite be used as liners for class V restorations? J Dent Res. 1999;78:389 (Abstr 2226).