Determinants of in vitro gap formation of resin composites

Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 109-115

  Peutzfeldt, Anne ^a   Asmussen, Erik ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Bond strength; Flexural modulus; Flow; Marginal gaps; Polymerization shrinkage

Indexed keywords

RESIN;

ADHESION; ARTICLE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN; FLOW; POLYMERIZATION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STRENGTH; TOOTH DISEASE;

EID: 1642430833     PISSN: 03005712     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2003.08.008     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Carvalho R.M., Pereira J.C., Yoshiyama M., Pashley D.H. A review of polymerization contraction: the influence of stress development versus stress relief. Operative Dentistry. 21:1996;17-24.
2. Deligeorgi V., Mjor I.A., Wilson N.H. An overview of reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations. Primary Dental Care. 8:2001;5-11.
3. Davidson C.L., Feilzer A.J. Polymerization shrinkage and polymerization shrinkage stress in polymer-based restoratives. Journal of Dentistry. 25:1997;435-440.
4. Davidson C.L., de Gee A.J., Feilzer A.J. The competition between the composite-dentin bond strength and the polymerization contraction stress. Journal of Dental Research. 12:1984;1396-1399.
5. Davidson C.L., de Gee A.J. Relaxation of polymerization contraction stresses by flow in dental composites. Journal of Dental Research. 63:1984;146-148.
6. Feilzer A.J., de Gee A.J., Davison C.L. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. Journal of Dental Research. 66:1987;1636-1639.
7. Wilson H.J. Properties of radiation-cured restorative resins. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Fotofil Dental Restorative. 1978;Franklin Scientific Projects, London. p. 11-6.
8. Walls A.W.G., McCabe J.F., Murray J.J. The polymerization contraction of visible-light activated composite resins. Journal of Dentistry. 16:1988;177-181.
9. Watts D.C., Cash A.J. Determination of polymerization shrinkage kinetics in visible-light-cured materials: methods development. Dental Materials. 7:1991;281-287.
10. Asmussen E., Peutzfeldt A. Influence of composition on rate of polymerization contraction of light-curing resin composites. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 60:2002;146-150.
11. Hald A. Statistical theory with engineering applications. 1952;Wiley, New York.
12. Hayashi M., Wilson N.H.F. Marginal deterioration as a predictor of failure of a posterior composite. European Journal of Oral Sciences. 111:2003;155-162.
13. Hickel R., Manhart J. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 3:2001;45-64.
14. Versluis A., Tantbirojn D. Theoretical considerations of contraction stresses. Compendium. 20:1999;S24-S32.
15. Kemp-Scholte C.M., Davidson C.L. Marginal integrity related to bond strength and strain capacity of composite resin restorative systems. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 64:1990;658-664.
16. Peutzfeldt A., Asmussen E. Influence of eugenol-containing temporary cement on efficacy of dentin-bonding systems. European Journal of Oral Sciences. 107:1999;65-69.
17. Asmussen E., Munksgaard E.C. Adhesion of restorative resins to dentinal tissues. Vanherle G., Smith D.C. Posterior composite resin dental restorative materials. 1985;217-229 Peter Szulc Publishing Co, Utrecht.