Effects of lining materials on microleakage and internal voids of Class II resin-based composite restorations

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 84-90

  Chuang, Shu Fen ^a,b,c   Jin, Ying Tai ^b   Lin, Ting Sheng ^d   Chang, Chih Han ^d   García Godoy, Franklin ^e,f  

^a NATIONAL CHENG KUNG UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^b Department of Operative Dentistry ^*

^c Institute of Biomedical Engineering   (Taiwan)

^d NATIONAL CHENG KUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^e Clinical Research Center   (Sweden)

^f NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPOGLASS; COMPOGLASS FLOW; COMPOMER; DYRACT; DYRACT FLOW; FILTEK FLOW; FLOWABLE HYBRID COMPOSITE; GLASS IONOMER; RESIN; TETRIC FLOW COMPOSITE RESIN;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL SURGERY; ENDODONTICS; EVALUATION; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; POROSITY; TOOTH DISEASE;

COMPOMERS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CAVITY LINING; DENTAL LEAKAGE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MOLAR; POROSITY;

EID: 0041350318     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Kidd EAM. Microleakage: A review. J Dent 1976; 4: 199-206.
2. Going RE. Microleakage around dental restoration: A summarizing review. J Am Dent Assoc 1972; 84: 1349-1357.
3. Brännström M. The cause of postrestorative sensitivity and its prevention. J Endod 1986; 12: 475-481.
4. Kidd EAM, Toffenetti F, Mjör IA. Secondary caries. Int Dent J 1992; 42: 127-138.
5. Harnirattisai C, Inokoshi S, Shimada Y, Hosoda H. Adhesive interface between resin and etched dentin of cervical erosion/abrasion lesions. Oper Dent 1993; 18: 138-143.
6. Li Y, Swartz ML, Phillips RW, Moore BK, Roberts TA. Effect of filler content and size on properties of composites. J Dent Res. 1985;64:1396-1401.
7. Leinfelder KF. Current developments in posterior composite resins. Adv Dent Res 1988; 2: 115-121.
8. Carvalho RM, Pereira JC, Yoshiyama M, Pashley DH. A review of polymerization contraction: The influence of stress development versus stress relief. Oper Dent. 1996;21:17-24.
9. Xie J, Powers JM, McGuckin RS. In vitro bond strength of two adhesives to enamel and dentin under normal and contaminated conditions. Dent Mater 1993;9:295-299.
10. Dietrich TH, Lösche AC, Lösche GM, Roulet JF. Marginal adaptation of direct composite and sandwich restorations in Class II cavities with cervical margins in dentine. J Dent 1999;27:119-128.
11. Duncalf WV, Wilson NHF. A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in small to moderate-size Class II preparations of conventional design. Quintessence Int 2000;31:347-352.
12. Straffon LH, Corpron RL, Bruner FW, et al. Twenty-four month clinical trial of visible light-activated cavity liner in young permanent teeth. ASDC J Dent Child 1991;58:124-127.
13. Hembree JH. Microleakage at the gingival margin of class II composite restorations with glass-ionomer liner. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61: 28-30.
14. Mongkolnam P, Tyas MJ. Light-cured lining materials: A laboratory study. Dent Mater 1994;10:196-202.
15. García-Godoy F, Malone WF. Microleakage of posterior composite resins using glass ionomer cement bases. Quintessence Int 1988;19:13-17.
16. García-Godoy F. Microleakage of a posterior composite resin lined with glass ionomer. Gen Dent 1988;36:514-516.
17. Hallett KB, García-Godoy F. Microleakage of resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations: an in vitro study. Dent Mater 1993;9:306-311.
18. Toledano M, Osorio E, Osorio R, García-Godoy F. Microleakage of Class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:610-615.
19. McLean JW, Wilson AD. The clinical development of the glass-ionomer cement II: Some clinical applications. Aust Dent J 1977; 22:120-127.
20. Krejci I, Lutz F, Krejci D. The influence of different base materials on marginal adaptation and wear on conventional Class II composite resin restorations, Quintessence Int 1988;19:191-198.
21. Dauvillier BS, Feilzer AJ, DeGee AJ, Davidson CL. Visco-elastic parameters of dental restorative materials during setting. J Dent Res 2000;79:818-823.
22. Prati C, Montanari G. Comparative microleakage study between the sandwich and conventional three-increment technique. Quintessence Int 1989;20:587-594.
23. Ikemi T, Nemoto K. Effects of lining materials on the composite resins shrinkage stresses. Dent. Mater J 1994;13:1-8.
24. Uno S, Finger WJ, Fritz U. Long-term mechanical characteristics of resinmodified glass-ionomer restorative materials. Dent Mater 1996;12:64-69.
25. Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Comparative physico-mechanical characterization of new hybrid restorative materials with conventional glass-ionomer and resin composite restorative materials. J Dent Res 1997;76:883-894.
26. Peutzfeldt A. Compomers and glass ionomers: bond strength to dentin and mechanical properties. Am J Dent 1996;9:259-263.
27. Friedl KH, Schmalz G, Hiller KA, Mortazavi F. Marginal adaptation of composite restorations versus hybrid ionomer/composite sandwich restorations. Oper Dent 1997;22:21-29.
28. Aboushala A, Kugel G, Hurley E. Class II composite resin restorations using glass-ionomer liners: Microleakage studies. J Clin Pediatr Dent 1996;21:67-70.
29. van Dijken JWV, Kieri C, Carlen M. Longevity of extensive class II open-sandwich restorations with a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement. J Dent Res 1999;78:1319-1325.
30. Meyer JM, Cattani L, Dupuis V. Compomer: Between glass-ionomer cements and composites. Biomaterials 1998;19:529-539.
31. Burgess J, Norling B, Summitt J. Resin ionomer restorative materials: the new generation. J Esthet Dent 1994;6:207-215.
32. nd International Symposium on Glass ionomers, June, 1994, Philadelphia, PA: International Symposia in Dentistry, 1994;13-22.
33. Eliades G, Kakaboura A, Palaghias G. Acid-base reaction and fluoride release profiles in visible light-cured polyacid-modified composite restoratives (compomers). Dent Mater 1998;14:57-63.
34. van Dijken JW, Horstedt P. Marginal adaptation to enamel of a polyacid-modified resin composite (compomer) and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement in vivo. Clin Oral Investig 1997;1:185-190.
35. Brackett WW, Browning WD, Ross JA, Brackett MG. Two-year clinical performance of a polyacid-modified resin composite and a resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative material. Oper Dent 2001;26:12-16.
36. Bayne SC, Thompson JY, Swift EJ, Stamatiades P, Wilkerson M. A characterization of first-generation flowable composites. J Am Dent Assoc 1998;129:567-577.
37. Leevailoj C, Cochran MA, Matis BA, Moore BK, Platt JA. Microleakage of posterior packable resin composite with and without flowable liners. Oper Dent 2001;26:302-307.
38. Chuang SF, Liu JK, Jin YT. Microleakage and internal voids in Class II composite restorations with flowable composite linings. Oper Dent 2001;26:193-200.
39. Knibbs P. The clinical performance of a glass polyalkenoate (glass ionomer) cement used in a "sandwich" technique with a composite resin to restore class II cavities. Br Dent J 1992;172:102-107.
40. Barakat MM, Powers JM, Yamaguchi R. Parameters that affect in vitro bonding of glass-ionomer liners to dentin. J Dent Res 1988;67:1161-1163.
41. Matis BA, Cochran M, Carlson T. Longevity of glass-ionomer restorative materials: Results of a 10-year evaluation. Quintessence Int 1996;27:373-382.
42. Labella R, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B, Vanherle G. Polymerization shrinkage and elasticity of flowable composites and filled adhesives. Dent Mater 1999; 15: 128-137.
43. Jackson RD, Morgan M. The new posterior resins and a simplified placement technique. J Am Dent Assoc 2000; 131: 375-383.
44. Opdam NJM, Roeters JJM, Joosten M, Veeke O. Porosities and voids in Class I restorations placed by six operators using a packable or syringable composite. Dent Mater 2002; 18: 58-63.
45. Alster D, Feilzer AJ, Gee AJ, Mool A, Davidson CL. The dependence of shrinkage stress reduction on porosity concentration in thin resin layers. J Dent Res 1992; 71: 1619-1622.
46. Irie M, Suzuki K. Marginal gap formation of light-activated base/liner materials: Effect of setting shrinkage and bond strength. Dent Mater 1999;15:403-407.
47. van Dijken JW. A 6-year evaluation of a direct composite resin inlay/onlay system and glass-ionomer cement-composite resin sandwich restorations. Acta Odontol Scand 1994; 52:368-376.
48. Opdam NJM, Roeters FJM, Peters MCRB, Burgersdijk RC, Teunis M. Cavity wall adaptation and voids in adhesive Class I composite resin restorations. Dent Mater 1996; 12:230-235.