Role of featural and configurai information in familiar and unfamiliar face recognition

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 2525, Issue , 2002, Pages 643-650

  Schwaninger, Adrian ^a,b   Lobmaier, Janek S ^b   Collishaw, Stephan M ^c  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER VISION;

COMPUTER VISION ALGORITHMS; HUMAN FACE RECOGNITION; HUMAN SUBJECTS; INTEGRATIVE MODELING; LOCAL INFORMATION; SPATIAL RELATIONS;

FACE RECOGNITION;

EID: 84931361907     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-36181-2_64     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Heisele, B., Serre, T., Pontil, M., Vetter, T, and Poggio, T. (2001). Categorization by learning and combining object parts. NIPS proceedings.
2. Lee, D.D., & Seung, S. (1999). Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization. Nature, 401, 788-791.
3. Ullman, S., & Sali, E. (2000). Object Classification Using a Fragment-Based Representation. BMCV 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1811, pp. 73-87. Berlin: Springer.
4. Tanaka J. W. & Farah, M. J. (1991). Second-order relational properties and the inversion-effect: Testing a theory of face perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 367-372.
5. Tanaka, J. W. & Farah, M. J. (1993). Parts and wholes in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 79, 471-491.
6. Farah, M. J., Tanaka, J. W., & Drain, H. M. (1995). What causes the face inversion effect? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, (3), 628-634.
7. Lades, M., Vorbrüggen, J.C., Buhmann, J., Lange, J., Malsburg, V. D. C, Würtz, R. P, & Konen W. (1993). Distortion invariant object recognition in the dynamic link architecture. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 42, 300-311.
8. Wiskott, L., Fellous, J.M., Kriiger, N., & von der Malsburg, C. (1997). Face Recognition by Elastic Bunch Graph Matching. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 19(7), 775-779.
9. Biedermann, I., & Kalocsai, P. (1997). Neurocomputational bases of object and face recognition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B, 352, 1203-1219.
10. Rhodes, G., Brake, S., & Atkinson, A.P. (1993). What’s lost in inverted faces? Cognition, 47, 25-57.
11. Rakover, S. S. (2002). Featural vs. configurational information in faces: A conceptual and empirical analysis. British Journal of Psychology, 93, 1-30.
12. Collishaw, S.M., Hole G.J. (2000). Featural and configurational processes in the recognition of faces of different familiarity. Perception, 29, 893-910.
13. Davidoff, J., & Donnelly, N. (1990). Object superiority: a comparison of complete and part probes, Acta Psychologica, 73 1990 225-243.
14. Sergent J. (1985). Influence of task and input factors on hemispheric involvement in face processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11(6), 846-61.
15. Green, D.M., & Swets, J.A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley.
16. McMillan, N.A., & Creelman, CD. (1992). Detection theory: A user’s guide. New York: Cambridge University Press.
17. Benton AL, 1980. The neuropsychology of facial recognition. American Psychologist, 35, 176-186.
18. Malone D.R., Morris H.H., Kay M.C., Levin, H.S., 1982. Prosopagnosia: a double dissociation between the recognition of familiar and unfamiliar faces. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 45, 820-822.
19. Ellis, H.D., Shepherd, J.W., Davies G.M., 1979. Identification of familiar and unfamiliar faces from internal and external features: some implications for theories of face recognition. Perception, 8, 431-439
20. Yarmey, A.D., 1971. Recognition memory for familiar “public” faces: Effects of orientation and delay. Psychonomic Science, 24, 286-288.
21. Hasselmo, M.E., Rolls, E.T., & Baylis, C.G. (1989). The role of expression and identity in the face-selective responses of neurons in the temporal visual cortex of the monkey. Experimental Brain Research, 32, 203-218.
22. Perret, D.I., Hietanen, J.K., Oram, M.W., & Benson, P.J. (1992). Organization and functions of cells in the macaque temporal cortex. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B, 335, 23-50.
23. Perret, D.I., Rolls, E.T., & Caan, W. (1982). Visual neurones responsive to faces in the monkey temporal cortex. Experimental Brain Research, 47, 329-342.
24. Perret, D.I., Mistlin, A.J., & Chitty, A.J. (1987). Visual neurones responsive to faces. Trends in Neuroscience, 10, 358-364.
25. Perret, D.I., & Oram, M.W. (1993). Image Vis. Comput., 11, 317-333.
26. Wachsmuth, E., Oram, M.W., & Perret, D.I. (1994). Recognition of objects and their component parts: responses of single units in the temporal cortex of the macaque. Cerebral Cortex, 4, 509-522.
27. Yamane, S., Kaji, S., & Kawano, K. (1988). What facial features activate face neurons in the inferotemporal cortex of the monkey? Experimental Brain Research, 73, 209-214.
28. Schwaninger, Lobmaier, & Collishaw (2002). Role and interaction of featural and configurai processing in face recognition. Vision Sciences Society, 2nd annual meeting, Sarasota, Florida, May 10-15, 2002.