Short-Term Clinical Evaluation of Inlay and Onlay Restorations Made with a Ceromer

International Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 81-86

  Monaco, Carlo ^a   Baldissara, Paolo ^b   Dall'Orologio, Giovanni Dondi ^b   Scotti, Roberto ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CEROMER; DENTAL POLYGLASS; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; GLASS IONOMER; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SCOTCHBOND MULTI PURPOSE; SCOTCHBOND MULTI-PURPOSE; SILICATE CEMENT; SYNTAC DENTINE ADHESIVE; TOOTH CEMENT; VARIOLINK;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CERAMICS; CHEMISTRY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN SENSITIVITY; ENDODONTICS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; STATISTICS; SURFACE PROPERTY;

ADULT; CERAMICS; COLOR; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL CEMENTS; DENTIN SENSITIVITY; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; INLAYS; MALE; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RESIN CEMENTS; SILICATE CEMENT; STATISTICS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 0035239885     PISSN: 08932174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Leinfelder KF. Using composite resin as a posterior restorative material. J Am Dent Assoc 1991;122:65-70.
2. Burke FJT, Qualtrough AJE. Aesthetic inlays: Composite or ceramic. Br Dent J 1994;176:53-60.
3. Roulet JF, Salchow B, Wald M. Margin analysis of posterior composites in vivo. Dent Mater 1991;7:44-49.
4. Retief DH. Do adhesives prevent microleakage? Int Dent J 1994; 44:19-26.
5. Lutz F, Krejci I, Oldenburg TR. Elimination of polymerization stresses at the margins of posterior composite resin restorations: A new restorative technique. Quintessence Int 1986;17:777-784.
6. Koenigsberg S, Fuks A, Grajower R. The effect of three filling techniques on marginal leakage around Class II composite resin restorations in vitro. Quintessence Int 1989;20:117-121.
7. Tjan AHL, Bergh BH, Lidner C. Effects of various incremental techniques on the marginal adaptation of Class II composite resin restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:62-66.
8. Leinfelder KF. Posterior composites: State-of-the-art clinical applications. Dent Clin North Am 1993;37:411-418.
9. Lynde TA, Schlman LB, Meiers JC, Whitehill JM. Dimensional stability of two visible light-cured indirect inlay/onlay resin composite materials. Am J Dent 1996;9:153-156.
10. Lopes LM, Leitao JGM, Douglas WH. Effect of a new resin inlay-onlay restorative material on cuspal reinforcement. Quintessence Int 1991;22:641-645.
11. Wendt SL, Leinfelder KF. Clinical evaluation of a heat-treated resin composite inlay: 3-year results. Am J Dent 1992;5:258-262.
12. Wassell RW, Walls AWG, McCabe JF. Direct composite inlays versus conventional composite restorations: Three-year clinical results. Br Dent J 1995;179:343-349.
13. Bessing C, Lundquist P. A 1-year clinical examination of indirect composite resin inlays: A preliminary report. Quintessence Int 1991;22:153-157.
14. van Dijken JWV. A 6-year evaluation of a direct composite resin inlay/onlay system and glass ionomer cement-composite resin sandwich restorations. Acta Odontol Scand 1994;52:368-376.
15. Dietschi D, Magne P, Hotz J. Recent trends in aesthetic restoration for posterior teeth. Quintessence Int 1994;25:659-667.
16. Cvar JF, Ryge G. Criteria for the clinical evaluation of dental restorative materials. US Department of Health, Education and Welfare. Public Health Service Publication 790-244. San Francisco: US Government Printing Office, 1971.
17. Ryge G. Clinical criteria. Int Dent 1980;30:347-358.
18. American Dental Association Ad Hoc Advisory Committee. Recommendations for evaluating agents for the reduction of dentinal hypersensitivity. Endod Dent Traumatol 1986;2:172-174.
19. Orchardson R, Gangarosa LP, Holland GR, Pashley DH. Towards a standard code of practice for evaluating the effectiveness of treatments for hypersensitive dentine. Arch Oral Biol Suppl 1994;39:121-124.
20. Duke ES. The introduction of a new class of composite resins: Ceromers. Compendium 1999;20:246-247.
21. Miara P. Aesthetic guidelines for second-generation indirect inlay and onlay composite restorations. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1998;10:423-431.
22. Koczarski MJ. Utilization of ceromer inlays/onlays for replacement of amalgam restorations. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1998;10:405-412.
23. Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Increased wall-to-wall curing contraction in thin bonded resin layers. J Dent Res 1989;68:48-50.
24. Fett HP, Mormann WH, Krejci I. The effect of short bevel and silanization on marginal adaptation of computer-machined MOD inlays. Quintessence Int 1991;22:823-829.
25. Wendt SL, Leinfelder KF. The effect of heat used as a secondary cure upon the physical properties of three composite resins. I. Diametral tensile strength, compressive strength and marginal dimension stability. Quintessence Int 1987;18:265-271.
26. Wendt SL, Leinfelder KF. The effect of heat used as a secondary cure upon the physical properties of three composite resins. II. Wear, hardness, and color stability. Quintessence Int 1987;18:351-356.
27. Mante F, Saleh N, Mante M. Softening patterns of post-cured heat-treated dental composites. Dent Mater 1993;9:325-331.
28. Shinkai K, Suzuki S, Leinfelder KF, Katoh Y. How heat treatment and thermal cycling affect wear of composite resin inlays. J Am Dent Assoc 1994;125:1467-1472.
29. Ziemiecki TL, Wendt SL, Leinfelder KF. Effect of heating composite resin on posterior proximal contact maintenance. J Dent Res 1992;72:752.
30. Leinfelder KF. New developments in resin restorative systems. J Am Dent Assoc 1997;128:573-581.
31. van Dijken JWV, Horsed P. Marginal breakdown of fired ceramic inlays cemented with glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cement or resin composite. J Dent 1994;22:265-272.
32. Mehl A, Godescha P, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R. Marginal quality of composite fillings and ceramic inlays in Class II cavities [in German]. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 1996;51:701-704.
33. Krejci I, Lutz F, Reimer M. Marginal adaptation and fit of adhesive ceramic inlays. J Dent 1993;21:39-46.
34. Krejci I. Zahnfarbene Restaurationen: Qualitat, Potential and Indikationen. München/Wien: Hanser, 1992.
35. Lutz F. State of the art of tooth-colored restoratives. Oper Dent 1996;21:237-248.
36. Inokoshi S, Hosoda H, Harnirattisai C, Shimada Y. Interfacial structure between dentin and seven dentin bonding systems revealed using argon ion beam etching. Oper Dent 1993;18:8-16.
37. Hansen SE, Swift EJ. Microleakage with Gluma: Effects of unfilled resin polymerization and storage time. Am J Dent 1989;2:266-268.
38. Crim GA. Prepolymerization of Gluma 4 sealer: Effect on bonding. Am J Dent 1990;3:25-27.
39. Bertschinger C, Paul SJ, Lüthy H, Schärer P. Dual application of dentin bonding agents: Effect on bond strength. Am J Dent 1996;9: 115-119.
40. Miara P. Les inlays-onlays composites. Revue d'Odonto-Stomatologie, Hors Série 1999:43-53.
41. Dietschi D, Spreafico R. Adhesive Metal-Free Restorations. Current Concepts for the Esthetic Treatment of Posterior Teeth. Chicago: Quintessence, 1997
42. Vogel K, Salz U. Influence of light intensity on dentin adhesion [abstr]. J Dent Res (forthcoming).