Microleakage of direct and indirect inlay/onlay systems

Journal of Oral Rehabilitation

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 66-71

  Hasanreisoglu U ^a   Sonmez H ^a   Uctasli S ^a,c   Wilson, H J ^b  

^a ANKARA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^c NONE   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC ACID RESIN; BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; BRILLIANT DENTIN RESIN; COMPOSITE DENTAL RESIN; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; EOS INLAY; ESTILUX POSTERIOR; FUCHSINE; GLASS IONOMER; POLYURETHAN; RESIN;

ARTICLE; CEMENTATION; CEMENTUM; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN; ENAMEL; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; ISOSIT; PREMOLAR TOOTH; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH BRUSHING; TOOTH DISEASE;

ACRYLIC RESINS; BICUSPID; BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; CEMENTATION; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL CEMENTUM; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL LEAKAGE; DENTAL POLISHING; DENTIN; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; INLAYS; POLYURETHANES; ROSANILINE DYES; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 0029683474     PISSN: 0305182X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.1996.tb00814.x     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. BISHOP, B.M. (1989) A heat and pressure cured composite inlay system: a clinical evaluation. Australian Prosthodontic Journal, 3, 35.
2. CASSIN, A.M. & PEARSON, G.J. (1992) Microleakage studies comparing a one-visit indirect composite inlay system and a direct composite restorative technique. Journal of Oral Rehabiliation, 19, 265.
3. CRAIG, R.G. (1985) Overview of posterior composite resins for use in clinical practice. In: Posterior Composite Resin Dental Restorative Materials, (Eds, G. Vanherle & D. C. Smith), p. 199. Peter Szulc Publ Co., The Netherlands.
4. FAYYAD, M.A. & SHORTALL, A.C. (1987) Microleakage of dentine bonded posterior composite restorations. Journal of Dentistry, 15, 67.
5. HASEGAWA, E.A., BOYER, D.B. & CHAN, D.C.N. (1989) Microleakage of indirect composite inlays. Dental Materials, 5, 388.
6. MARTIN, F.E. (1991) The composite resin inlay as an alternative to amalgam. New Zealand Dental Journal, 87, 43.
7. PEUTZFELDT, A. & ASMUSSEN, E. (1990) A comparison of accuracy in seating and gap formation for three inlay/onlay techniques. Operative Dentistry, 15, 129.
8. ROBINSON, P.B., MOORE, B.K. & SWARTZ, M.L. (1987) Comparison of microleakage in direct and indirect composite resin restorations in vitro. Operative Dentistry, 12, 113.
9. RUYTER, I.E. (1985) Monomer systems and polymerization. In: Posterior Composite Resin Dental Restoration Materials (Eds G. Vanherle & D. C. Smith), pp. 109-135. Peter Szulc Publishing Co. Netherlands.
10. SCHERER, W., ÇALIŞKAN, F., KAIM, J., MOSS, S. & VIJAYARAGHAVAN, T. (1990) Comparison of microleakage between direct placement composites and direct composite inlays. General Dentistry, May-June, 209.
11. SHETH, P.J., JENSEN, M.E. & SHETH, J.J. (1989) Comparative evaluation of three resin inlay techniques: microleakage studies. Quintessence International, 20, 831.
12. SHORTALL, A.C., BAYLIS, R.L., BAYLIS, M.A. & GRUNDY, J.R. (1989) Marginal seal comparisons between resin-bonded Class II porcelain inlays, posterior composite restorations and direct composite resin inlays. International Journal of Prosthodontics, 2, 217.