Assessing the regional economic development impacts of universities: A review of current approaches

International Regional Science Review

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 20-46

  Drucker, Joshua ^a   Goldstein, Harvey ^a  

^a The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill   (United States)

Author keywords

Economic development; Economic impact; Human capital; Research; Technology development; Universities

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; ECONOMIC IMPACT; HUMAN CAPITAL; REGIONAL ECONOMY; RESEARCH; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT; UNIVERSITY SECTOR;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33845347360     PISSN: 01600176     EISSN: 15526925     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0160017606296731     Document Type: Review

References (122)

1. Acs, Z. J., D. B. Audretsch, and M. P. Feldman. 1994. R&D spillovers and recipient firm size. The Review of Economics and Statistics 76: 336-340.
2. Adams, C. 2003. The meds and eds in urban economic development. Journal of Urban Affairs 25: 571-588.
3. Adams, J. D. 2002. Comparative localization of academic and industrial spillovers. Journal of Economic Geography 2: 253-278.
4. Agrawal, A., and I. Cockburn. 2003. The anchor tenant hypothesis: Exploring the role of large, local, R&D-intensive firms in regional innovation systems. International Journal of Industrial Organization 21: 1227-1253.
5. Anselin, L., A. Varga, and Z. J. Acs. 1997. Local geographic spillovers between university research and high technology innovations. Journal of Urban Economics 42: 422-448.
6. Arnone, M. 2004. Sinking their teeth into sacred cows. Chronicle of Higher Education 50: A21-A21.
7. Arrow, K. J. 1962. The economic implications of learning by doing. Review of Economic Studies, 80: 155-173.
8. Audretsch, D. B., and P. E. Stephan. 1996. Company-scientist locational links: The case of biotechnology. American Economic Review 86: 641-652.
9. Azzone, G., and P. Maccarrone. 1997. The emerging role of lean infrastructures in technology transfer: The case of the Innovation Plaza project. Technovation 17: 391-402.
10. Bania, N., R. W. Eberts, and M. S. Fogarty. 1993. Universities and the startup of new companies: Can we generalize from Route 128 and Silicon Valley? The Review of Economics and Statistics 75: 761-766.
11. Baryla, E. A. Jr., and D. Dotterweich. 2001. Student migration: Do significant factors vary by region? Education Economics 9: 269-280.
12. Beck, R., and D. Elliott. 1995. Economic impact studies of regional public colleges and universities. Growth and Change 26: 245-260.
13. Beise, M., and H. Stahl. 1999. Public research and industrial innovations in Germany. Research Policy 28: 397-422.
14. Bessette, R. W. 2003. Measuring the economic impact of university-based research. Journal of Technology Transfer 28: 355-361.
15. Beugelsdijk, S., and M. Cornet. 2002. "A far friend is worth more than a good neighbour": Proximity and innovation in a small country. Journal of Management and Governance 6: 169-188.
16. Bitting, R. K. 1994. The evaluation of New York State's Centers for Advanced Technology program: One center's perspective. Journal of the Society of Research Administrators 25: 5-16.
17. Black, D., and J. V. Henderson. 1999. A theory of urban growth. Journal of Political Economy 107: 252-284.
18. Blackwell, M., S. Cobb, and D. Weinberg. 2002. The economic impact of educational institutions: Issues and methodology. Economic Development Quarterly 16: 88-95.
19. Blumenstyk, G. 2002. How colleges get more bang (or less) from technology transfer. Chronicle of Higher Education 48: A24-A26.
20. Bozeman, B. 2000. Technology transfer and public policy: A review of research and theory. Research Policy 29: 627-655.
21. Brett, A. M., D. V. Gibson, and R. W. Smilor. 1991. University spin-off companies: Economic development, faculty entrepreneurs, and technology transfer. Savage, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
22. Candell, A. B., and A. B. Jaffe. 1999. The regional economic impact of public research funding: A case study of Massachusetts. In Industrializing knowledge: University-industry linkages in Japan and the United States, edited by L. M. Branscomb, F. Kodama, and R. Florida, 510-530. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. Carlsson, B., and A. C. Fridh. 2002. Technology transfer in United States universities: A survey and statistical analysis. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 12: 199-232.
24. Clinch, R. 1996. Benchmarking the economic impact and effectiveness of university technology transfer in Maryland. Technical Report (ERIC Number ED407896), Jacob France Center, Baltimore University, Baltimore, MD.
25. Cook, T. D., and D. T. Campbell. 1979. Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
26. Council on Governmental Relations (COGR). 1999. The Bayh-Dole Act: A guide to the law and implementing regulations. Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.cogr.edu/docs/Bayh_Dole.pdf
27. Englmann, F. C., and U. Walz. 1995. Industrial centers and regional growth in the presence of local inputs. Journal of Regional Science 35: 3-27.
28. Feldman, M. P. 1994. The university and economic development: The case of Johns Hopkins University and Baltimore. Economic Development Quarterly 8: 67-77.
29. Feller, I. 1990. Universities as engines of R&D-based economic growth: They think they can. Research Policy 19: 335-348.
30. Feller, I., C. P. Ailes, and J. D. Roessner. 2002. Impacts of research universities on technological innovation in industry: Evidence from engineering research centers. Research Policy 31: 457-474.
31. Felsenstein, D. 1994. The university in local economic development: Benefit or burden? Unpublished paper, Department of Geography and Institute of Urban and Regional Studies, Hebrew University, Mount Scopus, Jerusalem, Israel.
32. Felsenstein, D. 1995. Dealing with "induced migration" in university impact studies. Research in Higher Education 36: 457-472.
33. Felsenstein, D. 1996. The university in the metropolitan arena: Impacts and public policy implications. Urban Studies 33: 1565-1580.
34. Felsenstein, D. 1999. Expenditure and knowledge based regional impacts associated with a university: Some empirical evidence. In Regional development in an age of structural change, edited by P. Rietveld and D. Shefer, 73-93. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
35. Fischer, M. M., and A. Varga. 2003. Spatial knowledge spillovers and university research: Evidence from Austria. Annals of Regional Science 37: 303-322.
36. Florax, R. G. M. 1992. The university: A regional booster? Economic impacts of academic knowledge infrastructure. Aldershot, UK: Avebury.
37. Florax, R. G. M., and H. Folmer. 1992. Knowledge impacts of universities on industry: An aggregate simultaneous investment model. Journal of Regional Science 32: 437-466.
38. Fujita, M., P. Krugman, and A. J. Venables. 1999. The spatial economy: Cities, regions, and international trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39. Glasmeier, A. 1991. The high-tech potential: Economic development in rural America. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research.
40. Glasson, J. 2003. The widening local and regional development impacts of the modern universities-A tale of two cities (and North-South perspectives). Local Economy 18: 21-37.
41. Goldstein, H. A. 1989. Estimating the regional economic impact of universities: An application of input-output analysis. Planning for Higher Education 18: 51-64.
42. Goldstein, H. A., and J. Drucker. 2006. The economic development impacts of universities on regions: Do size and distance matter? Economic Development Quarterly 20: 22-43.
43. Goldstein, H. A., and M. I. Luger. 1992. Impact Carolina: The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and the state's economy. Final report prepared for the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Bicentennial Observance.
44. Goldstein, H. A., G. Maier, and M. I. Luger. 1995. The university as an instrument for economic and business development: U.S. and European comparisons. In Emerging patterns of social demand and university reform: Through a glass darkly edited by D. D. Dill and B. Sporn, 105-133. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.
45. Goldstein, H. A., and C. S. Renault. 2004. Contributions of universities to regional economic development: A quasi-experimental approach. Regional Studies 38: 733-746.
46. Griliches, Z. 1979. Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth. Bell Journal of Economics 10: 92-116.
47. Hall, B. H., A. B. Jaffe, and M. Trajtenberg. 2000. Market value and patent citations: A first look. National Bureau of Economic Research, working paper 7741.
48. Harhoff, D. 1999. Firm formation and regional spillovers. The Economics of Innovation and New Technology 8: 27-55.
49. Harris, R. I. D. 1997. The impact of the University of Portsmouth on the local economy. Urban Studies 34: 605-626.
50. Henderson, R., A. B. Jaffe, and M. Trajtenberg. 1998. Universities as a source of commercial technology: A detailed analysis of university patenting, 1965-88. The Review of Economics and Statistics 80: 119-127.
51. Holmes, T. J. 1998. The effect of state policies on the location of manufacturing: Evidence from state borders. Journal of Political Economy 106: 667-705.
52. Howitt, P. 1999. Steady endogenous growth with population and R&D inputs growing. Journal of Political Economy 107: 715-730.
53. Huffman, D., and J. M. Quigley. 2002. The role of the university in attracting high tech entrepreneurship: A Silicon Valley tale. Annals of Regional Science 36: 403-419.
54. Isserman, A. 1987. An automated quasi-experimental control group method and its application to a tourism economic development project. Paper presented at the North American Regional Science Association Meetings, 6 November, Baltimore, MD.
55. Isserman, A., and J. D. Merrifield. 1987. Quasi-experimental control group methods for regional analysis: An application to an energy boomtown and growth pole theory. Economic Geography 63: 3-19.
56. Jaffe, A. B. 1989. Real effects of academic research. The American Economic Review 79: 957-970.
57. Jaffe, A. B., and M. Trajtenberg. 1996. Flows of knowledge from universities and federal laboratories: Modeling the flow of patent citations over time and across institutional and geographic boundaries. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, USA 93: 12671-12677.
58. Jaffe, A. B., M. Trajtenberg, and R. Henderson. 1993. Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 108: 577-598.
59. Jamison, D. W., and C. Jansen. 2000. Technology transfer and economic growth. Journal of the Association of University Technology Managers 12: 23-45.
60. Jones, C. I. 1995. R&D-based models of economic growth. Journal of Political Economy 103: 759-784.
61. Jones, H., and S. Jenkins. 1999. Networking for innovation in South Wales. Industry and Higher Education 13: 65-71.
62. Jones-Evans, D., M. Klofsten, E. Andersson, and D. Pandya. 1999. Creating a bridge between university and industry in small European countries: The role of the Industrial Liaison Office. R&D Management 29: 47-56.
63. Karlsson, C., and W.-B. Zhang. 2001. The role of universities in regional development: Endogenous human capital and growth in a two-region model. Annals of Regional Science 35: 179-197.
64. Keane, J., and J. Allison. 1999. The intersection of the learning region and local and regional economic development: Analysing the role of higher education. Regional Studies 33: 896-902.
65. Kielbach, M. C. 2000. Spatial knowledge spillovers and the dynamics of agglomeration of regional growth. Heidelberg, Germany: Physica-Verlag.
66. Kirchhoff, B. A., C. Armington, I. Hasan, and S. Newbert. 2002. The influence of R&D expenditures on new firm formation and economic growth. Washington, DC: National Commission on Entrepreneurship, 27-27.
67. Ko, S. C. 1993. The incidence of high technology start-ups and spin-offs in a technology-oriented branch plants complex: The case of the research triangle region, North Carolina. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Department of City and Regional Planning, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
68. Kramer, P. B., S. L. Scheibe, D. Y. Reavis, and L. P. Berneman. 1997. Induced investments and jobs produced by exclusive patent licenses: A confirmatory study. Journal of the Association of University Technology Managers, 9: 79-100.
69. Krugman, P. 1991. Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy 99: 483-499.
70. Kubo, Y. 1995. Scale economies, regional externalities, and the possibility of uneven regional development. Journal of Regional Science 35: 29-42.
71. Luger, M. I., and H. A. Goldstein. 1997. What is the role of public universities in regional economic development? In Dilemmas of urban economic development, edited by R. D. Bingham and R. Mier, 104-134. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
72. Macaluso, T. 2002. Studies reveal colleges' economic impact on area. San Diego Business Journal 23: 37-37.
73. MacIntyre, C. 2003. New models of student housing and their impact on local communities. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 25: 109-118.
74. Malecki, E. J. 1997. Technology and economic development: The dynamics of local, regional, and national competitiveness. White Plains, NY: Longman.
75. Malecki, E. J., and S. L. Bradbury. 1992. R&D facilities and professional labour: Labour force dynamics in high technology. Regional Studies 26: 123-136.
76. Markusen, A., P. Hall, and A. Glasmeier. 1986. High tech America: The what, how, where, and why of the sunrise industries. Sydney, Australia: Allen and Unwin.
77. Martin, F. 1998. The economic impact of Canadian university R&D. Research Policy 27: 677-687.
78. Mowery, D. C., R. R. Nelson, B. N. Sampat, and A. A. Ziedonis. 1999. The effects of the Bayh-Dole Act on U.S. university research and technology transfer. In Industrializing knowledge: University-industry linkages in Japan and the United States, edited by L. M. Branscomb, F. Kodama, and R. Florida, 269-306. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
79. Mowery, D. C., and B. N. Sampat. 2004. The Bayh-Dole Act of 1980 and university-industry technology transfer: A model for other OECD governments? Journal of Technology Transfer 30: 115-127.
80. Mowery, D. C., B. N. Sampat, and A. A. Ziedonis. 2002. Learning to patent: Experience and the quality of university patents 1980-1994. Management Science 48: 73-89.
81. Mowery, D. C., and A. A. Ziedonis. 2000. Academic patent quality and quantity before and after the Bayh-Dole Act in the United States. Research Policy 31: 399-418.
82. National Association of State Universities and Land-Grant Colleges. 2001. Shaping the future: The economic impact of public universities. Available at www.nasulgc.org/publications/EconImpact.pdf
83. Philippidis, A. 2005. Study: County colleges are significant economic factor. Westchester County Business Journal, 23 May, 1-1.
84. Potter, W. 2003. Public colleges try to show their value to states, but not everyone is convinced. Chronicle of Higher Education 49: A26-A26.
85. Pressman, L., S. K. Guterman, I. Abrams, D. E. Geist, and L. L. Nelsen. 1995. Pre-production investment and jobs induced by MIT exclusive patent licenses: A preliminary model to measure the economic impact of university licensing. Journal of the Association of University Technology Managers 7: 49-82.
86. Randazzese, L. P. 1996. Exploring university-industry technology transfer of CAD technology. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 43: 393-401.
87. Riddel, M., and R. K. Schwer. 2003. Regional innovative capacity with endogenous employment: Empirical evidence from the U.S. Review of Regional Studies 33: 73-84.
88. Rip, A. 2002. Regional innovation systems and the advent of strategic science. Journal of Technology Transfer 27: 123-131.
89. Rogers, C. L., and J. L. Tao. 2004. Quasi-experimental analysis of targeted economic development programs: Lessons from Florida. Economic Development Quarterly 18: 269-285.
90. Rogers, E. M., B. Hall, M. Hashimoto, M. Steffensen, K. L. Speakman, and M. K. Timko. 1999. Technology transfer from university-based research centers: The University of New Mexico experience. Journal of Higher Education 70: 687-705.
91. Rogers, E. M., J. Yin, and J. Hoffmann. 2000. Assessing the effectiveness of technology transfer offices at U.S. research universities. Journal of the Association of University Technology Managers 12: 47-80.
92. Romer, P. 1986. Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy 94: 1002-1037.
93. Romer, P. 1990. Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy 98: S71-s100.
94. Sáez, C. B., T. G. Marco, and E. H. Arribas. 2002. Collaboration in R&D with universities and research centres: An empirical study of Spanish firms. R&D Management 32: 321-341.
95. Salter, A. J., and B. R. Martin. 2001. The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: A critical review. Research Policy 30: 509-532.
96. Sampat, B. N., D. C. Mowery, and A. A. Ziedonis. 2003. Changes in university patent quality after the Bayh-Dole act: A re-examination. International Journal of Industrial Organization 21: 1371-1390.
97. Saxenian, A. 1994. Regional advantage: Culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
98. Shadish, W. R., T. D. Cook, and D. T. Campbell. 2002. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
99. Shepherd, S. 2002. So what have you done for us lately? New Mexico Business Journal 26: 21-25.
100. Sivitanidou, R., and P. Sivitanides. 1995. The intrametropolitan distribution of R&D activities: Theory and empirical evidence. Journal of Regional Science 35: 391-415.
101. Smilor, R. W., D. V. Gibson, and G. B. Dietrich. 1990. University spin-out companies: Technology start-ups from UT-Austin. Journal of Business Venturing 5: 63-76.
102. Smith, K. 1997. Economic infrastructures and innovation systems. In Technologies, institutions and organizations, edited by C. Edquist, 86-106. London: Frances Pinter.
103. Solow, R. M. 1957. Technical change and the aggregate production function. The Review of Economics and Statistics 39: 312-320.
104. Spencer, J. W. 2001. How relevant is university-based scientific research to private high-technology firms? A United States-Japan comparison. Academy of Management Journal 44: 432-440.
105. Steffensen, M., E. M. Rogers, and K. Speakman. 2000. Spin-offs from research centers at a research university. Journal of Business Venturing 15: 93-111.
106. Steinacker, A. 2005. The economic effect of urban colleges on their surrounding communities. Urban Studies 42: 1161-1175.
107. Study measures N. H. colleges' economic impact. 2003. New Hampshire Business Review, February 7, 1B-1B, 16B-16B.
108. Swann, P., and M. Prevezer. 1996. A comparison of the dynamics of industrial clustering in computing and biotechnology. Research Policy 25: 1139-1157.
109. Thanki, R. 1999. How do we know the value of higher education to regional development? Regional Studies 33: 84-89.
110. Thursby, J. G., and M. C. Thursby. 2000. Who is selling the ivory tower? Sources of growth in university licensing. National Bureau of Economic Research, working paper 7718.
111. Tornquist, K. M., and S. A. Hoenack. 1996. Firm utilization of university scientific research. Research in Higher Education 37: 509-534.
112. Tripp Umbach & Associates. 2003. The Pennsylvania State University economic impact statement, 2003. Executive summary at http://www.psu.edu/ ur/topics/economic_impact/
113. Tripp Umbach Healthcare Consulting. 2004. The economic impact of medical college and teaching hospital members of the Association of American Medical Colleges. Available at https://services.aamc.org/Publications/
114. UT-Arlington economic impact is enormous, recent study says. 2003. Fort Worth Business Press 23 May, 9-9.
115. Varga, A. 1997. Regional economic effects of university research: A survey. Morgantown, WV: Regional Research Institute, West Virginia University.
116. Varga, A. 1998. University research and regional innovation: A spatial econometric analysis of academic technology transfers. Boston: Kluwer.
117. Varga, A. 2000. Local academic knowledge transfers and the concentration of economic activity. Journal of Regional Science 40: 289-309.
118. Varga, A. 2001. Universities and regional economic development: Does agglomeration matter? In Theories of endogenous regional growth: Lessons for regional policies, edited by B. Johansson, C. Karlsson, and R. Stough, 345-367. New York/Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
119. Walshok, M. L., E. Furtek, C. W. B. Lee, and P. H. Windham. 2002. Building regional innovation capacity: The San Diego experience. Industry and Higher Education 16: 27-42.
120. Weiler, S. 2000. Information and market failure in local economic development: A new role for universities? Economic Development Quarterly 14: 194-203.
121. Young, A. 1998. Growth without scale effects. Journal of Political Economy 106: 41-63.
122. Zucker, L. G., M. R. Darby, and M. B. Brewer. 1998. Intellectual human capital and the birth of the U.S. biotechnology enterprises. The American Economic Review 88: 290-306.