AAC team perceptions: Augmentative and alternative communication device use

Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities

Volumn 41, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 139-154

  Bailey, Rita L ^a   Stoner, Julie B ^a   Parette Jr , Howard P ^a   Angell, Maureen E ^a  

^a ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33845326117     PISSN: 15470350     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Abledata. (n.d.). Welcome to ABLEDATA. Retrieved January 25, 2005, from http://www.abledata. com/
2. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (1991). Report: Augmentative and alternative communication. ASHA, 33(Suppl. 5), 9-12.
3. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (1999). Guidelines for the roles and responsibilities of the school-based speech-language pathologist. Rockville, MD: Author.
4. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (1997-2004). Introduction to augmentative and alternative communication. Retrieved October 20, 2004, from http://www.asha.org/public/speech/disorders/Augmentative-and-Alternative.htm
5. Angelo, D. H. (1996). AAC in the family and home. In S. Glennen & D. Decoste (Eds.), Handbook of augmentative and alternative communication (pp. 523-541). San Diego: Singular.
6. Apel, K. (1999). An introduction to assessment and intervention with older students with language-learning impairments: Bridges from research to clinical practice. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 30, 228-230.
7. Apel, K., & Swank, L. K. (1999). Second chances: Improving decoding skills in the older student. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 30, 231-242.
8. Barbour, R. S. (2001). Checklists for improving rigor in qualitative research: A case of the tail wagging the dog? British Medical Journal 322, 1115-1117.
9. Beigel, A. R. (2000). Assistive technology assessment: More than the device. Intervention in School and Clinic, 35, 237-243.
10. nd ed.). Baltimore: Brookes.
11. th International Conference on Cognitive Disabilities/Mental Retardation, Autism, and Related Disabilities, Las Vegas, NV.
12. Bryant, D. P., & Bryant, B. R. (2003). Assistive technology for people with disabilities. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
13. Calculator, S. N. (1998). AAC and individuals with severe to profound disabilities. In S. L. Glennen & D. C. DeCoste (Eds.), Handbook of augmentative and alternative communication (pp. 445-480). San Diego: Singular.
14. Calculator, S., & Jorgensen, C. (1991). Integrating AAC instruction into regular education settings: Expounding on best practices. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 7, 204-214.
15. Costello, J., & Shane, H. (1994, November). Augmentative communication assessment and the feature matching process. Mini seminar presented at the Annual Convention of American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, New Orleans, LA.
16. Downing, J. E. (1999). Teaching communication skills to students with severe disabilities. Baltimore: Brookes.
17. Ehren, B. J. (2000). Maintaining a therapeutic focus and sharing responsibility for student success: Keys to in-classroom speech-language services. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 31, 219-229.
18. Foley, B. (2001). AAC: Looking back and to the future. AAC in the public schools. Retrieved October 19, 2004, from http://www.ussaac.org/pages/ presentation_ pt3.html#top
19. Glennen, S. L., & DeCoste, D. C. (Eds.). (1997). Handbook of augmentative and alternative communication. San Diego: Singular.
20. Gray, S. (1995). AAC in the educational setting. In S. L. Glennen & D. C. DeCoste (Eds.), Handbook of augmentative and alternative communication (pp. 547-597). San Diego: Singular.
21. nd ed.). Baltimore: Brookes.
22. Huer, M. B. (1997a). Augmentative and alternative communication. In T. A. Crowe (Ed.), Applications of counseling in speech-language pathology and audiology (pp. 335-362). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
23. Huer, M. B. (1997b). Culturally inclusive assessments for children using augmentative and alternative communication (AAC). Journal of Children's Communication Development, 19(1), 23-34.
24. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997, P. L. 105-17. (June 4, 1997). 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq Institute for Matching Person and Technology. (2004). Matching person and technology assessment process. Retrieved October 20, 2004, from http://members.aol.com/impt97/mptdesc. html.
25. Janesick, V. (2000). The choreography of qualitative research design. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 379-399). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26. Kraat, A. W. (1987). Communication interaction between aided and natural speakers: A state of the art report (2nd ed.). Madison, WI: Trace R&D Center, University of Wisconsin.
27. Lahm, E., & Nickels, B. (1999). What do you know? Assistive technology competencies for special educators. Teaching Exceptional Children, 32(1), 56-63.
28. Locke, P. A., & Mirenda, P. (1992). Rules and responsibilities of special education teachers serving on teams delivering AAC services. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 8, 200-214.
29. Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
30. Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31. Murphy, J., Markova, I., Collins, S., & Moodie, E. (1996). AAC systems: Obstacles to effective use. European Journal of Disorders of Communication, 31, 31-44.
32. National Joint Committee for the Communicative Needs of Persons with Severe Disabilities. (1992). Guidelines for meeting the communication needs of persons with severe disabilities. ASHA, 34(March, Supp. 7), 1-8.
33. Parette, H. P. (1998). Interactive CD-ROM technology for family-centered augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) decision-making across cultures. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 414 664).
34. Parette, H. P., Brotherson, M. J., & Huer, M. B. (2000). Giving families a voice in augmentative and alternative communication decision-making. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 35, 177-190.
35. Parette, H. P., Huer, M. B., & Brotherson, M. J. (2001). Related service personnel perceptions of team AAC decision-making across cultures. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 36, 69-82.
36. Parette, P., & McMahan, G. A. (2002). Team sensitivity to family goals for and expectations of assistive technology. Teaching Exceptional Children, 35(1), 56-61.
37. Parette, H. P., & Marr, D. D. (1997). Assisting children and families who use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) devices: Best practices for school psychologists. Psychology in the Schools, 34, 337-346.
38. Parette, H. P., & VanBiervliet, A. (1990). A prospective inquiry of the technology needs and practices of school-age children with disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 10, 198-206.
39. Prelock, P. A. (2000). Multiple perspectives for determining the roles of speech-language pathologists in inclusionary classrooms. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 31, 213-218.
40. Reed, P., & Bowser, G. (1998, November). Education tech points: A framework for assistive technology planning and systems change in schools. Paper presented at the CSUN Conference on Technology and Persons with Disabilities, Los Angeles, CA.
41. Reed, V. A., McLeod, K., & McAllister, L. (1999). Importance of selected communication skills for talking with peers and teachers: Adolescents' opinions. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 30, 32-49.
42. Soto, G., Muller E., Hunt, P., & Goetz, L. (2001). Professional skills for serving students who use AAC in general education classrooms: A team perspective. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 3, 51-56.
43. Stake, R. (2000). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 435-454). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
44. Tanchak, T. L., & Sawyer, C. (1995). Augmentative communication. In K. F. Flippo, K. J. Inge, & J. M. Barcus (Eds.), Assistive technology. A resource for school, work, and community (pp. 57-79). Baltimore: Brookes.
45. VanBiervliet, A., & Parette, H. P. (1999). Families, cultures, and AAC (CD-ROM). Little Rock, AR: Southeast Missouri State University and University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences.
46. Williams, W. B., Stemach, G., Wolfe, S., & Stanger, C. (1995). Lifespace access profile: Assistive technology assessment and planning for individuals with severe or multiple disabilities (rev. ed.). Irvine, CA: Lifespace Access Assistive Technology Systems.
47. Wisconsin Assistive Technology Initiative. (1998). Assessing students' needs for assistive technology: A resource manual for school district teams. Amherst, WI: Author.
48. Woodward, J., & Cuban, L. (Eds.). (2001). Technology, curriculum and professional development. Adapting schools to meet the needs of students with disabilities. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
49. Yorkston, K., & Karlan, G. (1986). Assessment procedures. In S. Blackstone (Ed.), Augmentative communication: An introduction (pp. 163-196). Rockville, MD: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
50. Zabala, J. (1998). Ready, SETT, Go! Online workshop. Retrieved January 7, 2003, from http://www2.edc.org/NCIP/Workshops/sett3/index.html