Estimation of absolute free energies of hydration using continuum methods: Accuracy of partial charge models and optimization of nonpolar contributions

Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 128-139

  Rizzo, Robert C ^a,c   Aynechi, Tiba ^a,d   Case, David A ^b   Kuntz, Irwin D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c Stony Brook University   (United States)

^d Graduate Group in Biophysics   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750899801     PISSN: 15499618     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ct050097l     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Leo, A.; Hansch, C.; Elkins, D. Partition Coefficients and Their Uses. Chem. Rev. 1971, 71, 525-616.
2. Lipinski, C. A.; Lombarde, F.; Dominy, B. W.; Feeney, P. J. Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 2001, 46, 3-26.
3. Abraham, M. H.; Whiting, G. S.; Fuchs, R.; Chambers, E. J. Thermodynamics of Solute Transfer from Water to Hexadecane. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2 1990, 291-300.
4. Chambers, C. C.; Hawkins, G. D.; Cramer, C. J.; Truhlar, D. G. Model for aqueous solvation based on class IV atomic charges and first solvation shell effects. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 16385-16398.
5. Gerber, P. R. Charge distribution from a simple molecular orbital type calculation and nonbonding interaction terms in the force field MAB. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1998, 12, 37-51.
6. Li, J. B.; Zhu, T. H.; Hawkins, G. D.; Winget, P.; Liotard, D. A.; Cramer, C. J.; Truhlar, D. G. Extension of the platform of applicability of the SM5.42R universal solvation model. Theor. Chem. Acc. 1999, 103, 9-63.
7. Åvist, J. Ion-Water Interaction Potentials Derived form Free Energy Perturbation Simulations. J. Phys. Chem. 1990, 94, 8021-8024.
8. Babu, C. S.; Lim, C. Theory of ionic hydration: Insights from molecular dynamics simulations and experiment. J. Phys. Chem. B 1999, 103, 7958-7968.
9. Marcus, Y. A Simple Empirical Model Describing the Thermodynamics of Hydration of Ions of Widely Varying Charges, Sizes, and Shapes. Biophys. Chem. 1994, 51, 111-127.
10. Srinivasan, J.; Cheatham, T. E.; Cieplak, P.; Kollman, P. A.; Case, D. A. Continuum solvent studies of the stability of DNA, RNA, and phosphoramidate-DNA helices. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 9401-9409.
11. Kollman, P. A.; Massova, I.; Reyes, C.; Kuhn, B.; Huo, S.; Chong, L.; Lee, M.; Lee, T.; Duan, Y.; Wang, W.; Donini, I.; Cieplak, P.; Srinivasan, J.; Case, D. A.; Cheatham, T. E. Calculating structures and free energies of complex molecules: combining molecular mechanics and continuum models. Acc. Chem. Res. 2000, 33, 889-897.
12. Massova, I.; Kollman, P. A. Combined molecular mechanical and continuum solvent approach (MM-PBSA/GBSA) to predict ligand binding. Perspect. Drug Discovery Des. 2000, 18, 113-135.
13. Kuhn, B.; Kollman, P.A. Binding of a diverse set of ligands to avidin and streptavidin: An accurate quantitative prediction of their relative affinities by a combination of molecular mechanics and continuum solvent models. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 3786-3791.
14. Wang, J.; Morin, P.; Wang, W.; Kollman, P. A. Use of MM-PBSA in reproducing the binding free energies to HIV-1 RT of TIBO derivatives and predicting the binding mode to HIV-1 RT of efavirenz by docking and MM-PBSA. J. Ant. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 5221-5230.
15. Masukawa, K. M.; Kollman, P. A.; Kuntz, I. D. Investigation of Neuraminidase-Substrate Recognition Using Molecular Dynamics and Free Energy Calculations. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46, 5628-5637.
16. Huo, S.; Wang, J.; Cieplak, P.; Kollman, P. A.; Kuntz, I. D. Molecular dynamics and free energy analyses of cathepsin D-inhibitor interactions: insight into structure-based ligand design. J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 1412-1419.
17. Wang, W.; Lim, W. A.; Jakalian, A.; Wang, J.; Luo, R.; Bayly, C. I.; Kollman, P. A. An analysis of the interactions between the Sem-5 SH3 domain and its ligands using molecular dynamics, free energy calculations, and sequence analysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 3986-3994.
18. Suenaga, A.; Hatakeyama, M.; Ichikawa, M.; Yu, X.; Futatsugi, N.; Narumi, T.; Fukui, K.; Terada, T.; Taiji, M.; Shirouzu, M.; Yokoyama, S.; Konagaya, A. Molecular dynamics, free energy, and SPR analyses of the interactions between the SH2 domain of Grb2 and ErbB phosphotyrosyl peptides. Biochemistry 2003, 42, 5195-5200.
19. Donini, O. A. T.; Kollman, P. A. Calculation and prediction of binding free energies for the matrix metalloproteinases. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 4180-4188.
20. Rizzo, R. C.; Toba, S.; Kuntz, I. D. A Molecular Basis for the Selectivity of Thiadiazole Urea Inhibitors with Stromelysin-1 and Gelatinase-A from Generalized Born Molecular Dynamics Simulations. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 3065-3074.
21. Jorgensen, W. L. Free Energy Calculations: A Breakthrough For Modeling Organic Chemistry in Solution. Acc. Chem. Res. 1989, 22, 184-189.
22. Kollman, P. Free Energy Calculations: Applications to Chemical and Biochemical Phenomena. Chem. Rev. 1993, 93, 2395-2417.
23. Jorgensen, W. L.; Ravimohan, C. Monte Carlo Simulation of Differences in Free Energies of Hydration. J. Chem. Phys. 1985, 83, 3050-3054.
24. Cramer, C. J.; Truhlar, D. G. Implicit Solvation Models: Equilibria, Structure, Spectra, and Dynamics. Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 2161-2200.
25. Sitkoff, D.; Sharp, K. A.; Honig, B. Accurate Calculation of Hydration Free-Energies Using Macroscopic Solvent Models. J. Phys. Chem. 1994, 98, 1978-1988.
26. Still, W. C.; Tempczyk, A.; Hawley, R. C.; Hendrickson, T. Semianalytical Treatment of Solvation For Molecular Mechanics and Dynamics. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990,112, 6127-6129.
27. Feig, M.; Onufriev, A.; Lee, M. S.; Im, W.; Case, D. A.; Brooks, C. L., III Performance comparison of generalized Born and Poisson methods in the calculation of electrostatic solvation energies for protein structures. J. Comput. Chem. 2004, 25, 265-284.
28. Udier-Blagovic, M.; Morales De Tirado, P.; Pearlman, S. A.; Jorgensen, W. L. Accuracy of free energies of hydration using CM1 and CM3 atomic charges. J. Comput. Chem. 2004, 25, 1322-1332.
29. Jakalian, A.; Bush, B. L.; Jack, D. B.; Bayly, C. I. Fast, efficient generation of high-quality atomic charges. AM1-BCC model: I. Method. J. Comput. Chem. 2000, 21, 132-146.
30. Jakalian, A.; Jack, D. B.; Bayly, C. I. Fast, efficient generation of high-quality atomic charges. AM1-BCC model: II. Parametrization and validation. J. Comput. Chem. 2002, 23, 1623-1641.
31. Bordner, A. J.; Cavasotto, C. N.; Abagyan, R. A. Accurate Transferable Model for Water, n-Octanol, and n-Hexadecane Solvation Free Energies. J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106, 11009-11015.
32. Jorgensen, W. L.; Ulmschneider, J. P.; Tirado-Rives, J. Free Energies of Hydration from a Generalized Born Model and an All-Atom Force Field. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 16264-16270.
33. Gallicchio, E.; Zhang, L. Y.; Levy, R. M. The SGB/NP hydration free energy model based on the surface generalized born solvent reaction field and novel nonpolar hydration free energy estimators. J. Comput. Chem. 2002, 23, 517-529.
34. Gallicchio, E.; Levy, R. M. AGBNP: an analytic implicit solvent model suitable for molecular dynamics simulations and high-resolution modeling. J. Comput. Chem. 2004, 25, 479-499.
35. Hawkins, G. D.; Giesen, D. J.; Lynch, G. C.; Chambers, C. C; Rossi, I.; Storer, J. W.; Li, J.; Winget, P.; Rinaldi, D.; Liotard, D. A.; Cramer, C. J.; Truhlar, D. G. AMSOL, version 6.6; University of Minnesota: Minneapolis, Minnesota. Based in part on AMPAC, version 2.1, by Liotard, D. A.; Healy, E. F.; Ruiz, J. M.; Dewar, M. J. S. and on EF by Jensen, F.
36. Marten, B.; Kim, K.; Cortis, C.; Friesner, R. A.; Murphy, R. B.; Ringnalda, M. N.; Sitkoff, D.; Honig, B. New model for calculation of solvation free energies: Correction of self-consistent reaction field continuum dielectric theory for short-range hydrogen-bonding effects. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 700, 11775-11788.
37. Hawkins, G. D.; Cramer, C. J.; Truhlar, D. G. Pairwise Solute Descreening of Solute Charges from a Dielectric Medium. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1995, 246, 122-129.
38. Hawkins, G. D.; Cramer, C. J.; Truhlar, D. G. Parametrized models of aqueous free energies of solvation based on pairwise descreening of solute atomic charges from a dielectric medium. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 19824-19839.
39. Eisenberg, D.; McLachlan, A. D. Solvation Energy in Protein Folding and Binding. Nature 1986, 379, 199-203.
40. Ooi, T.; Oobatake, M; Nemethy, G.; Scheraga, H. A. Accessible Surface-Areas as a Measure of the Thermodynamic Parameters of Hydration of Peptides. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1987, 84, 3086-3090.
41. Tsui, V.; Case, D. A. Molecular dynamics simulations of nucleic acids with a generalized born solvation model. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 2489-2498.
42. Tsui, V.; Case, D. A. Theory and applications of the generalized Bom solvation model in macromolecular simulations. Biopolymers 2000, 56, 275-291.
43. Case, D. A.; Cheatham, T. E., III; Darden, T.; Gohlke, H.; Luo, R.; Merz, K. M., Jr.; Onufriev, A.; Simmerling, C.; Wang, B.; Woods, R. J. The Amber biomolecular simulation programs. J. Comput. Chem. 2005, 26, 1668-1688.
44. Rocchia, W.; Alexov, E.; Honig, B. Extending the applicability of the nonlinear Poisson-Boltzmann equation: Multiple dielectric constants and multivalent ions. J. Phys. Chem. B 2001, 105, 6507-6514.
45. Rocchia, W.; Sridharan, S.; Nicholls, A.; Alexov, E.; Chiabrera, A.; Honig, B. Rapid grid-based construction of the molecular surface and the use of induced surface charge to calculate reaction field energies: applications to the molecular systems and geometric objects. J. Comput. Chem. 2002, 23, 128-137.
46. DMS; University of California at San Francisco Computer Graphics Laboratory: San Francisco, CA.
47. Bondi, A. van der Waals Volumes and Radii. J. Phys. Chem. 1964, 68, 441-451.
48. NCI Public Database, http://dtp.nci.nih.gov.
49. MOE, version 2002.03; Chemical Computing Group: Montreal, Canada.
50. Gasteiger, J.; Marsili, M. Iterative Partial Equalization of Orbital Electronegativity -a Rapid Access to Atomic Charges. Tetrahedron 1980, 36, 3219-3228.
51. Halgren, T. A. Merck molecular force field. 1. Basis, form, scope, parametrization, and performance of MMFF94. J. Comput. Chem. 1996, 17, 490-519.
52. Li, J. B.; Zhu, T. H.; Cramer, C. J.; Truhlar, D. G. New class IV charge model for extracting accurate partial charges from wave functions. J. Phys. Chem. A 1998, 102, 1820-1831.
53. Besler, B. H.; Merz, K. M.; Kollman, P. A. Atomic Charges Derived from Semiempirical Methods. J. Comput. Chem. 1990, 11, 431-439.
54. Bayly, C. I.; Cieplak, P.; Cornell, W. D.; Kollman, P. A. A Well-Behaved Electrostatic Potential Based Method Using-Charge Restraints For Deriving Atomic Charges-the RESP Model. J. Phys. Chem. 1993, 97, 10269-10280.
55. Cornell, W. D.; Cieplak, P.; Bayly, C. I.; Kollman, P. A. Application of Resp Charges to Calculate Conformational Energies, Hydrogen-Bond Energies, and Free-Energies of Solvation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 9620-9631.
56. Breneman, C. M.; Wiberg, K. B. Determining Atom-Centered Monopoles from Molecular Electrostatic Potentials-the Need for High Sampling Density in Formamide Conformational-Analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 1990, 11, 361-373.
57. Stewart, J. J. P.; Rossi, I.; Hu, W.-P.; Lynch, G. C.; Liu, Y.-P.; Chuang, Y.-Y.; Li, J.; Cramer, C. J.; Fast, P. L.; Truhlar, D. G. MOPAC, version 5.09mn; University of Minnesota: Minneapolis, Minnesota.
58. Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb, M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Montgomery, J. A., Jr.; Stratmann, R. E.; Burant, J. C.; Dapprich, S.; Millam, J. M.; Daniels, A. D.; Kudin, K. N.; Strain, M. C.; Farkas, O.; Tomasi, J.; Barone, V.; Cossi, M.; Cammi, R.; Mennucci, B.; Pomelli, C.; Adamo, C.; Clifford, S.; Ochterski, J.; Petersson, G. A.; Ayala, P. Y.; Cui, Q.; Morokuma, K.; Malick, D. K.; Rabuck, A. D.; Raghavachari, K.; Foresman, J. B.; Cioslowski, J.; Ortiz, J. V.; Stefanov, B. B.; Liu, G.; Liashenko, A.; Piskorz, P.; Komaromi, I.; Gomperts, R.; Martin, R. L.; Fox, D. J.; Keith, T.; Al-Laham, M. A.; Peng, C. Y.; Nanayakkara, A.; Gonzalez, C.; Challacombe, M.; Gill, P. M. W.; Johnson, B. G.; Chen, W.; Wong, M. W.; Andres, J. L.; Head-Gordon, M.; Replogle, E. S.; Pople, J. A. Gaussian 98, revision A.9; Gaussian Inc.: Pittsburgh, PA.
59. Rankin, K. N.; Sulea, T.; Purisima, E. O. On the transferability of hydration-parametrized continuum electrostatics models to solvated binding calculations. J. Comput. Chem. 2003, 24, 954-962.
60. Onufriev, A.; Case, D. A.; Bashford, D. Effective Born radii in the generalized Born approximation: the importance of being perfect. J. Comput. Chem. 2002, 23, 1297-1304.
61. Nina, M.; Beglov, D.; Roux, B. Atomic radii for continuum electrostatics calculations based on molecular dynamics free energy simulations. J. Phys. Chem. B 1997, 101, 5239-5248.
62. Banavali, N. K.; Roux, B. Atomic radii for continuum electrostatics calculations on nucleic acids. J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106, 11026-11035.