Speaker meaning, what is said, and what is implicated

Nous

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 228-248

  Saul, Jennifer M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750703779     PISSN: 00294624     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1468-0068.00369     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Bach, Kent. 1994. Conversational Impliciture. Mind and Language 9: 124-62.
2. Blackburn, Simon. 1984. Spreading the Word. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Davidson, Donald. 1986. A Nice Derangement of Epitaphs. In Truth and Interpretation: Perspectives on the Philosophy of Donald Davidson,edited by Ernest LePore.
4. Davis, Wayne. 1998. Conversational Implicature: Intention, Convention and Principle in the Failure of Gricean Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Donnellan, Keith. 1966. Reference and Definite Descriptions. The Philosophical Review 75: 281-304.
6. Donnellan, Keith. 1979. Speaker Reference, Descriptions, and Anaphora. In Contemporary) Perspectives in the Philosophy of Language, edited by T.E. Uehling, P. A. French, H.K. Wett-stein. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 28-43.
7. Grice, H. P. 1961. The Causal Theory of Perception. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 35 (suppl.) 121-52.
8. Grice, H. P. 1989. Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9. Horn, L. 1992. The Said and the Unsaid. Working Papers in Linguistics. Columbus, OH, 163-192.
10. Kripke, Saul. 1977. Speaker's Reference and Semantic Reference. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 2: 255-276.
11. Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
12. Neale, Stephen. 1990. Descriptions. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
13. Neale, Stephen. 1992. Paul Grice and the Philosophy of Language. Linguistics and Philosophy 15: 509-559