Introduction to the special issue, part two: It's about the what, the how well, and the why

Psychology in the Schools

Volumn 43, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 829-834

  Mather, Nancy ^a   Kaufman, Nadeen ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750520509     PISSN: 00333085     EISSN: 15206807     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pits.20199     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. Cruickshank, W.M. (1977). Least-restrictive placement: Administrative wishful thinking. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 10, 193-194.
2. Foorman, B., & Ciancio, D. (2005). Screening for secondary intervention: Concept and context. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 494-499.
3. Fuchs, D., Mock, D., Morgan, P.L., & Young, C.L. (2003). Responsiveness-to-intervention: Definitions, evidence, and implications for the learning disabilities construct. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 157-171.
4. Fuchs, L.S., & Vaughn, S.R. (2005). Response-to-intervention as a framework for the identification of learning disabilities. Trainer's Forum: Periodical of the Trainers of School Psychologists, 25, 12-19.
5. Gallagher, J.J. (1966). Children with developmental imbalances: A psychoeducational definition. In W.M. Cruickshank (Ed.), The teacher of brain-injured children (pp. 23-43). New York: Syracuse University Press.
6. Huff, L. (2005). President's message. NASP Communique, 33, 2-3.
7. Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 (IDEA), Pub. L. No. 108-446, 118 Stat. 2647 (2004). [Amending 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400 et seq.].
8. Kaufman, A.S., & Kaufman, N.L. (2001). Assessment of specific learning disabilities in the new millennium: Issues, conflicts, and controversies. In A.S. Kaufman & N.L. Kaufman (Eds.), Specific learning disabilities: Psychological assessment and evaluation (pp. 433-461). Cambridge Monographs in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
9. Kaufman, A.S., Lichtenberger, E.O., Fletcher-Janzen, E., & Kaufman, N.L. (2005). Essentials of the K-ABC-II Assessment. New York: Wiley.
10. Kavale, K.A. (2005). Identifying specific learning disability: Is responsiveness to intervention the answer? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 553-562.
11. Learning Disabilities Roundtable. (2005). Comments and recommendations on regulatory issues under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, Public Law 108-446. Retrieved February 28, 2005, from http://www.ncld.org/advocacy/pdf/2004LDRoundtableRecs.pdf
12. Martin, R. (2005). The future of learning disabilities as federal laws change again. Learning Disability Quarterly, 28, 144-146.
13. Mastropieri, M.A., & Scruggs, T.E. (2005). Feasibility and consequences of response to intervention: Examination of the issues and scientific evidence as a model for the identification of individuals with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 525-531.
14. Mather, N., & Woodcock, R.W. (2001). In A.S. Kaufman & N.L. Kaufman (Eds.), Specific learning disabilities and difficulties in children and adolescents: Psychological assessment and evaluation (pp. 55-96). Cambridge Monographs in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
15. Monroe, M. (1932). Children who cannot read. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16. National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities. (2005). Responsiveness to intervention and learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 28, 249-260.
17. Reschly, D.J. (2005a). Learning disabilities identification: Primary intervention, secondary intervention, and then what? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 510-515.
18. Reschly, D.J. (2005b). Child outcomes and school psychology service delivery: Response to Naglieri. NASP Communique, 33, 20.
19. Semrud-Clikeman, M. (2005). Neuropsychological aspects for evaluating learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 563-568.
20. Speece, D.L. (2005). Hitting the moving target known as reading development: Some thoughts on screening children for secondary interventions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 487-493.
21. Zach, L.J. (2005). Déjà vu all over again: The current controversy over the identification of learning disability. The School Psychologist, 59, 151-155.