Contextual barriers to successful reentry of recovering drug offenders

Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 365-374

  Sung, Hung En ^a   Richter, Linda ^b  

^a Police Science   (United States)

^b Yale School of Medicine   (United States)

Author keywords

Diversion; Drug abuse treatment; Recidivism; Recovering offenders; Reentry

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG ABUSE; DRUG DEPENDENCE TREATMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; JOB ACCOMMODATION; LONG TERM CARE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OFFENDER; POLICY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECIDIVISM; RESIDENTIAL CARE; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; UNEMPLOYMENT; VOCATIONAL EDUCATION; WORK;

ADULT; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CRIME; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LONG-TERM CARE; MALE; MOTIVATION; NEW YORK CITY; PRISONERS; RECURRENCE; REHABILITATION, VOCATIONAL; RESIDENTIAL TREATMENT; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; SOCIAL ADJUSTMENT; STATISTICS; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS; UNEMPLOYMENT; VOCATIONAL EDUCATION;

EID: 33750456958     PISSN: 07405472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2006.05.010     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Anglin M.D., and Perrochet B. Drug use and crime: A historical review of research conducted by the UCLA drug abuse research center. Substance Use and Misuse 33 (1998) 1871-1914
2. Banks D., and Gottfredson D.C. Participation in drug treatment court and time to rearrest. Justice Quarterly 21 (2004) 637-658
3. Belenko S., Foltz C., Lang A., and Sung H.-E. Recidivism among high-risk drug felons: A longitudinal analysis following residential treatment. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation 40 (2004) 105-132
4. Belenko S., Patapis N., and French M.T. Economic benefits of drug treatment: A critical review of evidence for policy makers (2005, February), Treatment Research Institute at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
5. Berger D.E., and Marelich W.D. Legal and social control of alcohol-impaired driving in California: 1983-1994. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 58 (1997) 518-523
6. Blumstein A. Youth, guns, and violent crime. Future of Children 12 (2002) 39-53
7. In: Blumstein A., and Wallman J. (Eds). The crime drop in America (2000), Cambridge University Press, New York
8. Bottoms A., Shapland J., Costello A., Holmes D., and Muir G. Toward desistance: Theoretical underpinnings for an empirical study. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice 43 (2004) 368-389
9. Bouchery E., and Harwood H. Economic costs of drug abuse in the United States, 1992-1998 (2001, September), Office of National Drug Control Policy, Washington, DC
10. Bowling B. Rise and fall of New York murder: Zero tolerance or crack's decline?. British Journal of Criminology 39 (1999) 531-554
11. Burdon W.M., Messina N.P., and Prendergast M.L. California Treatment Expansion Initiative: Aftercare participation, recidivism, and predictors of outcomes. Prison Journal 84 (2004) 61-80
12. Bushway S., and Reuter P. Labor markets and crime. In: Wilson J.Q., and Petersilia J. (Eds). Crime: Public policies for crime control (2002), ICS Press, San Francisco 191-224
13. Chaiken M.R., and Chaiken J.M. Adult drug abuse treatment by criminal justice stage: A literature review (2003), Caliber Associates, Fairfax, VA
14. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. (1988), Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
15. Cork D. Examining space-time interaction in city-level homicide data: Crack markets and the diffusion of guns among youth. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 15 (1999) 379-406
16. Corman H., and Morcan H.M. A time-series analysis of crime, deterrence, and drug abuse in New York City. The American Economic Review 90 (2000) 584-604
17. Curtis R. The improbable transformation of inner-city neighborhoods: Crime, violence, drugs, and youth in the 1990s. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 88 (1998) 1233-1276
18. Deschenes E.P., Anglin M.D., and Speckart G. Narcotics addiction: Related criminal careers, social and economic costs. Journal of Drug Issues 21 (1991) 383-411
19. Doob A.N., and Webster C.N. Sentence severity and crime: Accepting the null hypothesis. Crime and Justice 30 (2003) 143-195
20. Dynia P., and Sung H.-E. Safety and effectiveness of diverting felony drug offenders to residential treatment as measured by recidivism. Criminal Justice Policy Review 11 (2000) 299-311
21. Edwards S.J.L., Lilford R.J., Braunholtz D., and Jackson J. Why "underpowered" trials are not necessarily unethical. Lancet 350 (1997) 804-807
22. Eisenberg M. Three-year recidivism tracking of offenders participating in substance abuse treatment programs (1999), Texas Criminal Justice Policy Council, Austin, TX
23. Farabee D., Hser Y.-I., Anglin M.D., and Huang D. Recidivism among an early cohort of California's proposition 36 offenders. Criminology and Public Policy 3 (2004) 563-584
24. Farrall S. Rethinking what works with offenders: Probation, social context and desistance from crime (2002), Willan Publishing, Portland, OR
25. Field G. Effects of intensive treatment on reducing the criminal recidivism of addicted offenders. Federal Probation 53 (1989) 51-56
26. Goldstein P.J., Brownstein H.H., Ryan P.J., and Bellucci P.A. Crack and homicide in New York City: A case study in the epidemiology of violence. In: Reinarman C., and Levine H.G. (Eds). Crack in America: Demon drugs and social justice (1997), University of California Press, Berkeley, CA 113-130
27. Harrell A., and Roman J. Reducing drug use and crime among offenders: The impact of graduated sanctions. Journal of Drug Issues 31 (2001) 207-231
28. Hiller M.L., Knight K., and Simpson D.D. Prison-based substance abuse treatment, residential aftercare and recidivism. Addiction 94 (2000) 833-842
29. Hox J.J., and Kreft I.G. Multilevel analysis methods. Sociological Methods and Research 22 (1994) 283-299
30. Klein S.P., and Caggiano M.N. The prevalence, predictability, and policy implications of recidivism (1986, August), RAND, Santa Monica, CA
31. Leukefeld C., McDonald H.S., Staton M., Mateyoke-Scrivner A., Webster M., Logan T.K., et al. Employment intervention for drug-abusing offenders. Federal Probation 67 (2003) 27-31
32. Lipton D.S. The effectiveness of treatment for drug abusers under criminal justice supervision (1995), National Institute of Justice, Washington, DC
33. Logan J.A. Opportunity and choice in socially structured labor markets. American Journal of Sociology 102 (1996) 114-160
34. Lurigio A.J. Drug treatment availability and effectiveness: Studies of the general and criminal justice populations. Criminal Justice and Behavior 27 (2000) 495-528
35. Maruna S., Immarigeon R., and LeBel T.P. Ex-offender reintegration: Theory and practice. In: Maruna S., and Immarigeon R. (Eds). After crime and punishment: Pathways to offender reintegration (2004), Willan Publishing, Portland, OR 3-26
36. Maxwell S.R., and Gray M.K. Deterrence: Testing the effects of perceived sanction certainty on probation violations. Sociological Inquiry 70 (2000) 117-136
37. Paternoster R., and Piquero A. Reconceptualizing deterrence: An empirical test of personal and vicarious experiences. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 32 (1995) 251-286
38. Peters R.H., and Murrin M.R. Effectiveness of treatment-based drug courts in reducing criminal recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior 27 (2000) 72-96
39. Petersilia J. When prisoners come home: Parole and prisoner reentry (2003), Oxford University Press, New York
40. Pratt A. Summary of the results of substance abuse treatment programs in five county jails: Studying recidivism two or more years after treatment. American Jails 12 (1998) 59-61
41. Prendergast M.L., Hall A.H., Wexler H.K., Melnick G., and Cao Y. Amity prison-based therapeutic community: 5-Year outcomes. Prison Journal 84 (2004) 36-60
42. Raudenbush S.W., and Bryk A.S. Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2001), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
43. Richards S.C., and Jones R.S. Beating the perpetual incarceration machine: Overcoming structural impediments to re-entry. In: Maruna S., and Immrigeon R. (Eds). After crime and punishment: Pathways to offender reintegration (2004), Willan Publishing, Portland, OR 201-232
44. Schulz K.F., and Grime D.A. Sample size calculations in randomised trials: Mandatory and mystical. Lancet 365 (2005) 1348-1353
45. Sung H.-E. Rehabilitating felony drug offenders through job development: A look into a prosecutor-led diversion program. Prison Journal 81 (2001) 271-286
46. Sung H.-E. Differential impact of deterrence vs. rehabilitation as drug intervention on recidivism after 36 months. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation 37 (2003) 95-108
47. Sung H.-E., and Belenko S. Failure after success: Why do some mandated clients recidivate after treatment completion?. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Chicago, November 13 (2002)
48. Topalli V., Wright R., and Fornango R. Drug dealers, robbery and retaliation: Vulnerability, deterrence and the contagion of violence. British Journal of Criminology 42 (2002) 337-351
49. Travis J., Solomon A., and Waul M. From prison to home: The dimensions and consequences of prisoner reentry (2001, June), The Urban Institute, Washington, DC
50. Turley A., Thornton T., Johnson C., and Azzolino S. Jail drug and alcohol treatment program reduces recidivism in nonviolent offenders: A longitudinal study of Monroe County, New York's Jail Treatment Drug and Alcohol Program. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 48 (2004) 721-728
51. Van Stelle K.R., Mauser E., and Moberg D.P. Recidivism to the criminal justice system of substance-abusing offenders diverted into treatment. Crime and Delinquency 40 (1994) 175-196
52. Ventura L.A., and Lamber E.G. Recidivism 12 months after TASC. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation 39 (2004) 63-82
53. White L.W. Toward a new recovery movement: Historical reflections on recovery, treatment, and advocacy. Paper presented at Recovery Community Support Program Conference, the Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, Arlington, VA (2000, April)
54. Wooldredge J., and Thistlethwaite A. Court dispositions and rearrest for intimate assault. Crime and Delinquency 51 (2005) 75-102
55. Young D., and Belenko S. Program retention and perceived coercion in three models of mandatory drug treatment. Journal of Drug Issues 32 (2002) 297-328