Differential impact of deterrence vs. Rehabilitation as drug interventions on recidivism after 36 months

Journal of Offender Rehabilitation

Volumn 37, Issue 3-4, 2003, Pages 95-108

  Sung, Hung En ^a  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

Deterrence; Diversion; Drug offenders; Drug treatment; DTAP; Recidivism; Rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

EID: 30344433842     PISSN: 10509674     EISSN: 15408558     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J076v37n03_05     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Beccaria, C. (1986). On crimes and punishments. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
2. Belenko, S. R. (2000). “A middle ground?” In S. R. Belenko (Ed.), Drugs and drug policy in America (p. 364). Wesport, CT: Greenwood.
3. Belenko, S. R. (2001). Research on drug courts: A critical review 2001 update. New York: The National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse.
4. Benedict, W. R., Huff-Corzine, L., & Corzine, J. (1998). “Clean up and go straight”: Effects of drug treatment on recidivism among felony probationers. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 22,169-187.
5. Bentham, J. (1988). A fragment on government. New York: Cambridge University Press.
6. Caulkins, J. P., Rydell, C. P., Schwabe, W. L., & Chiesa, J. (1997). Mandatory minimum drug sentences: Throwing away the key or the taxpayers’ money? Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
7. Dynia, P. A. & Sung, H. (2000). Safety and effectiveness of diverting felony drug offenders to residential treatment as measured by recidivism. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 11, 299-311.
8. Eisenberg, M. (1999). Three year recidivism tracking of offenders participating in substance abuse treatment programs. Rockville, MD: National Institute of Justice.
9. Fagan, J. A. (1994). Do criminal sanctions deter drug crimes? In D. L. MacKenzie and C. D. Uchida (Eds.), Drugs and crime: Evaluating public policy initiatives (pp. 188214). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10. Ferri, E. (1899). Criminal sociology. New York: D. Appleton & Co.
11. Gendreau, P., Little, T., & Goggin, C. (1996). Meta-analysis of the predictors of adult offender recidivism: What works! Criminology, 34, 575-607.
12. Gendreau, P., Goggin, C., & Cullen, F. T. (2000). Effects of prison sentences on recidivism. Ottawa: Canada Minister of Public Works and Government Services.
13. Gerstein, D. R., & Harwood, H. J. (1990). Treating drug problems, Vol. 1. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
14. Hiller, M. L., Knight, K., Broome, K. M., & Simpson, D. D. (1998). Legal pressure and treatment retention in a national sample of long-term residential programs. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 25, 463-481.
15. Inciardi, J. A., McBride, D. C., & Rivers, J. E. (1996). Drug control and the courts. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16. Inciardi, J. A., Martin, S. S., Butzin, C. A., Hooper, R. M., & Harrison, L. D. (1997). An effective model of prison-based treatment for drug-involved offenders. Journal of Drug Issues, 27, 261-278.
17. Klein, S. P. & Caggiano, M. N. (1986). The prevalence, predictability, and policy implications of recidivism. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
18. Knight, K., Hiller, M., & Simpson, D. D. (1999). Prison-based treatment assessment (PTA): Final activity report. Rockville, MD: National Institute of Justice.
19. Lang, M. A., & Belenko, S. R. (2000). Predicting retention in a residential drug treatment alternative to prison program. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 19, 145-160.
20. Lombroso, C. (1918). Crime: Its causes and remedies. Boston, MA: Little Brown.
21. MacKenzie, D. L. (1994). Drug policy initiatives: The next 25 years. In D. L. MacKenzie and C. D. Uchida (Eds.), Drugs and crime: Evaluating public policy initiatives (pp. 283-290). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22. Maxwell, S. R., & Gray, M. K. (2000). Deterrence: Testing the effects of perceived sanction certainty on probation violations. Sociological Inquiry, 70, 117-136.
23. Menard, S. (1995). Applied logistic regression. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24. Mumola, C. J. (1999). Substance abuse and treatment, state and federal prisoners, 1997. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
25. Mumola, C. J. (1998). Substance abuse and treatment of adults on probation, 1995. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
26. National Institute on Drug Abuse (1999). Principles of drug addiction treatment: A research-based guide. Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
27. Nolan, J. L. (2001). Reinventing justice: The American drug court movement. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
28. Odegard, E., & Amundsen, A. (1998). Measuring special deterrence effects on drug offenders. Studies on crime and crime prevention, 7, 239-258.
29. Peters, R. H., & Murrin, M. R. (2000). Effectiveness of treatment-based drug courts in reducing criminal recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27, 72-96.
30. Ross, H. L. (1991). License deprivation as a drunk-driver sanction. Alcohol, Drugs and Driving, 7, 63-69.
31. Taxman, F. S., & Piquero, A. (1998). On preventing drunk driving recidivism: An examination of rehabilitation and punishment approaches. Journal of Criminal Justice, 26, 129-143.
32. Trone, J., & Young, D. (1996). Bridging drug treatment and criminal justice. New York: Vera Institute of Justice.
33. Walker, S. (2000). Sense and nonsense about crime and drugs: A policy guide. 5th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
34. Wexler, H. K., Falkin, G. P., & Lipton, D. S. (1990). Outcome evaluation of a prison therapeutic community for substance abuse treatment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17, 71-92.
35. Wilson, D. J. (2000). Drug use, testing, and treatment in jails. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
36. Yu, J. (1994). Punishment celerity and severity: Testing a specific deterrence model on drunk driving recidivism. Journal of Criminal Justice, 22, 355-366.
37. Zamble, E., & Quinsey, V. L. (1997). The criminal recidivism process. New York: Cambridge University Press.