Participation in drug treatment court and time to rearrest

Justice Quarterly

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 637-658

  Banks, Duren ^a   Gottfredson, Denise C ^b  

^a ICF INTERNATIONAL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 28344438454     PISSN: 07418825     EISSN: 17459109     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07418820400095931     Document Type: Review

References (29)

1. Anglin, M. D., & Hser, Y. (1990). Treatment of drug abuse. In M. Tonry & J. Q. Wilson (Eds.), Crime and Justice: Vol. 13. Drugs and crime (pp. 393-460). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2. Anspach, D. F., & Ferguson, A. S. (1999). Cumberland County's drug court program: An evaluation report of Project Exodus. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Drug Courts Program Office.
3. Banks, D., & Gottfredson, D. C. (2003). The effects of drug treatment and supervision on time to rearrest among drug treatment court participants. Journal of Drug Issues, 33, 385-412.
4. Bar Association of Baltimore City. (1992). The drug crisis and underfunding of the justice system in Baltimore City: Supplemental report of the Russell Committee 28. Author.
5. Belenko, S. R. (1998a). Behind bars: Substance abuse and America's prison population. New York: The National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University.
6. Belenko, S. R. (1998b). Research on drug courts: A critical review. National Drug Court Institute Review, 1, 1-42.
7. Belenko, S. R. (1999). Research on drug courts: A critical review. 1999 Update. National Drug Court Institute Review, 2, 1-58.
8. Deschenes, E. P., Turner, S. F., & Greenwood, P. W. (1995). Drug court or probation? An experimental evaluation of Maricopa County's drug court. The Justice System Journal, 18, 55-73.
9. Drug Strategies. (1999). Drug courts: A revolution in criminal justice. Washington, DC: Author.
10. Finigan, M. W. (1998). An outcome program evaluation of the Multnomah County S.T.O.P. drug diversion program. West Linn, OR: State Justice Institute.
11. General Accounting Office. (1998). Drug abuse: Studies show treatment is effective, but benefits may be overstated. Washington, DC: Author.
12. Goldkamp, J. S., & Weiland, D. (1993). Assessing the impact of Dade County's felony drug court. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice.
13. Gottfredson, D. C., & Exum, M. L. (2002). The Baltimore City Drug Court: One-year results from a randomized study. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 39, 337-356.
14. Gottfredson, D. C., Coblentz, K., & Harmon, M. A. (1997). A short-term outcome evaluation of the Baltimore City drug treatment court program. American Probation and Parole Association Perspectives, Winter, 33-38.
15. Gottfredson, D. C., Najaka, S. S., & Kearley, B. W. (2003). Effectiveness of drug treatment courts: Evidence from a randomized clinical trial. Criminology and Public Policy, 2, 171-196.
16. Gottfredson, D. C., Najaka, S. S., Kearley, B. W., & Rocha, C. M. (2003). The Baltimore City Drug Treatment Court: Final evaluation report. College Park, MD: The University of Maryland.
17. Granfield, R., Eby, C., & Brewster, T. (1998). An examination of the Denver Drug Court: The impact of a treatment-oriented drug offender system. Law and Policy, 20, 183-202.
18. Harrell, A. V., Cavanagh, S., & Roman, J. (1998). Final report: Findings from the evaluation of the D.C. Superior Court Drug Intervention Program. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
19. Hughes, T., & Wilson, D. J. (2003). Reentry trends in the United States: Inmates returning to the community after serving time in prison. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
20. Lipton, D. S. (1996). Prison-based therapeutic communities: Their success with drug-abusing offenders. National Institute of Justice Journal, 230, 12-20.
21. MacKenzie, D. L. (1997). Criminal justice and crime prevention. In L. W. Sherman, D. Gottfredson, D. MacKenzie, J. Eck, P. Reuter & S. Bushway (Eds.), Preventing Crime: What Works, What Doesn't, What's Promising (pp. 9-1 through 9-76). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice.
22. Mieczkowski, T., Anglin, M. D., Coletti, S., Johnson, B. D., Nadelman, B. A., & Wish, E. D. (1992). Responding to America's drug problems: Strategies for the 1990s. Journal of Urban Affairs, 14, 337-357.
23. ONDCP Drug Policy Information Clearinghouse. (1998). Drug treatment in the criminal justice system. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
24. Peters, R. H., & Murrin, M. R. (1998). Evaluation of treatment-based drug courts in Florida's First Judicial Circuit. Tampa: University of South Florida Department of Mental Health Law and Policy.
25. Roberts-Gray, C. (1994). Process evaluation: SHORT Program, 1993-1994. Austin, TX: Resource Network.
26. Sechrest, D. K., Shichor, D., Artist, K., & Briceno, G. (1998). The Riverside County drug court: Final research report for the Riverside County Probation Department, Riverside County, California. San Bernardino, CA: California State University, Criminal Justice Department.
27. Truitt, L., Rhodes, W. M., Seeherman, A. M., Carrigan, K. & Finn, P. (2000). Phase I: Case studies and impact evaluations of Escambia County (Pensacola), Florida and Jackson County (Kansas City), Missouri drug courts. Executive summary. Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates, Inc.
28. Wilhelm, D. F., & Turner, N. R. (2002). Issues in brief: Is the budget crisis changing the way we look at sentencing and incarceration? New York: Vera Institute of Justice.
29. Wish, E. D., & Johnson, B. D. (1986). The impact of substance abuse on criminal careers. In A. Blumstein, J. Cohen, J. A. Roth, and C. A. Visher (Eds.), Criminal careers and "career criminals" (Vol. 2) (pp. 52-88). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.