Recidivism 12 months after TASC

Journal of Offender Rehabilitation

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 63-82

  Ventura, Lois A ^a   Lambert, Eric G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO   (United States)

Author keywords

Adult drug treatment; Community substance abuse treatment; Recidivism; Treatment Alternatives to Street Crime (TASC)

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750458289     PISSN: 10509674     EISSN: 15408558     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J076v39n01_04     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Anglin, M. D., Longshore, D., & Turner, S. (1999). Treatment alternatives to street crime: An evaluation of five programs. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 26, 168-195.
2. Anglin, M. D., Longshore, D., Turner, S., McBride D., Inciardi, J., & Prendergast, M. (1996). Studies of the functioning and effectiveness of treatment alternatives to street crime (TASC) programs [Final report]. Los Angeles: UCLA Drug Abuse Research Center.
3. Ball, A., Rosen, L., Mueck, J. A., & Nurco, D. (1981). The criminality of heroin addicts: When addicted and when off opiates. In J. A. Inciardi (Ed.), Drugs-crime connection (pp. 39-65). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
4. Ball, J., Shaffer, J., & Nurco, D. (1983). The day-to-day criminality of heroin addicts in Baltimore: A study in the continuity of offence rates. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 12, 119-142.
5. Benedict, W. R., Huff-Corzine, L., & Corzine, J. (1998). “Clean up and go straight”: Effects of drug treatment on recidivism among felony probationers. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 22, 169-187.
6. Cantor, D. (1999). Drug involvement among offender populations. In R. M. Bray & M. E. Marsden (Eds.), Drug use in metropolitan America (pp. 161-193). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7. Collins, J. J., Hubbard, R. L., Rachal, J. V., Cavanaugh, E. R., & Craddock, S. G. (1982). Criminal justice clients in drug treatment. Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute.
8. Conklin, J. E. (2001). Criminology (7th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
9. De Li, S., Priu, H. D., & MacKenzie, D. L. (2000). Drug involvement, lifestyles, and criminal activities among probationers. Journal of Drug Issues, 30, 593-619.
10. Dowdall, G., Babbie, E., & Halley, F. (1997). Data analysis using Spssfor Windows. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
11. Feldkamp, R. H. (1995). Correctional options: Treatment initiatives. Corrections Today, 57 (6), 1-6.
12. Gainey, R. R., Payne, B. K., & O’Toole, M. (2000). The relationships between time in jail, time on electronic monitoring, and recidivism: An event history analysis of a jail-based program. Justice Quarterly, 17, 733-752.
13. Glaze, L. E. (2002). Probation and parole in the United States, 2001. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
14. Gottfredson, M. & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
15. Harrison, L. D. (2001). The revolving prison door for drug involved offenders: Challenges and opportunities. Crime and Delinquency, 47, 462-485.
16. Hepburn, J. R., & Albonetti, C. A. (1994). Recidivism among drug offenders: A survival analysis of the effects if offender characteristics type of offense and two types of intervention. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 10, 159-179.
17. Herschel, J. D., & McCarthy, B. R. (1983). The TASC drug treatment program connection: Cooperation, co-optation, or corruption of treatment objectives? Journal of Offender Counseling Services and Rehabilitation, 8, 117-130.
18. Hubbard, R. L., Marsden, M. E., Rachal, J. V., Harwood, H. J., Cavanaugh, E. R., & Ginzburg, H. M. (1989). Drug abuse treatment: A national study of effectiveness. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
19. Inciardi, J. A., Martin, S. S., Butzin, C. A., Hooper, R. M., & Harrison, L. D. (1997). An effective model of prison-based treatment for drug-involved offenders. Journal of Drug Issues, 27, 261-278.
20. Latessa, E. J. (1999) What works? Strategic solutions: The International Community Corrections Association examines substance abuse. Arlington, VA: Kirby Lithographic Company.
21. Liao, T. (1994). Interpreting probability models: Logit, probit, and other general linear models. Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, series 07-101. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
22. Lipton, D. S. (1995). The effectiveness of treatment for drug abusers under criminal justice supervision. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
23. Longshore, D., Turner, S., & Anglin, M. D. (1998). Effects of case management on drug users’ risky sex. The Prison Journal, 78, 6-30.
24. MacKenzie, D. L. (2000). Evidence-based corrections: Identifying what works. Crime and Delinquency, 46, 457-471.
25. Mears, D. P., & Kelly, W. R. (2002). Linking process and outcomes in evaluating a statewide drug treatment program for youthful offenders. Crime and Delinquency, 48, 99-115.
26. Mecca, A. M., & Pick, D. J. (1976). Does TASC work? An evaluation of the Marin TASC program documents its effectiveness. Offender Rehabilitation, 1, 67-81.
27. Merrill, J. Alterman, A., Cacciola, J., & Rutherford, M. (1999). Prior treatment history and its impact on criminal recidivism. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 17, 313-319.
28. O’Brien, C. P., & McClelland, T. A. (1996). Myths about treatment of addiction. Lancet, 347, 237-240.
29. Peters, R. H., & Hills, H. A. (1999). Community treatment and supervision strategies for offenders with co-occurring disorders: What works?. In E. J. Latessa (Ed.), What works? Strategic solutions: The International Community Corrections Association examines substance abuse (pp. 81-136). Arlington, VA: Kirby Lithographic Company.
30. Peters, R. H., & Murrin, M. R. (2000). Effectiveness of treatment-based drug courts in reducing criminal recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27, 72-96.
31. Petersillia, J. (1999) A decade of experimenting with intermediate sanctions: What have we learned? Justice Research and Policy: Journal of the Justice Research and Statistical Association, 1, 9-23.
32. Rossi, P., & Freeman, H. (1993). Evaluation: A systematic approach (5th ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
33. Siegal, L. J. (1998). Criminology (6th ed.). Belmont, CA: West/Wadsworth Publishing.
34. Spohn, C., & Holleran, D. (2002) The effects of imprisonment on the recidivism rates of felony offenders: A focus on drug offenders. Criminology, 40, 329-357.
35. Stanz, R., & Tewksbury, R. (2000). Predictors of success and recidivism in a home incarceration program. The Prison Journal, 80, 326-344.
36. Tabachnick, B., & Fidell, L. (1996). Using multivariate statistics (3rd ed.). New York: Harper Collins.
37. Tabachnick, B., & Fidell, L. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
38. Toborg, M. A., Levin, D. R., Milkman, R. H., & Couter, L. J. (1976). Treatment alternatives to street crime (TASC) projects: National evaluation program, phase I summary report. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
39. Wellisch, J., Prendergast, M., & Anglin, M. D. (1993). Criminal justice and drug treatment systems linkages: Federal promotion of interagency collaboration in the 1970s. Contemporary Drug Problems, 20, 611-650.
40. Wenzel, S. L., Longshore, D., Turner, S., & Ridgely, M. S. (2001). Drug courts: A bridge between criminal justice and health services. Journal of Criminal Justice, 29, 241-253.
41. Wexler, H. K., Melnick, G., Lowe, L., & Peters, J. (1999). Three-year reincarceration outcomes for Amity in-prison therapeutic community and aftercare in California. The Prison Journal, 79, 321-336.