The California Treatment Expansion Initiative: Aftercare Participation, Recidivism, and Predictors of Outcomes

The Prison Journal

Volumn 84, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 61-80

  Burdon, William M ^a   Messina, Nena P ^a   Prendergast, Michael L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

corrections; motivation; recidivism; substance abuse treatment; treatment retention

Indexed keywords

EID: 2442699062     PISSN: 00328855     EISSN: 15527522     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0032885503262455     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Broome, K. M., Knight, K., Joe, G. W., & Simpson, D. D. (1996). Evaluating the drug-abusing probationer: Clinical interview versus self-administered assessment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 23 (4), 593-606.
2. California State Association of Counties (2003). California county fact book 2003. Retrieved September 5, 2003, from http://www.cicg.org/publications/profiles/factbook.php
3. De La Rosa, M. R., & White, M. S. (2001). A review of the role of social support systems in the drug use behavior of Hispanics. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 33 (3), 233-240.
4. De Leon, G., Melnick, G., Kressel, D., & Jainchill, N. (2000). Circumstance, motivation, readiness, and suitability (the CMRS scales): Predicting retention in therapeutic community treatment. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 20 (4) 495-515.
5. Farabee, D., & Fredlund, E. (1996). Self-reported drug use among recently admitted jail inmates: Estimating prevalence and treatment needs. Substance Use & Abuse, 31 (4), 423-435.
6. Field, G. (1998). From the institution to the community. Corrections Today, 60, 6, 94-97, 113.
7. Gossop, M., Marsden, J., Stewart, D., & Rolfe, A. (1999). Treatment retention and 1 year outcomes for residential programmes in England. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 57 (2), 89-98.
8. Hiller, M. L., Knight, K., Leukefeld, C., & Simpson, D. D. (2002). Motivation as a predictor of therapeutic engagement in mandated residential substance abuse treatment. Criminal Justice & Behavior, 29 (1), 56-75.
9. Inciardi, J. A. (1996). The therapeutic community: An effective model for corrections-based drug abuse treatment. In K. Early (ed.), Drug treatment behind bars: Prison based strategies for change. Westport, CT: Praeger.
10. Joe, G. W., Simpson, D. D., & Broome, K. M. (1998). Effects of readiness for drug abuse treatment on client retention and assessment of process. Addiction, 93 (8), 1177-1190.
11. Knight, K., Holcom, M., & Simpson, D. D. (1994). TCU psychosocial functioning and motivation scales: Manual on psychometric properties. Fort Worth: Texas Christian University, Institute of Behavioral Research.
12. Knight, K., Simpson, D. D., Hiller, & M. L. (1999). Three-year reincarceration outcomes for in-prison therapeutic community treatment in Texas. Prison Journal, 79 (3), 337-351.
13. Lipton, D. S. (1995). The effectiveness of treatment for drug abusers under criminal justice supervision (NIJ Research report). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice.
14. Martin, S. S., Butzin, C. A., Saum, C. A., & Inciardi, J. A. (1999). Three-year outcomes of therapeutic community treatment for drug-involved offenders in Delaware: From prison to work release to aftercare. Prison Journal, 79 (3), 294-320.
15. Melnick, G., De Leon, G., Thomas, G., Kressel, D., & Wexler, H. K. (2001). Treatment process in prison therapeutic communities: Motivation, participation, and outcome. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 27 (4), 633-650.
16. Prendergast, M. L., Wellisch, J., & Wong, M. (1996). Residential treatment for women parolees following prison drug treatment: Treatment experiences, needs and services, outcomes. Prison Journal, 76 (3), 253-274.
17. Simpson, D. D. (2001). Modeling treatment process and outcomes. Addiction, 96, 207-211.
18. Simpson, D. D., Joe, G. W., Rowan-Szal, G. A., & Greener, J. M. (1997). Drug abuse treatment process components that improve retention. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 14 (6), 565-572.
19. Warner, B. D., & Leukefeld, C. G. (2001). Rural-urban differences in substance use and treatment utilization among prisoners. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 27 (2), 265-280.
20. Westhuis, D. J., Gwaltney, L., & Hayashi, R. (2001). Outpatient cocaine abuse treatment: Predictors of success. Journal of Drug Education, 31 (2), 171-183.
21. Wexler, H. K. (1996). The Amity prison TC evaluation: Inmate profiles and reincarceration outcomes. Presentation at the California Department of Corrections, Youth and Adult Correctional Agency, Sacramento, November 1996.
22. Wexler, H. K., De Leon, G., Kressel, D., & Peters, J. (1999). The amity prison TC evaluation: Reincarceration outcomes. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 26 (2), 147-167.
23. Wexler, H. K., Falkin, G. P., & Lipton, D. S. (1990). Outcome evaluation of a prison therapeutic community for substance abuse treatment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17 (1), 71-92.
24. Wexler, H. K., Falkin, G. P., Lipton, D. S., & Rosenblum, A. B. (1992). Outcome evaluation of a prison therapeutic community for substance abuse treatment. In C. G. Leukefeld & F. M. Tims (eds.), Drug abuse treatment in prisons and jails (NIDA Research Monograph 118, DHHS Pub No. [ADM] 92-1884, pp. 156-175) Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
25. Wexler, H., & Love, C. (1994). Therapeutic communities in prison. In F. Tims, G. De Leon, & N. Jainchill (eds.), Therapeutic community: Advances in research and application (NIDA Research Monograph Series 144, pp. 181-208). Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
26. Wexler, H. K., Melnick, G., Lowe, L., & Peters, J. (1999). Three-year reincarceration outcomes for Amity in-prison therapeutic community and aftercare in California. Prison Journal, 79 (3), 312-336.