From imagination to application: Making the case for the general method of theory-building research in applied disciplines

Human Resource Development International

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 227-259

  Storberg Walker, Julia ^a  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Conceptual development; Human resource development; Multi paradigm research; Theory building

Indexed keywords

EID: 33749656154     PISSN: 13678868     EISSN: 14698374     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13678860600616420     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Barley, S. R., 1990. Images of imaging:notes on doing longitudinal field work. Organization Science, 1 (3):220–247.
2. Blalock, H. M., 1969. Theory Construction, Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
3. Bourgeois, L. J., III. 1979. Toward a method of middle-range theorizing. Academy of Management Review, 4 (3):443–447.
4. Burrell, G., and Morgan, G., 1979. Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis, London:Heinemann Educational Books.
5. Christensen, C. M., and Raynor, M. E., 2003. Why hard nosed executives should care about management theory. Harvard Business Review, 81 (9):130–136.
6. Cohen, B. P., 1980. Developing Sociological Knowledge:Theory and Method, Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
7. Denzin, N. K., and Lincoln, Y. S., 2000. Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2nd edn, Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
8. Dooley, L. M., 2002. Case study research and theory building. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 4 (3):335–354.
9. Dubin, R., 1978. Theory Building, New York:The Free Press.
10. Dubin, R., 1983. “ Theory building in applied areas ”. In Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Edited by:Dunnette, M., 17–39. New York:Wiley.
11. Egan, T. M., 2002. Grounded theory research and theory building. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 4 (3):277–295.
12. Eisenhardt, K. M., 1989. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14 (4):532–550.
13. Eisenhardt, K. M., 1995. “ Building theories from case study research ”. In Longitudinal Field Research Methods:Studying Processes of Organizational Change, Edited by:Huber, G. P., and Van de Ven, A. H., 65–90. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage Publishing.
14. Fenwick, T., 2005. Conceptions of critical HRD:dilemmas for theory and practice. Human Resource Development International, 8 (2):225–238.
15. Fleetwood, S., 2005. Ontology in organization and management studies:a critical realist perspective. Organization, 12 (2):197–222.
16. Gioia, D. A., and Pitre, E., 1989. Multiple perspectives on theory building. Academy of Management Review, 15 (4):584–602.
17. Glaser, B., and Strauss, A., 1967. Discovery of Grounded Theory, Chicago, IL:Aldine.
18. Holton, E. F., III. 2003. Where are the theory-building research methods articles?. Human Resource Development Review, 2 (3):227–228.
19. Jick, T. D., 1979. Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods:triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24 (4):602–611.
20. Kaplan, A., 1964. The Conduct of Inquiry, San Francisco, CA:Chandler.
21. Kerlinger, F. N., 1973. Foundations of Behavioral Research, 2nd edn, New York:Holt.
22. Lee, M., 2001. A refusal to define HRD. Human Resource Development International, 4 (3):327–341.
23. Lewis, M. W., 2000. Exploring paradox:toward a more comprehensive guide. Academy of Management Review, 25 (4):760–776.
24. Lewis, M. W., and Grimes, A. J., 1999. Metatriangulation:building theory from multiple paradigms. Academy of Management Review, 24 (4):672–690.
25. Lynham, S., 2002a. The general method of applied theory building research. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 4 (3):221–241.
26. Lynham, S., 2002b. Quantitative research and theory building:Dubin's method. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 4 (3):242–276.
27. McGoldrick, J., Stewart, J., and Watson, S., 2001. Theorizing human resource development. Human Resource Development International, 4 (3):343–356.
28. Mahdjoubi, D., 2001. From grounded theory to grounded model:a review of the diamond model for professional research. Academy of Management Proceedings, Submission #32012
29. Mankin, D. P., 2001. A model for human resource development. Human Resource Development International, 4 (1):65–86.
30. O'Dougherty, D., and Willmott, H., 2001. The question of subjectivity and the labour process. International Studies of Management & Organization, 30 (4):112–132.
31. Patterson, C. H., 1986. Theories of Counseling and Psychotherapy, 4th edn, San Francisco, CA:Harper and Row.
32. Pentland, B. T., 1999. Building process theory with narrative:from description to explanation. Academy of Management Review, 24 (4):711–724.
33. Poole, M. S., and Van de Ven, A. H., 1989. Using paradox to build management and organization theories. Academy of Management Review, 14 (4):562–578.
34. Poole, M. S., and Van de Ven, A. H., eds. 2004. Handbook of Organizational Change and Innovation, New York:Oxford University Press.
35. Poole, M. S., Van de Ven, A. H., Dooley, K., and Holmes, M. E., 2000. Organizational Change and Innovation Processes:Theory and Methods for Research, New York:Oxford University Press.
36. Reed, M., 2005. Reflections on the realist turn in organization and management studies. Journal of Management Studies, 42 (8):1621–1644.
37. Reynolds, B. T., 1971. A Primer in Theory Construction, Indianapolis, IN:Bobbs-Merrill.
38. Sambrook, S., 2000. Talking of HRD. Human Resource Development International, 3 (2):159–178.
39. Storberg-Walker, J., 2003. The evolution of capital theory:a critique of a theory of social capital and implications for HRD. Human Resource Development Review, 1 (4):468–499.
40. Strauss, A., and Corbin, J., 1990. Qualitative Research:Analysis Types and Software Tools, New York:Palmer.
41. Swanson, R. A., 2005. “ The challenge of research in organizations ”. In Research in Organizations:Foundations and Methods of Inquiry, Edited by:Swanson, R. A., and Holton, E. F., III. San Francisco:Berrett Kohler.
42. Torraco, R. J., 2002. Research methods for theory building in applied disciplines:a comparative analysis. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 4 (3):355–376.
43. Torraco, R. J., 2004. Challenges and choices for theoretical research in human resource development. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 15 (2):171–188.
44. Torraco, R. J., 2005. “ Theory building research methods ”. In Research in Organizations:Foundations and Methods of Inquiry, Edited by:Swanson, R. A., and Holton, E. F., III. San Francisco:Berrett-Koehler.
45. Torraco, R. J., and Holton, E. F., III. 2002. A theorist's toolbox. Human Resource Development Review, 1 (1):129–140.
46. Tsoukas, H., 1991. The missing link:a transformational view of metaphors in organizational science. Academy of Management Review, 16 (3):566–585.
47. Turnbull, S., 2002. Social construction research and theory building. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 4 (3):317–334.
48. Van de Ven, A. H., 2003. “ Theory building and research design ”. University of Minnesota, Carlson School of Management. Available at: (accessed 27 April 2003)
49. Van de Ven, A. H., Engaged Scholarship:Creating Knowledge for Science and Practice, Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage. in press
50. Van de Ven, A. H., and Poole, M. S., 1988. “ Paradoxical requirements of a theory of organizational change ”. In Paradox and Transformation:Toward a Theory of Change in Organization and Management, Edited by:Quinn, R. E., and Cameron, K. S., 19–63. Cambridge, MA:Ballinger.
51. Van de Ven, A. H., and Poole, M. S., 2002. “ Field research methods ”. In Companion to Organizations, Edited by:Baum, J. A. C., Oxford:Blackwell.
52. Weick, K. E., 1989. Theory construction as disciplined imagination. Academy of Management Review, 14 (4):516–531.
53. Weick, K. E., 1992. Agenda setting in organizational behavior:a theory-focused approach. Journal of Management Inquiry, 1 (3):171–182.
54. Weick, K. E., 1995. What theory is not, theorizing is. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40:385–390.
55. Weick, K. E., 2001. Gapping the relevance bridge:fashions meet fundamentals in management research. British Journal of Management, 1 (12):571–577.
56. Weick, K. E., and Quinn, R. E., 1999. Organizational change and development. Annual Review of Psychology, 50:361–386.
57. Whetten, D. A., 1989. What constitutes a theoretical contribution?. Academy of Management Review, 14 (4):490–495.
58. Whetten, D. A., 2002. “ Modeling-as-theorizing:a methodology for theory development ”. In Essential Skills for Management Research, Edited by:Partington, D., Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
59. Yang, B., 2002. Meta-analysis research and theory building. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 4 (3):296–316.