Research on scaling up evidence-based instructional practice: Developing a sensitive measure of the rate of implementation

Educational Technology Research and Development

Volumn 54, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 467-492

  Buzhardt, Jay ^a   Greenwood, Charles R ^a   Abbott, Mary ^a   Tapia, Yolanda ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Large scale implementation; Rate of implementation; Research from a distance; Scaling up

Indexed keywords

EID: 33749564780     PISSN: 10421629     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11423-006-0129-5     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Abbott, M., Greenwood, C., Buzhardt, J., Tapia, Y. (2006). Using technology-based teacher support tools to scale up the classwide peer tutoring program. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 22(1), 47-64.
2. Abbott, M., Buzhardt, J., & Greenwood, C. R. (2003). Scaling up classwide peer tutoring: Effects of a blueprint on use, implementation, and student learning. Paper presented at the Pacific Coast Research Conference, LaJolla, CA.
3. Berends, M., Kirby, S., Naftal, S., & McKelvey, C. (2001). Implementation and performance in new American schools: Three years into scale-up. Arlington, VA: Rand Education.
4. Carnine, D. (1997). Bridging the research-to-practice gap. Exceptional Children, 63(4), 513-521.
5. Clark, R. E. (1989). Current progress and future directions for research in instructional technology. Educational Technology Research and Development, 37(1), 57-66.
6. Department of Education. (2003). Identifying and implementing educational practices supported by rigorous evidence. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved February 27, 2005 from http://www.excelgov.org/usermedia/images/uploads/PDFs/ User-Friendly_Guide_12.2.03.pdf.
7. Department of Education. (2004). Proven methods: Questions and answers on No Child Left Behind. Retrieved November 3, 2004 from http://www.ed.gov/nclb/ methods/whatworks/doing.html
8. Elmore, R. F. (1996). Getting to scale with good educational practice. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 1-26.
9. Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. (1998). Researchers and teachers working together to adapt instruction for diverse learners. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 13(3), 162-170.
10. Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1986). Linking assessment to instructional intervention: An overview. School Psychology Review, 15, 318-323.
11. Fullan, M. (2001). The new meaning of educational change (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
12. Greenwood, C. R. (1991). Longitudinal analysis of time engagement and academic achievement in at-risk and non-risk students. Exceptional Children, 57, 521-535.
13. Greenwood, C. R. (1997). Classwide peer tutoring. Behavior and Social Issues, 7, 11-18.
14. Greenwood, C. R., & Abbott, M. (2001). The research to practice gap in special education. Teacher Education and Special Education, 24(4), 276-289.
15. Greenwood, C. R., Arreaga-Mayer, C., Utley, C. A., Gavin, K., & Terry, B. J. (2001). Classwide peer tutoring learning management system: Applications with elementary-level English language learners. Remedial and Special Education, 22(1), 34-47.
16. Greenwood, C. R., & Delquadri, J. (1995). Classwide peer tutoring and the prevention of school failure. Preventing School Failure, 39(4), 21-25.
17. Greenwood, C. R., & Hou, S. (2001). The classwide peer tutoring learning management system (CWPT-LMS): Manual for teachers. Kansas City, KS: Juniper Gardens Children's Project, University of Kansas.
18. Greenwood, C. R., Hou, L. S., Delquadri, J., Terry, B. J., & Arreaga-Mayer, C. (2001). Classwide peer tutoring program: A learning management system. In J. Woodward & L. Cuban (Eds.), Technology, curriculum, and professional development: Adapting schools to meet the needs of students with disabilities (pp. 61-86). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
19. Greenwood, C. R., Maheady, L., & Delquadri, J. (2002). Classwide peer tutoring. In M. R. Shinn, H. M. Walker & G. Stoner (Eds.), Interventions for achievement and behavior problems (2nd ed., pp. 611-649). Washington, DC: National Association for School Psychologists (NASP).
20. Greenwood, C. R., Terry, B., Utley, C. A., Montagna, D., & Walker, D. (1993). Achievement placement and services: Middle school benefits of classwide peer tutoring used at the elementary school. School Psychology Review, 22(3), 497-516.
21. Institute of Educational Sciences. (2004). Reading comprehension and reading scale-up research CFDA 84.305G. Washington, DC: Department of Education.
22. King-Sears, M. (2001). Institutionalizing peer-mediated instruction and interventions in schools, Remedial and Special Education, 2(22) 89-101.
23. Klingner, J. K., Ahwee, S., Pilonieta, P., & Menendez, R. (2003). Barriers and facilitators in scaling up research-based practice. Exceptional Children, 69(4), 411-429.
24. Kozma, R. (2000). Reflections on the state of educational technology research and development. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(1), 5-15.
25. Mayben, R., Nichols, S., Wright, V. (2003). Distance technologies in collaborative research: Analyzing the successes and barriers. The Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 2(2), 1-21.
26. Pauleen, D., & Yoong, P. (2001). Facilitating virtual team relationships via Internet and conventional communication channels. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policies, 11(3), 190-202.
27. Rogers, E. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: The Free Press.
28. Schorr, L. B. (1988). Common purpose: Strengthening families and neighborhoods to rebuild America. New York: Anchor.
29. Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
30. Utley, C. A., Mortweet, S. L., & Greenwood, C. R. (1997). Peer-mediated instruction and interventions. Focus on Exceptional Children, 29(5), 1-23.