A multisite study to examine the efficacy of the otoacoustic emission/automated auditory brainstem response newborn hearing screening protocol: Recommendations for policy, practice, and research

American Journal of Audiology

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2005, Pages

  Gravel, Judith S ^a,l   White, Karl R ^b   Johnson, Jean L ^c   Widen, Judith E ^d   Vohr, Betty R ^e   James, Michele ^f   Kennalley, Teresa ^g   Maxon, Antonia B ^h   Spivak, Lynn ⁱ   Sullivan Mahoney, Maureen ^j   Weirather, Yusnita ^k   Meyer, Sally ^b  

^a ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e WOMEN AND INFANTS HOSPITAL   (United States)

^f ARNOLD PALMER HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN   (United States)

^g Christi Regional Medical Center   (United States)

^h New England Center for Hearing Rehabilitation   (United States)

ⁱ LONG ISLAND JEWISH MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^j GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL   (United States)

^k KAPIOLANI MEDICAL CENTER FOR WOMEN AND CHILDREN   (United States)

^l CHILDREN S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

Automated auditory brainstem response; Newborn hearing screening; Otoacoustic emissions; Visual reinforcement audiometry

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CLINICAL RESEARCH; EVOKED BRAIN STEM AUDITORY RESPONSE; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH PROGRAM; HEARING ACUITY; HEARING AID; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; REVIEW; SCREENING TEST;

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; EARLY INTERVENTION (EDUCATION); EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY, BRAIN STEM; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEARING LOSS; HUMANS; INFANT; INFANT, NEWBORN; MALE; NEONATAL SCREENING; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PREVALENCE; REHABILITATION OF HEARING IMPAIRED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33749253041     PISSN: 10590889     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1044/1059-0889(2005/023)     Document Type: Review

References (63)

1. Allen, R. L., Stuart, A., Everett, D., & Elangovan, S. (2004). Preschool hearing screening: Pass/refer rates for children enrolled in a head start program in eastern North Carolina. American Journal of Audiology, 13, 29-38.
2. American Academy of Pediatrics. (2002). The medical home [Policy statement]. Pediatrics, 110, 184-186.
3. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2004). Guidelines for the audiologic assessment of children from birth to 5 years of age. Available from http://www.asha.org/members/deskref-journals/deskref/default
4. Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling for the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 57(1), 289-300.
5. Bess, F. H., Dodd-Murphy, J., & Parker, R. A. (1998). Children with minimal sensorineural hearing loss: Prevalence, educational performance, and functional status. Ear and Hearing, 19, 339-354.
6. Bess, F. H., & Paradise, J. (1994). Universal screening for infant hearing impairment: Not simple, not risk-free, not necessarily beneficial, and not presently justified. Pediatrics, 93, 330-334.
7. Bess, F. H., & Tharpe, A. M. (1984). Unilateral hearing impairment in children. Pediatrics, 74, 206-216.
8. Chang, K. W., Vohr, B. R., Norton, S. J., & Lekas, M. D. (1993). External and middle ear status related to evoked otoacoustic emissions in neonates. Archives of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, 119, 276-282.
9. Cone-Wesson, B., Vohr, B. R., Sininger, Y. S., Widen, J. E., Folsom, R. C., Gorga, M. P., & Norton, S. J. (2000). Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: Infants with hearing loss. Ear and Hearing, 21, 488-507.
10. Dalzell, L., Orlando, M., MacDonald, M., Berg, A., Bradley, M., Cacace, A., et al. (2000). The New York State universal newborn hearing screening demonstration project: Ages of hearing loss identification, hearing aid fitting, and enrollment in early intervention. Ear and Hearing, 21, 118-130.
11. Davis, A., Reeve, K., Hind, S., & Bamford, J. (2002). Children with mild and unilateral hearing impairment. In R. C. Seewald & J. S. Gravel (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference: A sound foundation through early amplification (pp. 179-186). London: St. Edmundsbury Press.
12. Doyle, K. J., Burggraaff, B., Fujikawa, S., & Kim, J. (1997). Neonatal hearing screening by otoacoustic emissions and automated auditory brainstem response. International Journal of Pediatric Otolaryngology, 41(2), 111-119.
13. Doyle, K. J., Burggraaff, B., Fujikawa, S., Kim, J., & MacArthur, C. J. (1997). Neonatal hearing screening with otoscopy, auditory brainstem response, and otoacoustic emissions. Archives of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, 116, 597-603.
14. Finitzo, T., Albright, K., & O'Neal, J. (1998). The newborn with hearing loss: Detection in the nursery. Pediatrics, 102, 1452-1460.
15. Gorga, M. P., & Neely, S. T. (2003). Cost-effectiveness and test-performance factors in relation to universal newborn hearing screening. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 9, 103-108.
16. Gorga, M. P., Neely, S. T., Ohlrich, B., Hoover, B., Redner, J., & Peters, J. (1997). From laboratory to clinic: A large scale study of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in ears with normal hearing and ears with hearing loss. Ear and Hearing, 18, 440-455.
17. Gorga, M. P., Norton, S. J., Sininger, Y. S., Cone-Wesson, B., Folsom, R. C., Vohr, B. R., et al. (2000). Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: Distortion product otoacoustic emissions during the perinatal period. Ear and Hearing, 21, 400-424.
18. Gorga, M. P., Preissler, K., Simmons, J., Walker, L., & Hoover, B. (2001). Some issues relevant to establishing a universal newborn hearing screening program. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 12, 101-112.
19. Gravel, J. S. (2005). Evidence-based pediatric audiology. In R. C. Seewald & J. M. Bamford (Eds.), A sound foundation through early amplification 2004: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference (pp. 17-26). London: Immediate Proceedings.
20. Gravel, J., Berg, A., Bradley, M., Cacace, A., Campbell, D., Dalzell, L., et al. (2000). New York State universal newborn hearing screening demonstration project: Effects of screening protocol on inpatient outcome measures. Ear and Hearing, 21, 131-140.
21. Hall, A. J. (2005). Otoacoustic emissions and hearing threshold level. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Southampton, England.
22. Hall, A. J., & Lutman, M. E. (1999). Methods for early identification of noise-induced hearing loss. Audiology, 38, 277-280.
23. Harrison, M., & Roush, J. (1996). Age of suspicion, identification, and intervention for infants and young children with hearing loss: A national study. Ear and Hearing, 17, 55-62.
24. Harrison, M., Roush, J., & Wallace, J. (2003). Trends in age of identification and intervention in young children with hearing loss. Ear and Hearing, 24, 89-95.
25. Headley, G. M., Campbell, D. E., & Gravel, J. S. (2000). Effect of neonatal test environment on recording transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Pediatrics, 105, 1279-1285.
26. Hicks, C. B., & Tharpe, A. M. (2002). Listening effort and fatigue in school-age children with and without hearing loss. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 45, 573-584.
27. Johnson, J. L., White, K. R., Widen, J. E., Gravel, J. S., James, M., Kennalley, T., et al. (2005). A multi-center evaluation of how many infants with permanent hearing loss pass a two-stage otoacoustic emissions/automated auditory brainstem response newborn hearing screening protocol. Pediatrics, 116, 663-672.
28. Johnson, J. L., White, K. R., Widen, J. E., Gravel, J. S., Vohr, B. R., James, M., et al. (2005). A multisite study to examine the efficacy of the otoacoustic emission/automated auditory brainstem response newborn hearing screening protocol: Introduction and overview of the study. American Journal of Audiology, 14, S178-S185.
29. Joint Committee on Infant Hearing. (2000). Year 2000 position statement: Principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs. American Journal of Audiology, 9, 9-29.
30. Keefe, D. H., Folsom, R. C., Gorga, M. P., Vohr, B. R., Bulen, J. C., & Norton, S. J. (2000). Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: Ear-canal measurements of acoustic admittance and reflectance in neonates. Ear and Hearing, 21, 443-161.
31. Keefe, D. H., Gorga, M. P., Neely, S. T., Zhao, F., & Vohr, B. R. (2003). Ear-canal acoustic admittance and reflectance measurements in human neonates. II. Predictions of middle-ear in dysfunction and sensorineural hearing loss. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113, 407-422.
32. Keefe, D. H., Zhao, F., Neely, S. T., Gorga, M. P., & Vohr, B. R. (2003). Ear-canal acoustic admittance and reflectance effects in human neonates. I. Predictions of otoacoustic emission and auditory brainstem responses. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113, 389-406.
33. Kei, J., Allison-Levick, J., Dockray, J., Harrys, R., Kirkegard, C., Wong, J., et al. (2003). High-frequency (1000 Hz) tympanometry in normal neonates. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 14, 20-28.
34. Lieu, J. E. (2004). Speech-language and educational consequences of unilateral hearing loss in children. Archives of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, 130, 524-530.
35. Margolis, R. H., Bass-Ringdahl, S., Hanks, W. D., Holte, L., & Zapala, D. A. (2003). Tympanometry in newborn infants-1 kHz norms. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 14, 383-392.
36. Moeller, M. P. (2000). Early intervention and language development in children who are deaf and hard of hearing. Pediatrics, 106(3), e43.
37. National Center for Hearing Assessment and Management. (2005). Universal newborn hearing screening: Summary statistics of UNHS in the United States for 2005. Retrieved April 15, 2005, from www.infanthearing.org/status/unhsstate.html
38. National Institutes of Health. (1993, March). Early identification of hearing impairment in infants and young children. NIH Consensus Statement, 11(1), 1-24. Available from http://consensus.nih.gov/cons/092/092_intro.htm
39. Norton, S. J., Gorga, M. P., Widen, J. E., Folsom, R. C., Sininger, Y., Cone-Wesson, B., et al. (2000a). Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: Evaluation of transient evoked otoacoustic emission, distortion product otoacoustic emission, and auditory brain stem response test performance. Ear and Hearing, 21, 508-528.
40. Norton, S. J., Gorga, M. P., Widen, J. E., Folsom, R. C., Sininger, Y., Cone-Wesson, B., et al. (2000b). Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: Summary and recommendations. Ear and Hearing, 21, 529-535.
41. Prieve, B., Dalzell, L., Berg, A., Bradley, M., Cacace, A., Campbell, D., et al. (2000). The New York State universal newborn hearing screening demonstration project: Outpatient outcome measures. Ear and Hearing, 21, 104-117.
42. Prieve, B. A., & Stevens, F. (2000). The New York State universal newborn hearing screening demonstration project: Introduction and overview. Ear and Hearing, 21, 85-91.
43. Ross, D. S., Visser, S., Holstrum, J., & Kenneson, A. (2005, March). Minimal hearing loss and cognitive performance in children (preliminary results). Paper presented at the U.K. Screening Conference, London.
44. Seewald, R. C., & Scollie, S. D. (1999). Infants are not average adults: Implications for audiometric testing. Hearing Journal, 52(10), 64-72.
45. Sharma, A., Dorman, M. F., & Kral, A. (2005). The influence of a sensitive period on central auditory development in children with unilateral and bilateral cochlear implants. Hearing Research, 203(1-2), 134-143.
46. Sininger, Y. S., Abdala, C., & Cone-Wesson, B. (1997). Auditory threshold sensitivity of the human neonate as measured by the auditory brainstem response. Hearing Research, 104, 27-38.
47. Sininger, Y. S., Cone-Wesson, B., Folsom, R. C., Gorga, M. P., Vohr, B. R., Widen, J. E., et al. (2000). Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: Auditory brain stem responses in the perinatal period. Ear and Hearing, 21, 383-399.
48. Spivak, L., Dalzell, L., Berg, A., Bradley, M., Cacace, A., Campbell, D., et al. (2000). New York State universal newborn hearing screening demonstration project: Inpatient outcome measures. Ear and Hearing, 21, 92-103.
49. Stapells, D. R. (2000). Threshold estimation by the tone-evoked ABR: A literature meta-analysis. Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, 24(2), 74-83.
50. Stapells, D. R., Picton, T. W., & Smith, A. D. (1982). Normal hearing thresholds for clicks. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 72, 74-79.
51. Stevens, J., & Wood, S. (2004, May). NHSP in England: Screening equipment. Paper presented at the International Newborn Hearing Screening Symposium, Como, Italy.
52. Stredler-Brown, A. (2004, December). Mild and unilateral hearing loss: Intervention. Invited presentation at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
53. Sutton, G. J., Gleadle, P., & Rowe, S. J. (1996). Tympanometry and otoacoustic emissions in a cohort of special care neonates. British Journal of Audiology, 30, 9-17.
54. Thornton, A. R. D., Kimm, L., Kennedy, C. R., & Cafarelli-Dees, D. (1993). External- and middle-ear factors affecting evoked otoacoustic emissions in neonates. British Journal of Audiology, 27, 319-327.
55. Vohr, B. R., Carty, L. M., Moore, P. E., & Letourneau, K. (1998). The Rhode Island Assessment Program: Experience with statewide hearing screening (1993-1996). Journal of Pediatrics, 133, 353-357.
56. White, K. (2003). The current status of EHDI programs in the United States. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 9, 79-88.
57. White, K. R., Vohr, B. R., Meyer, S., Widen, J. E., Johnson J. L., Gravel, J. S., et al. (2005). A multisite study to examine the efficacy of the otoacoustic emission/automated auditory brainstem response newborn hearing screening protocol: Research design and results of the study. American Journal of Audiology, 14, S186-S199.
58. Widen, J. E. (1993). Adding objectivity to infant behavioral audiometry. Ear and Hearing, 14, 49-57.
59. Widen, J. E., Folsom, R. C., Cone-Wesson, B., Carty, L., Dunnell, J. J., Koebsell, K., et al. (2000). Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: Hearing status at 8 to 12 months corrected age using a visual reinforcement audiometry protocol. Ear and Hearing, 21, 471-487.
60. Widen, J. E., Johnson, J. L., White, K. R., Gravel, J. S., Vohr B. R., James, M., et al. (2005). A multisite study to examine the efficacy of the otoacoustic emission/automated auditory brainstem response newborn hearing screening protocol: Results of visual reinforcement audiometry. American Journal of Audiology, 14, S200-S216.
61. Widen, J. E., & O'Grady, G. M. (2002). Otoacoustic emissions in the evaluation of children. In M. Robinette & T. Glattke (Eds.), Otoacoustic emissions (2nd ed., pp. 375-415). New York: Thieme.
62. Yoshinaga-Itano, C., Sedey, A. L., Coulter, D. K., & Mehl, A. L. (1998). Language of early- and later-identified children with hearing loss. Pediatrics, 102, 1161-1171.
63. Zhang, J.-H., Chung, T. D. Y., & Oldenburg, K. R. (2000). Confirmation of primary active substances from high throughput screening of chemical and biological populations: A statistical approach and practical considerations. Journal of Combinatorial Chemistry, 2, 258-265.