A multisite study to examine the efficacy of the otoacoustic emission/automated auditory brainstem response newborn hearing screening protocol: Results of visual reinforcement audiometry

American Journal of Audiology

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2005, Pages

  Widen, Judith E ^a   Johnson, Jean L ^b,l   White, Karl R ^c   Gravel, Judith S ^d   Vohr, Betty R ^e   James, Michele ^f   Kennalley, Teresa ^g   Maxon, Antonia B ^h   Spivak, Lynn ⁱ   Sullivan Mahoney, Maureen ^j   Weirather, Yusnita ^k   Meyer, Sally ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

^c UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e WOMEN AND INFANTS HOSPITAL   (United States)

^f ARNOLD PALMER HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN   (United States)

^g Christi Regional Medical Center   (United States)

^h New England Center for Hearing Rehabilitation   (United States)

ⁱ LONG ISLAND JEWISH MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^j GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL   (United States)

^k KAPIOLANI MEDICAL CENTER FOR WOMEN AND CHILDREN   (United States)

^l CHILDREN S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

Automated brainstem response audiometry; Otoacoustic emissions; Tympanometry; Visual reinforcement audiometry

Indexed keywords

AUDIOGRAPHY; AUDIOLOGY; AUDIOMETRY; CLINICAL RESEARCH; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED BRAIN STEM AUDITORY RESPONSE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH PROGRAM; HEARING ACUITY; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; INFANT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; REVIEW; SCREENING TEST; TYMPANOMETRY;

ACOUSTIC IMPEDANCE TESTS; ATTENTION; AUDIOMETRY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY, BRAIN STEM; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEARING LOSS; HUMANS; INFANT; INFANT, NEWBORN; MALE; NEONATAL SCREENING; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PREVALENCE; REINFORCEMENT (PSYCHOLOGY); REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33751210079     PISSN: 10590889     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1044/1059-0889(2005/022)     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. American National Standards Institute. (1996). Specification for audiometers (ANSI S3.6-1996). New York: Author.
2. Day, J., Bamford, J., Parry, G., Shepherd, M., & Quigley, A. (2000). Evidence on the efficacy of insert earphone and sound field VRA with young infants. British Journal of Audiology, 34, 329-334.
3. Gravel, J., Berg, A., Bradley, M., Cacace, A., Campbell, D., Dalzell, L., et al. (2000). New York State Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Demonstration Project: Effects of screening protocol on inpatient outcome measures. Ear and Hearing, 21, 131-140.
4. Gravel, J. S., & Wallace, I. F. (2000). Effects of otitis media with effusion on hearing in the first 3 years of life. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43, 631-644.
5. Gravel, J. S., White, K.R., Johnson, J. L., Widen, J. E., Vohr, B. R., James, M., et al. (2005). A multisite study to examine the efficacy of the otoacoustic emission/automated auditory brainstem response protocol: Recommendations for policy, practice, and research. American Journal of Audiology, 14, S217-S228.
6. Johnson, J. L., White, K. R., Widen, J. E., Gravel, J. S., James, M., Kennalley, T., et al. (2005). A multicenter evaluation of how many infants with permanent hearing loss pass a two-stage otoacoustic emissions/automated auditory brainstem response newborn hearing screening protocol. Pediatrics, 116, 663-672.
7. Johnson, J. L., White, K. R., Widen, J. E., Gravel, J. S., Vohr, B. R., James, M., et al. (2005). A multisite study to examine the efficacy of the otoacoustic emission/automated auditory brainstem response newborn hearing screening protocol: Introduction and overview of the study. American Journal of Audiology, 14, S178-S185.
8. Joint Committee on Infant Hearing. (1994). Joint Committee on Infant Hearing 1994 position statement. Pediatrics, 94, 152-156.
9. Lutman, M. E., Davis, A. C., Fortnum, H. M., & Wood, S. (1997). Field sensitivity of targeted neonatal hearing screening by transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Ear and Hearing, 18, 265-276.
10. Mason, S., Davis, A., Wood, S., & Farnsworth, A. (1998). Field sensitivity of targeted neonatal hearing screening using the Nottingham ABR screener. Ear and Hearing, 19, 91-102.
11. Norton, S., Gorga, M., Widen, J., Folsom, R., Sininger, Y., Cone-Wesson, B., et al. (2000). Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: Evaluation of transient evoked otoacoustic emission, distortion product otoacoustic emission, and auditory brain stem response test performance. Ear and Hearing, 21, 508-528.
12. Nozza, R. J., Bluestone, C. D., Kardatzke, D., & Bachman, R. (1994). Identification of middle ear effusion by aural acoustic admittance and otoscopy. Ear and Hearing, 15, 310-323.
13. Roush, J., Bryant, K., Mundy, M., Zeisel, S., & Roberts, J. (1995). Developmental changes in static admittance and tympanometric width in infants and toddlers. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 6, 334-338.
14. Sabo, D. L., Paradise, J. L., Kurs-Lasky, M., & Smith, C. G. (2003). Hearing levels in infants and young children in relation to testing technique, age group, and the presence or absence of middle-ear effusion. Ear and Hearing, 24, 38-47.
15. Shannon, D. A., Felix, J. K., Krumholz, A., Goldstein, P. J., & Harris, K. C. (1984). Hearing screening of high risk newborns with brainstem auditory evoked potentials: A follow-up study. Pediatrics, 73, 22-26.
16. Swigonski, N., Shallop, J., Bull, M. J., & Lemons, J. A. (1987). Hearing screening of high risk newborns. Ear and Hearing, 8, 26-30.
17. Talbott, C. B. (1987). A longitudinal study comparing responses of hearing-impaired infants to pure tones using visual reinforcement and play audiometry. Ear and Hearing, 8, 175-179.
18. van Straaten, H. L. M., Groote, M. E., & Oudesluys-Murphy, A. M. (1996). Evaluation of an automated auditory brainstem response infant hearing screening method in at risk neonates. European Journal of Pediatrics, 155, 702-705.
19. Vohr, B. R., Oh, W., Steward, E. J., Bentkover, J. D., Gabbard, S., Lemons, J., et al. (2001). Comparison of costs and referral rates of 3 universal newborn hearing screening protocols. Pediatrics, 139, 238-244.
20. Watson, D. R., McClelland, R. J., & Adams, D. A. (1996). Auditory brainstem response screening for hearing loss in high risk neonates. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinogology, 36, 147-183.
21. White, K. R., Vohr, B. R., Meyer, S., Widen, J. E., Johnson, J. L., Gravel, J. S., et al. (2005). A multisite study to examine the efficacy of the otoacoustic emission/automated auditory brainstem response newborn hearing screening protocol: Research design and results of the study. American Journal of Audiology, 14, S186-S199.
22. Widen, J., Folsom, R., Cone-Wesson, B., Carty, L., Dunnell, J., Koebsell, K., et al. (2000). Hearing status at 8 to 12 months corrected age using a visual reinforcement audiometry protocol. Ear and Hearing, 21, 471-487.
23. Wilson, W. R., & Thompson, G. (1984). Behavioral audiometry. In J. Jerger (Ed.), Pediatric audiology. San Diego, CA: College Hill Press.