A multisite study to examine the efficacy of the otoacoustic emission/automated auditory brainstem response newborn hearing screening protocol: Research design and results of the study

American Journal of Audiology

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2005, Pages

  White, Karl R ^a   Vohr, Betty R ^b   Meyer, Sally ^a   Widen, Judith E ^c   Johnson, Jean L ^d   Gravel, Judith S ^e,l   James, Michele ^f   Kennalley, Teresa ^g   Maxon, Antonia B ^h   Spivak, Lynn ⁱ   Sullivan Mahoney, Maureen ^j   Weirather, Yusnita ^k  

^a UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b WOMEN AND INFANTS HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

^e ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^f ARNOLD PALMER HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN   (United States)

^g Christi Regional Medical Center   (United States)

^h New England Center for Hearing Rehabilitation   (United States)

ⁱ LONG ISLAND JEWISH MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^j GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL   (United States)

^k KAPIOLANI MEDICAL CENTER FOR WOMEN AND CHILDREN   (United States)

^l CHILDREN S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

Automated auditory brainstem response; Congenital hearing loss; False negatives; Newborn hearing screening; Otoacoustic emissions

Indexed keywords

AUDITORY SCREENING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; EVOKED BRAIN STEM AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; INFANT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; NEWBORN SCREENING; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; REVIEW;

EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY, BRAIN STEM; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEARING LOSS; HUMANS; INFANT; INFANT, NEWBORN; MALE; NEONATAL SCREENING; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS; PREVALENCE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESEARCH DESIGN; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33746659271     PISSN: 10590889     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1044/1059-0889(2005/021)     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2005). DSHPSHWA data summary for reporting year 2003. Retrieved April 15, 2005, from http://www.cdc.gov/ ncbddd/ehdi/2003/Data_Summary_03D.pdf
2. Clemens, C. J., & Davis, S. A. (2001). Minimizing false-positives in universal newborn hearing screening: A simple solution. Pediatrics, 107(3), e29.
3. Cone-Wesson, B., Vohr, B. R., Sininger, Y. S., Widen, J. E., Folsom, R. C., Gorga, M. P., & Norton, S. J. (2000). Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: Infants with hearing loss. Ear and Hearing, 21, 488-507.
4. Finitzo, T. (2000). Experiences of a long-established universal newborn hearing screening program. The Hearing Journal, 53(11), 48-53.
5. Foust, T., Winston, R. L., Eiserman, W., Buhrmann, J., & Shisler, L. (2005, March). Childhood hearing outreach: The Hearing Head Start ECHO Project. Paper presented at the 2005 National EHDI Meeting, Atlanta, GA. Retrieved September 9, 2005, from www.infanthearing.org/meeting/ehdi2005/presentations. html
6. Gravel, J. S., White, K. R., Johnson, J. L., Widen, J. E., Vohr, B. R., James, M., et al. (2005). A multisite study to examine the efficacy of the otoacoustic emission/automated auditory brainstem response protocol: Recommendations for policy, practice, and research. American Journal of Audiology, 14, S217-S228.
7. Isaacson, G. (2000). Universal newborn hearing screening in an inner-city managed care environment. The Laryngoscope, 110, 881-894.
8. Johnson, J. L., White, K. R., Widen, J. E., Gravel, J. S., James, M., Kennalley, T., et al. (2005). A multi-center evaluation of how many infants with permanent hearing loss pass a two-stage otoacoustic emissions/automated auditory brainstem response newborn hearing screening protocol. Pediatrics, 116, 663-672.
9. Johnson, J. L., White, K. R., Widen, J. E., Gravel, J. S., Vohr, B. R., James, M., et al. (2005). A multisite study to examine the efficacy of the otoacoustic emission/automated auditory brainstem response newborn hearing screening protocol: Introduction and overview of the study. American Journal of Audiology, 14, S178-S185.
10. Joint Committee on Infant Hearing. (2000). Year 2000 position statement: Principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs. American Journal of Audiology, 9, 9-29.
11. Leonard, D. R., Shen, T., Howe, H. L., & Egler, T. (Eds.). (1999). Trends in the prevalence of birth defects in Illinois and Chicago 1989 to 1997 (Epidemiologic Report Series 99:4). Springfield: Illinois Department of Public Health.
12. Lutman, M. E., Davis, A. C., Fortnum, H. M., & Wood, S. (1997). Field sensitivity of targeted neonatal hearing screening by transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Ear and Hearing, 18, 265-276.
13. Mason, S., Davis, A., Wood, S., & Farnsworth, A. (1998). Field sensitivity of targeted neonatal hearing screening using the Nottingham ABR screener. Ear and Hearing, 19, 91-102.
14. National Center for Hearing Assessment and Management. (2005). Universal newborn hearing screening: Summary statistics of UNHS in the United States for 2005. Retrieved April 15, 2005, from http://www.infanthearing.org/status/ unhsstate.html
15. Prieve, B. A. (2000). Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: A cornerstone for infant hearing screening. Ear and Hearing, 21, 345.
16. Stierman, L. (1994). Birth defects in California: 1983-1990. Sacramento: California Department of Health Services, The California Birth Defects Monitoring Program.
17. White, K. R. (1997, October). Universal newborn hearing screening: Issues and evidence. Paper presented to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA. Retrieved April 15, 2005, from http://www. infanthearing.org/summary/prevalence.html
18. White, K. R. (2003). The current status of EHDI programs in the United States. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 9, 79-88.
19. Widen, J. E., Folsom, R. C., Cone-Wesson, B., Carty, L., Dunnell, J. J., Koebsell, K., et al. (2000). Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: Hearing status at 8 to 12 months corrected age using a visual reinforcement audiometry protocol. Ear and Hearing, 21, 471-487.
20. Widen, J. E., Johnson, J. L., White, K. R., Gravel, J. S., Vohr, B. R., James, M., et al. (2005). A multisite study to examine the efficacy of the otoacoustic emission/automated auditory brainstem response newborn hearing screening protocol: Results of visual reinforcement audiometry. American Journal of Audiology, 14, S200-S216.
21. Winston, R. L., Eiserman, R. L., & Shisler, W. (2005, March). Effective hearing screening practices in health care settings-Childhood hearing outreach: The Hearing Head Start ECHO Project. Paper presented at 2005 National EHDI Meeting, Atlanta, GA. Retrieved September 9, 2005, from www.infanthearing.org/meeting/ehdi2005/presentations.html