A multisite study to examine the efficacy of the otoacoustic emission/automated auditory brainstem response newborn hearing screening protocol: Introduction and overview of the study

American Journal of Audiology

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2005, Pages

  Johnson, Jean L ^a   White, Karl R ^b   Widen, Judith E ^c   Gravel, Judith S ^d,l   Vohr, Betty R ^e   James, Michele ^f   Kennalley, Teresa ^g   Maxon, Antonia B ^h   Spivak, Lynn ⁱ   Sullivan Mahoney, Maureen ^j   Weirather, Yusnita ^k   Meyer, Sally ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

^b UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e WOMEN AND INFANTS HOSPITAL   (United States)

^f ARNOLD PALMER HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN   (United States)

^g Christi Regional Medical Center   (United States)

^h New England Center for Hearing Rehabilitation   (United States)

ⁱ LONG ISLAND JEWISH MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^j GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL   (United States)

^k KAPIOLANI MEDICAL CENTER FOR WOMEN AND CHILDREN   (United States)

^l CHILDREN S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

Automated auditory brainstem response; Otoacoustic emissions; Universal newborn hearing screening; Visual reinforcement audiometry

Indexed keywords

AUDITORY SCREENING; BEHAVIOR; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; EVOKED BRAIN STEM AUDITORY RESPONSE; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; INFANT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METHODOLOGY; NEWBORN; NEWBORN SCREENING; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; REVIEW;

EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY, BRAIN STEM; HEARING LOSS; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; NEONATAL SCREENING; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33749244187     PISSN: 10590889     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1044/1059-0889(2005/020)     Document Type: Review

References (29)

1. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2004). Guidelines for the audiologic assessment of children from birth to 5 years of age. Available from http://www.asha.org/members/deskref-journals/deskref/default.
2. Association of Teachers of Preventive Medicine. (2000). Request for application under ASPH/ATPM cooperative agreements. Washington, DC: Author.
3. Barsky-Firkser, L., & Sun, S. (1997). Universal newborn hearing screenings: A three-year experience. Pediatrics, 99(6), e4.
4. Bess, F. H., Dodd-Murphy, J., & Parker, R. A. (1998). Children with minimal sensorineural hearing loss: Prevalence, educational performance, and functional status. Ear and Hearing, 19, 339-354.
5. Commission on Education of the Deaf. (1988). Toward equality: Education of the deaf. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
6. Finitzo, T., Albright, K., & O'Neal, J. (1998). The newborn with hearing loss: Detection in the nursery. Pediatrics, 102, 1452-1460.
7. Herer, G. (2003, April). Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Program. Paper presented at the meeting of the Council on Exceptional Children Conference, Seattle, WA.
8. Johnson, J. (1997, October). Hawaii's experience in implementing universal newborn hearing screening. Paper presented to the CDC Workshop in Early Hearing Detection and Intervention, Atlanta, GA.
9. Johnson, J. L., Mauk, G. W., Takekawa, K. M., Simon, P. R., Sia, C. J., & Blackwell, P. M. (1993). Implementing a statewide system of services for infants and toddlers with hearing disabilities. Seminars in Hearing, 14, 105-118.
10. Johnson, J. L., White, K. R., Widen, J. E., Gravel, J. S., James, M., Kennalley, T., et al. (2005) A multicenter evaluation of how many infants with permanent hearing loss pass a two-stage otoacoustic emissions/automated auditory brainstem response newborn hearing screening protocol. Pediatrics, 116, 663-672.
11. Johnson, J., White, K., Widen, J., Weirather, Y., Gravel, J., Maxon, A., et al. (2004, May). Efficacy of OAE/ABR protocol in identifying hearing loss in newborns. Paper presented at the International Conference on Newborn Hearing Screening, Diagnosis, and Intervention, Cernobbio, Italy.
12. Joint Committee on Infant Hearing. (2000). Year 2000 position statement: Principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs. American Journal of Audiology, 9, 9-29.
13. Kemp, D. T., & Ryan, S. (1991). Otoacoustic emission tests in neonatal screening programmes. Acta Otolaryngologica Supplementum, 482, 73-84.
14. Mauk, G. W., & Behrens, T. R. (1993). Historical, political and technological context associated with early identification of hearing loss. Seminars in Hearing, 14, 1-17.
15. Mehl, A. L., & Thomson, V. (1998). Newborn hearing screening: The great omission. Pediatrics, 101(1), e4.
16. Mehl, A. L., & Thomson, V. (2002). The Colorado Newborn Hearing Screening Project, 1992-1999: On the threshold of effective population-based universal newborn hearing screening. Pediatrics, 109(1), e7.
17. National Center for Hearing Assessment and Management. (2005). Universal newborn hearing screening. Summary statistics of UNHS in the United States for 2005. Retrieved April 15, 2005, from http://www.infanthearing.org/status/ unhsstate.html
18. National Institutes of Health. (1993, March). Early identification of hearing impairment in infants and young children. NIH Consensus Statement, 11(1), 1-24.
19. Norton, S. J., Gorga, M. P., Widen, J. E., Folsom, R. C., Sininger, Y., Cone-Wesson, B., et al. (2000). Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: Evaluation of transient evoked otoacoustic emission, distortion product otoacoustic emission, and auditory brain stem response test performance. Ear and Hearing, 21, 508-528.
20. Prieve, B. A. (2000). Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: A cornerstone for infant hearing screening. Ear and Hearing, 21, 345.
21. Prieve, B. A., & Stevens, F. (2000). The New York State universal newborn hearing screening demonstration project: Introduction and overview. Ear and Hearing, 21, 104-117.
22. Spivak, L., Dalzell, L., Berg, A., Bradley, M., Cacace, A., Campbell, D., et al. (2000). The New York State universal newborn hearing screening demonstration project: Inpatient outcome measures. Ear and Hearing, 21, 92-103.
23. Stein, L. (1999). Factors influencing the efficacy of universal newborn hearing screening. Pediatric Clinics of North America, 46, 95-105.
24. Tharp, A. M. (2005, March). Mild hearing loss. Plenary presentation at the National Early Hearing, Detection and Intervention Conference, Atlanta, GA.
25. Vohr, B. R., Carty, L., Moore, P., & Letourneau, K. (1998). The Rhode Island hearing assessment program: Experience with statewide hearing screening (1993-1996). Journal of Pediatrics, 128, 710-714.
26. White, K. R. (2003). The current status of EHDI programs in the United States. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 9, 79-88.
27. White, K. R., Vohr, B. R., & Behrens, T. R. (1993). Universal newborn hearing screening using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions: Results of the Rhode Island hearing assessment project. Seminars in Hearing, 14, 18-29.
28. Widen, J. E., Folsom, R. C., Cone-Wesson, B., Carty, L., Dunnell, J. J., Koebsell, K., et al. (2000). Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: Hearing status at 8-12 months corrected age using a visual reinforcement audiometry protocol. Ear and Hearing, 21, 471-487.
29. Yoshinaga-Itano, C., Sedey, A., Coulter, D. K., & Mehl, A. L. (1998). Language of early and later identified children with hearing loss. Pediatrics, 102, 1161-1171.