Comparing view sensitivity in shape discrimination with shape sensitivity in view discrimination

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 68, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 655-673

  Lawson, Rebecca ^a   Bülthoff, Heinrich H ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; HUMAN; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; REACTION TIME; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VISION;

ATTENTION; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; REACTION TIME; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 33748867591     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03208766     Document Type: Review

References (36)

1. BIEDERMAN, I., & GERHARDSTEIN, P. C. (1993). Recognising depth-rotated objects: Evidence for 3-D viewpoint invariance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 1162-1182.
2. BIEDERMAN, I., & GERHARDSTEIN, P. C. (1995). Viewpoint-dependent mechanisms in visual object recognition: Reply to Tarr and Bülthoff (1995). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 1506-1514.
3. BÜLTHOFF, H. H., & EDELMAN, S. (1992). Psychophysical support for a 2-D view interpolation theory of object recognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 89, 60-64.
4. CUTZU, F., & EDELMAN, S. (1998). Representation of object similarity in human vision: Psychophysics and a computational model. Vision Research, 38, 2229-2257.
5. EDELMAN, S., & BÜLTHOFF, H. H. (1992). Orientation dependence in the recognition of three-dimensional objects. Vision Research, 32, 2385-2400.
6. FOSTER, D. H., & GILSON, S. J. (2002). Recognising novel three-dimensional objects by summing signals from parts and views. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: Series B, 269, 1939-1947.
7. GOLDSTONE, R. L. (1994). Influences of categorization on perceptual discrimination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 178-200.
8. GOLDSTONE, R. L., & STEYVERS, M. (2001). The sensitization and differentiation of dimensions during category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 116-139.
9. HAMM, J. P., & MCMULLEN, P. A. (1998). Effects of orientation on the identification of rotated objects depend on the level of identity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 413-426.
10. HAYWARD, W. G. (2003). After the viewpoint debate: Where next in object recognition? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 425-427.
11. HAYWARD, W. G., & WILLIAMS, P. (2000). Viewpoint dependence and object discriminability. Psychological Science, 11, 7-12.
12. HUMMEL, J. E., & STANKIEWICZ, B. J. (1998). Two roles for attention in shape perception: A structural description model of visual scrutiny. Visual Cognition, 5, 49-79.
13. HUMPHREY, G. K., & JOLICŒUR, P. (1993). An examination of the effects of axis foreshortening, monocular depth cues and visual field on object identification. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46A, 137-159.
14. JOLICŒUR, P. (1985). The time to name disoriented natural objects. Memory & Cognition, 13, 289-303.
15. JOLICŒUR, P. (1990). Identification of misoriented objects: A dual systems theory. Mind & Language, 5, 387-410.
16. JOLICŒUR, P., & HUMPHREY, G. K. (1998). Rotated objects and visual shapes. In V. Walsh & J. Kulikowski (Eds.), Perceptual constancy: Why things look as they do (pp. 69-123). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. LAWSON, R. (1999). Achieving visual object constancy over plane rotation and depth rotation. Acta Psychologica, 102, 221-245.
18. LAWSON, R. (2004a). Depth rotation and mirror-image reflection reduce affective preference as well as recognition memory for pictures of novel objects. Memory & Cognition, 32, 1170-1181.
19. LAWSON, R. (2004b). View sensitivity increases for same-shape matches if mismatches show pairs of more similar shapes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 896-902.
20. LAWSON, R., BÜLTHOFF, H. H., & DUMBELL, S. (2003). Interactions between view changes and shape changes in picture-picture matching. Perception, 32, 1465-1498.
21. LAWSON, R., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (1996). View-specificity in object processing: Evidence from picture matching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 395-416.
22. LAWSON, R., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (1998). View-specific effects of depth rotation and foreshortening on the initial recognition and priming of familiar objects. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 1052-1066.
23. LAWSON, R., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (1999). The effects of view in depth on the identification of line drawings and silhouettes of familiar objects: Normality and pathology. Visual Cognition, 6, 165-195.
24. LAWSON, R., & JOLICŒUR, P. (2003). Recognition thresholds for plane-rotated pictures of familiar objects. Acta Psychologica, 112, 17-41.
25. MARR, D. (1982). Vision. New York: Freeman.
26. OP DE BEECK, H., WAGEMANS, J., & VOGELS, R. (2003). The effect of category learning on the representation of shape can be biased but not differentiated. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 491-511.
27. PALMER, S., ROSCH, E., & CHASE, P. (1981). Canonical perspective and the perception of objects. In J. [B.] Long & A. [D.] Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance IX (pp. 135-151). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. PALMERI, T. J., & GAUTHIER, I. (2004). Visual object understanding. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 291-304.
29. POGGIO, T., & BIZZI, E. (2004). Generalisation in vision and motor control. Nature, 431, 768-774.
30. POGGIO, T., & EDELMAN, S. (1990). A network that learns to recognise three-dimensional objects. Nature, 343, 263-266.
31. SEAMON, J. G., & DELGADO, M. R. (1999). Recognition memory and affective preference for depth-rotated solid objects: Part-based structural descriptions may underlie the mere exposure effect. Visual Cognition, 6, 145-164.
32. STANKIEWICZ, B. J. (2002). Empirical evidence for independent dimensions in the visual representation of three-dimensional shape. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 913-932.
33. TARR, M. J., & BÜLTHOFF, H. H. (1995). Is human object recognition better described by geon-structural-descriptions or by multiple-views? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 1494-1505.
34. TARR, M. J., & CHENG, Y. D. (2003). Learning to see faces and objects. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17, 23-30.
35. TARR, M. J., & KRIEGMAN, D. J. (2001). What defines a view? Vision Research, 41, 1981-2004.
36. TARR, M. J., & PINKER, S. (1989). Mental rotation and orientation dependence in shape recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 233-283.