View sensitivity increases for same-shape matches if mismatches show pairs of more similar shapes

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 11, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 896-902

  Lawson, Rebecca ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; REACTION TIME; VISION;

DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; REACTION TIME; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 19644378719     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03196718     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. BIEDERMAN, I., & GERHARDSTEIN, P. C. (1993). Recognizing depth-rotated objects: Evidence for 3-D viewpoint invariance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 1162-1182.
2. BÜLTHOFF, H. H., & EDELMAN, S. (1992). Psychophysical support for a 2-D view interpolation theory of object recognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 89, 60-64.
3. EDELMAN, S. (1995). Class similarity and viewpoint invariance in the recognition of 3D objects. Biological Cybernetics, 72, 207-220.
4. FOSTER, D. H., & GILSON, S. J. (2002). Recognizing novel three-dimensional objects by summing signals from parts and views. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: Series B, 269, 1939-1947.
5. HAMM, J. P., & MCMULLEN, P. A. (1998). Effects of orientation on the identification of rotated objects depend on the level of identity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 413-426.
6. HAYWARD, W. G., & WILLIAMS, P. (2000). Viewpoint dependence and object discriminability. Psychological Science, 11, 7-12.
7. JOHNSON, S. H. (2001). Seeing two sides at once: Effects of viewpoint and object structure on recognizing three-dimensional objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 27, 1468-1484.
8. LAWSON, R. (1999). Achieving visual object constancy over plane rotation and depth rotation. Acta Psychologica, 102, 221-245.
9. LAWSON, R. (2003). The effects of context on learning to identify plane-misoriented views of familiar objects. Visual Cognition, 10, 795-821.
10. LAWSON, R., & BÜLTHOFF, H. H. (2004). Comparing view sensitivity in shape discrimination to shape sensitivity in view discrimination. Manuscript submitted for publication.
11. LAWSON, R., BÜLTHOFF, H. H., & DUMBELL, S. (2003). Interactions between view changes and shape changes in picture-picture matching. Perception, 32, 1465-1498.
12. LAWSON, R., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (1996). View-specificity in object processing: Evidence from picture matching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 395-416.
13. LAWSON, R., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (1998). View-specific effects of depth rotation and foreshortening on the initial recognition and priming of familiar objects. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 1052-1066.
14. LAWSON, R., HUMPHREYS, G. W., & JOLICŒUR, P. (2000). The combined effects of plane disorientation and foreshortening on picture naming -One manipulation or two? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 568-581.
15. LAWSON, R., & JOLICŒUR, P. (1998). The effects of plane rotation effects on the recognition of brief masked pictures of familiar objects. Memory & Cognition, 26, 791-803.
16. LAWSON, R., & JOLICŒUR, P. (2003). Recognition thresholds for plane-rotated pictures of familiar objects. Acta Psychologica, 112, 17-41.
17. MURRAY, J. E. (1998). Is entry-level recognition viewpoint invariant or viewpoint dependent? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 300-304.
18. NICHOLSON, K. G., & HUMPHREY, G. K. (2001). Surface cues reduce the latency to name rotated images of objects. Perception, 30, 1057-1081.
19. ROCK, I., & DIVITA, J. (1987). A case of viewer-centered object perception. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 280-293.
20. TARR, M. J., & CHENG, Y. D. (2003). Learning to see faces and objects. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 23-30.
21. VANRIE, J., BEATSE, E., WAGEMANS, J., SUNAERT, S., & VAN HECKE, P. (2002). Mental rotation versus invariant features in object perception from different viewpoints: An fMRI study. Neuropsychologia, 40, 917-930.
22. VANRIE, J., WILLEMS, B., & WAGEMANS, J. (2001). Multiple routes to object matching from different viewpoints: Mental rotation versus invariant features. Perception, 30, 1047-1056.