Phonological processing: Comments on Pierrehumbert, Moates et al., Kubozono, Peperkamp & Dupoux, and Bradlow

Laboratory Phonology 7

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 275-296

  Cutler, Anne ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLINGUISTICS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748807178     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1515/9783110197105     Document Type: Chapter

References (66)

1. Beckman, M. E. 1999 Implications for phonological theory. In W. J. Hardcastle & N. Hewlett (eds.), Coarticulation: Theory, Data and Techniques, (pp. 199-225). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Berinstein, A. E. 1979 A cross-linguistic study on the perception and production of stress. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics, 47.
3. Cluff, M. S. & Luce, P. A. 1990 Similarity neighborhoods of spoken two-syllable words, Retroactive effects on multiple activation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 551-563.
4. Connine, C. M., Blasko, D. G. & Wang, J. 1994 Vertical similarity in spoken word recognition: Multiple lexical activation, individual differences, and the role of sentence context. Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 624-636.
5. Cutler, A. 1987 Speaking for listening. In A. Allport, D. G. MacKay, W. Prinz & E. Scheerer (eds.), Language Perception and Production: Relationships between Listening, Speaking, Reading and Writing, (pp. 23-40). London: Academic Press.
6. Cutler, A. 1992a Psychology and the segment. In G. J. Docherty & D. R. Ladd (eds.), Papers in Laboratory Phonology II: Gesture, Segment, Prosody, (pp. 290-295). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Cutler, A. 1992b Why not abolish psycholinguistics? In W. U. Dressier, H. C. Luschiitzky, A. E. Pfeiffer & J. R. Rennison (eds.), Phonologica 1988, (pp. 77-87). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Cutler, A. & Butterfield, S. 1990 Durational cues to word boundaries in clear speech. Speech Communication, 9, 485-495.
9. Cutler, A., Demuth, K. & McQueen, J. M. 2002 Universality versus language-specificity in listening to running speech. Psychological Science, 13, 258-262.
10. Cutler, A., Mehler, J., Norris, D. G. & Segui, J. 1987 Phoneme identification and the lexicon. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 141-177.
11. Cutler, A. & Norris, D. G. 1988 The role of strong syllables in segmentation for lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 113-121.
12. Cutler, A., Ooijen, B. van, Norris, D. & Sanchez-Casas, R. 1996 Speeded detection of vowels: A cross-linguistic study. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 807-822.
13. Cutler, A. & Otake, T. 2002 Rhythmic categories in spoken-word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 296-322.
14. Cutler, A., Sebastián-Gallés, A., Soler Vilageliu, O. & Ooijen, A. van 2000 Constraints of vowels and consonants on lexical selection: Crosslinguistic comparisons. Memory & Cognition, 28, 746-755.
15. Dell, G. S. & Newman, J. E. 1980 Detecting phonemes in fluent speech. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 19, 609-623.
16. Dupoux, E., Pallier, C., Sebastián-Gallés, A. & Mehler, J. 1997 A destressing 'deafness' in French. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 406-421.
17. Ellis, L., Derbyshire, A. J. & Joseph, A. E. 1971 Perception of electronically gated speech. Language and Speech, 14, 229-240.
18. Farnetani, E. 1997 Coarticulation and connected speech processes. In W. J. Hardcastle & J. D. M. H. Laver (eds.), A Handbook of Phonetic Science, (pp. 371-404). Oxford: Blackwell.
19. Goldinger, S. D. 1998 Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. Psychological Review, 105, 251-279.
20. Goldinger, S. D., Luce, P. A. & Pisoni, D. A. 1989 Priming lexical neighbours of spoken words: Effects of competition and inhibition. Journal of Memory & Language, 28, 501-518.
21. Gow, D. W. & Gordon, P. C. 1995 Lexical and prelexical influences on word segmentation: evidence from priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 344-359.
22. Grosjean, F. & Frauenfelder, U. H. (eds.) 1996 Spoken Word Recognition Paradigms. Special issue of Language and Cognitive Processes, 11 (6).
23. Hardcastle, W. J. & Hewlett, N. (eds.) 1999 Coarticulation: Theory, Data and Techniques. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. Johnson, K. 1997 Speech perception without speaker normalization: An exemplar model. In K. Johnson & J. W. Mullennix (eds.), Talker Variability in Speech Processing, (pp. 145-166). San Diego: Academic Press.
25. Kuhl, P., Andruski, J., Chistovich, I., Chistovich, L., Kozhevnikova, E., Ryskina, V., Stolyarova, E., Sundberg, U. & Lacerda, F. 1997 Cross-language analysis of phonetic units in language addressed to infants. Science, 277, 684-686.
26. Kühnert, A. & Nolan, F. J. 1999 The origin of coarticulation. In W. J. Hardcastle & N. Hewlett (eds.), Coarticulation: Theory, Data and Techniques, (pp. 7-30). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. Lahiri, A. & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. 1991 The mental representation of lexical form, A phonological approach to the recognition lexicon. Cognition, 38, 245-294.
28. Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A. & Meyer, A. S. 1999 A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1-38.
29. Liberman, A. M., Cooper, F. S., Shankweiler, D. P. & Studdert-Kennedy, M. 1967 Perception of the speech code. Psychological Review, 74, 431-461.
30. Maddieson, I. 1984 Patterns of Sounds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. Marslen-Wilson, W. D. 1990 Activation, competition and frequency in lexical access. In G. T. M. Altmann (ed.), Cognitive Models of Speech Processing, (pp. 148-172). Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
32. Marslen-Wilson, W. & Warren, P. 1994 Levels of perceptual representation and process in lexical access: words, phonemes, and features. Psychological Review, 101, 653-675.
33. Martin, J. G. & Bunnell, H. T. 1981 Perception of anticipatory coarticulation effects. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 69, 559-567.
34. Martin, J. G. & Bunnell, H. T. 1982 Perception of anticipatory coarticulation effects in vowel-stop consonant-vowel sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 473-488.
35. McClelland, J. L. & Elman, J. L. 1986a The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 1-8 6.
36. McClelland, J. L. & Elman, J. L. 1986b Exploiting lawful variability in the speech wave. In J. Perkell & D. H. Klatt (eds.), Invariance and Variability in Speech Processes, (pp. 360-385). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
37. McQueen, J. M., Norris, D. G. & Cutler, A. 1994 Competition in spoken word recognition: Spotting words in other words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 20, 621-638.
38. McQueen, J. M., Norris, D. G. & Cutler, A. 1999 Lexical influence in phonetic decision-making: Evidence from subcategorical mismatches. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1363-1389.
39. McQueen, J. M., Otake, T. & Cutler, A. 2001 Rhythmic cues and possible-word constraints in Japanese speech segmentation. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 103-132.
40. Norris, D. G. 1994 Shortlist: A connectionist model of continuous speech recognition. Cognition, 52, 189-234.
41. Norris, D. G., McQueen, J. M. & Cutler, A. 1995 Competition and segmentation in spoken word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 21, 1209-1228.
42. Norris, D. G., McQueen, J. M. & Cutler, A. 2000 Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessary. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 299-325.
43. Norris, D. G., McQueen, J. M, Cutler, A. & Butterfield, S. 1997 The possible-word constraint in the segmentation of continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology, 34, 191-243.
44. Norris, D. G., Cutler, A., McQueen, J. M., Butterfield, S. & Kearns, R. 2001 Language-universal constraints on speech segmentation. Language and Cognitive Processes, 16, 637-660.
45. Nygaard, L. C. & Pisoni, D. B. 1995 Speech perception: New directions in research and theory. In J. L. Miller & P. D. Eimas (eds.), Speech, Language and Communication. Volume 11 of E. C. Carterette & M. P. Friedman (eds.), Handbook of Perception and Cognition, (pp. 63-96). NY: Academic Press.
46. Ooijen, B. van 1994 Processing of vowels and consonants. PhD Dissertation, University of Leiden.
47. Ooijen, B. van 1996 Vowel mutability and lexical selection in English: Evidence from a word reconstruction task. Memory & Cognition, 24, 573-583.
48. Otake, T., Hatano, G., Cutler, A. & Mehler, J. 1993 Mora or syllable? Speech segmentation in Japanese. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 358-378.
49. Pallier, C, Sebastián-Gallés, A., Felguera, T., Christophe, A. & Mehler, J. 1993 Attentional allocation within the syllabic structure of spoken words. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 373-389.
50. Picheny, A. A., Durlach, A. I. and Braida, L. D. 1985 Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing I: Intelligibility differences between clear and conversational speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 28, 96-103.
51. Picheny, A. A., Durlach, A. I. and Braida, L. D. 1986 Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing II: Acoustic characteristics of clear and conversational speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 29, 434-446.
52. Pitt, M. A. & Samuel, A. G. 1990 Attentional allocation during speech perception, How fine is the focus? Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 611-632.
53. Price, C., Indefrey, P. & Turennout, M. van 1999 The neural architecture underlying the processing of written and spoken word forms. In P. Hagoort & C. Brown (eds.), Neurocognition of Language, (pp. 211-240). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
54. Samuel, A. G. & Ressler, W. H. 1986 Attention within auditory word perception, Insights from the phoneme restoration illusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 12, 70-79.
55. Scott, D. R. & Cutler, A. 1984 Segmental phonology and the perception of syntactic structure. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 450-466.
56. Shillcock, R. C. 1990 Lexical hypotheses in continuous speech. In G. A. M. Altmann (ed.), Cognitive Models of Speech Processing: Psycholinguistic and Computational Perspectives, (pp. 24-49). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
57. Soto-Faraco, S., Sebastián-Gallés, A. & Cutler, A. 2001 Segmental and suprasegmental mismatch in lexical access. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 412-432.
58. Streeter, L. A. & Nigro, G. N. 1979 The role of medial consonant transitions in word perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 65, 1533-1541.
59. Tabossi, P., Burani, C. & Scott, D. 1995 Word identification in fluent speech. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 440-467.
60. Van Summers, W., Pisoni, D. B., Bernacki, R. H., Pedlow, R. I. & Stokes, A. A. 1988 Effects of noise on speech production: Acoustic and perceptual analyses. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 84, 917-928.
61. Vitevitch, M. S. & Luce, P. A. 1998 When words compete, Levels of processing in spoken word recognition. Psychological Science, 9, 325-329.
62. Vroomen, J. & de Gelder, A. 1995 Metrical segmentation and lexical inhibition in spoken word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 98-108.
63. Warner, N., Jongman, A., Sereno, J. & Kemps, R. submitted Subphonemic durational differences in production and perception. Journal of Phonetics.
64. Whalen, D. H. 1984 Subcategorical phonetic mismatches slow phonetic judgments. Perception & Psychophysics, 35, 49-64.
65. Whalen, D. H. 1991 Subcategorical phonetic mismatches and lexical access. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 351-360.
66. Zwitserlood, P. 1989 The locus of the effects of sentential-semantic context in spokenword processing. Cognition, 32, 25-64.