Frequency doubling illusion VEPs and automated perimetry in multiple sclerosis

Documenta Ophthalmologica

Volumn 113, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 29-41

  Ruseckaite, Rasa ^a   Maddess, Teddy ^a   Danta, Gytis ^a   James, Andrew Charles ^a  

^a AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Frequency doubling illusion; Multiple sclerosis; Optic neuritis; ROCs

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRITICAL FLICKER FUSION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; OPTIC NEURITIS; PERIMETER; PERIMETRY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL ILLUSION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; OPTIC NEURITIS; PERIMETRY; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; VISUAL FIELD TESTS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 33748690313     PISSN: 00124486     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10633-006-9011-3     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Kelly D (1966) Frequency doubling in visual responses. J Opt Soc Am 56(11): 1628-1633
2. Kelly D (1981) Nonlinear visual responses to flickering sinusoidal gratings. J Opt Soc Am 71(9): 1051-1055
3. Tyler CW (1974) Observations on spatial-frequency doubling. Perception 3: 81-86
4. Maddess T, Kulikowski J (1999) Apparent fineness of stationary compound gratings. Vision Res 39: 3404-3416
5. Kulikowski JJ (1975) Apparent fineness of briefly presented gratings: balance between movement and pattern channels. Vision Res 15: 673-680
6. Maddess T, Henry G (1992) Nonlinear visual responses and visual deficits in ocular hypertensive and glaucoma subjects. Clin Vis Sci 7: 371-383
7. Maddess T, Severt W, Stange G (2001) Comparison of three tests using the frequency doubling illusion to diagnose glaucoma. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 29: 359-367
8. Maddess T, Goldberg I, Wine S, Dobinson J, Welsh AH, James AC (1999) Testing for glaucoma with the spatial frequency doubling illusion. Vision Res 39: 4258-4273
9. Maddess T (2000) Perspectives on the use of frequency doubling and short wavelength perimetry for the diagnosis of glaucoma. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 28: 245-247
10. Maddess T, James A, Goldberg I, Wine S, Dobinson J (2000) Comparing a parallel PERG, automated perimetry, and frequency-doubling thresholds. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41(12): 3827-3832
11. Alward WLM (2000) Editorial: Frequency doubling perimetry for the detection of glaucomatous field loss. Am J Ophthalmol 129: 376-378
12. Cello K, Nelson-Quigg J, Johnson C (2000) Frequency doubling technology perimetry for detection of glaucomatous visual field loss. Am J Ophthalmol 129: 314-322
13. Chauhan B, Johnson C (1998) Test-retest variability characteristics of frequency doubling perimetry and conventional perimetry in patients with glaucoma and normal controls. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 39: 655-658
14. Blumenthal E, Sample P, Zangwill L, Lee A, Kono Y, Weinreb R (2000) Comparison of long term variability for standard and short-wavelength automated perimetry in stable glaucoma patients. Am J Ophthalmol 129: 309-313
15. Heijl A, Lindgren A, Lindgren G (1989) Test-retest variability in glaucomatous visual fields. Am J Ophthalmol 108: 130-135
16. Artes P, Iwase A, Ohno Y, Kitazawa Y, Chauhan B (2002) Properties of perimetric threshold estimates from full threshold, SITA Standard, and SITA Fast Strategies. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43: 2654-2659
17. Wall M, Johnson CA, Kutzko KE, Nguyen R, Brito C, Keltner JL (1998) Long- and short-term variability of automated perimetry results in patients with optic neuritis and healthy subjects. Arch Ophthalmol 116(1): 53-61
18. Fujimoto N, Adachi-Usami E (2000) Frequency doubling perimetry in resolved optic neuritis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41: 2558-2560
19. Wall M, Neahring RK, Woodward KR (2002) Sensitivity and specificity of frequency doubling perimetry in neuro-ophthalmic disorders: A comparison with conventional automated perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43(4): 1277-1283
20. Minagar A, Toledo EG, Alexander JS, Kelley RE (2004) Pathogenesis of brain and spinal cord atrophy in multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimaging 14 (3 Suppl): 5S-10S
21. Ruseckaite R, Maddess T, Danta G, Lueck C, James A (2005) Sparse multifocal stimuli for the detection of multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 57: 904-913
22. Compston A, Coles A (2002) Multiple sclerosis. Lancet 359(9313): 1221-1231
23. Ferguson B, Matyszak MK, Esiri MM, Perry VH (1997) Axonal damage in acute multiple sclerosis lesions. Brain 120 (Pt 3): 393-399
24. Andersson T, Siden A, Persson A (1991) A comparison of clinical and evoked potential (VEP and median nerve SEP) evolution in patients with MS and potentially related conditions. Acta Neurol Scand 84(2): 139-145
25. Brasil Neto J (1991) Evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis: Recent experience at the Locomotor System Diseases Hospital. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 49(2): 204-207
26. Sand T, Sjaastad O, Romslo I, Sulg I (1990) Brain-stem auditory evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis: The relation to VEP, SEP and CSF immunoglobulins. J Neurol 237(6): 376-378
27. Roder H (1991) VEP in the determination of multiple lesions in the visual system in patients with multiple sclerosis. EEG EMG Z Elektroenzephalogr Elektromyogr Verwandte Geb 22(4): 234-238
28. Hood D, Odel J, Zhang X (2000) Tracking the recovery of local optic nerve function after optic neuritis: A multifocal VEP study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41(12): 4032-4038
29. Maddess T, James A, Goldberg I, Wine S, Dobinson J (2000) A spatial frequency - doubling illusion - based pattern electroretinogram for glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41(12): 3818-3826
30. James A (2003) The pattern pulse multifocal visual evoked potential. Invest Opthalmol Vis Sci 44(2): 879-890
31. James A, Ruseckaite R, Maddess T (2005) Effect of temporal sparseness and dichoptic presentation upon multifocal visual evoked potential. Vis Neurosci 22: 45-54
32. Maddess T, James A, Bowman EA (2005) Contrast response of temporally sparse and contrast reversing dichoptic multifocal evoked potentials. Visual Neurosci 22: 153-162
33. McDonald W, Compston A, Edan G, Goodkin D, Hartung H, Lublin F et al (2001) Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the international panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 50: 121-127
34. Klistorner A, Graham S, Grigg J, Billson F (1998) Electrode position and the multi-focal visual-evoked potential: Role in objective visual field assessment. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol 26 (Suppl.): 91-94
35. Bedford S, Maddess T, Rose K, James A (1997) Correlations between observability of the spatial frequency doubled illusion, a multi-region PERG. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol 25: 91-93
36. Victor J, Shapley R (1980) A method of nonlinear analysis in the frequency domain. Biophys J 29(3): 459-483
37. Johnson R, Wichern D (1992) Applied multivariate statistical analysis, 3rd edn. Prentice-Hall, Inc
38. Egan J (1975) Signal detection theory and ROC analysis. London, Academic Press, Inc. Ltd
39. Capriolli J (1991) Automated perimetry in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 111: 235-239
40. McMillan SA, McDonnell GV, Douglas JP, Hawkins SA (2000) Evaluation of the clinical utility of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) indices of inflammatory markers in multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurol Scand 101(4): 239-243
41. Chamczuk AJ, Ursell M, O'Connor P, Jackowski G, Moscarello MA (2002) A rapid ELISA-based serum assay for myelin basic protein in multiple sclerosis. J Immunol Methods 262(1-2): 21-27
42. Brasher GW, Follender AB, Spiekerman AM (1998) The clinical value of commonly used spinal fluid diagnostic studies in the evaluation of patients with suspected multiple sclerosis. Am J Manag Care 4(8): 1119-1121
43. Ravnborg M, Liguori R, Christiansen P, Larsson H, Sorensen P (1992) The diagnostic reliability of magnetically evoked motor potentials in multiple sclerosis. Neurol 42(7): 1296-1301
44. van Diemen HA, Lanting P, Koetsier JC, Strijers RL, van Walbeek HK, Polman CH (1992) Evaluation of the visual system in multiple sclerosis: a comparative study of diagnostic tests. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 94(3): 191-195
45. De Stefano N, Matthews PM, Filippi M, Agosta F, De Luca M, Bartolozzi ML et al (2003) Evidence of early cortical atrophy in MS: Relevance to white matter changes and disability. Neurology 60(7): 1157-1162
46. Clanet M, Cassol E, Manelfe C, Berry I (2003) Clinical-MRI correlations in the secondary progressive phase of MS: Lessons from the treatment trials. J Neurol Sci 206(2): 139-144