Orthographic constraints and frequency effects in complex word identification

Written Language and Literacy

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 49-59

  Verhoeven, Ludo ^a   Baayen, Harald ^a   Schreuder, Robert ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84989405042     PISSN: 13876732     EISSN: 15706001     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/wll.7.1.06ver     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Allegre, M., & Gordon, P. 1999. Frequency effects and the representational status of regular inflections. Jounral of Memory and Language 40: 41-61.
2. Assink, E. M.H., Vooijs, C., & Knuijt, P.P.N.A. 2000. Prefixes as access units in visual word recognition: A comparison of Italian and Dutch data. Reading and Writing 12:149-168.
3. Baayen, H., Piepenbrock, R., & van Rijn, H. (1993). The CELEX lexical database. (CD-ROM). Philadelphia PA: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
4. Berninger, V.W. (ed.). 1994. The varieties of orthographic knowledge: Theoretical and developmental issues. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press
5. Burani, C., & Caramazza, A. 1987. Representation and processing of derived words. Language and Cognitive Processes 2:217-227.
6. Burani, C., & Laudanna, A. (1992). Units of representation of derived words in the lexicon. In R. Frost & L. Katz (eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology and meaning, 361-376. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
7. Coltheart, M. 1978. Lexical access in simple reading tasks. In G. Underwood (ed.), Strategies of information processing. New York: Academic Press.
8. Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., & Haller, M. 1993. Models of reading aloud: Dual route and parallel-distributed processing approaches. Psychological Review 100: 589-608.
9. Kooij, J.G. 1994. Dutch. In B. Comrie (ed.), The major languages of Western Europe, 139-156. London: Routledge.
10. Olson, R.K., & Wise, B.W. 1992. Reading on the computer with orthographic and speech feedback. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 4: 165-178.
11. Perfetti, C.A. 1992. The representation problem in reading acquisition. In P.B. Gough, L.C. Ehri, & R. Treiman (eds.), Reading acquisition, 145-174. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12. Perfetti, C.A. (1998). Learning to read. In P. Reitsma & L. Verhoeven (eds.), Literacy problems and interventions, 15-48. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
13. Plaut, D.C., McClelland, J.L., Seidenberg, M.S., & Patterson, K. 1996. Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review 103: 56-115.
14. Reitsma, P., & Verhoeven, L. 1990. Acquisition of reading in Dutch. Dordrecht: Foris.
15. Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. 1994. Prefix stripping re-revisited. Journal of Memory and Language 33: 357-375.
16. Schreuder, R., and Baayen, R.H. (1995). Modeling morphological processing. In L. Feldman (ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing, 131-157. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17. Seidenberg, M. 1987. Sublexical structures in visual word recognition. In M. Coltheart (ed.), Attention and performance XII, 245-263. Hove NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18. Share, D. L. 1995. Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition 55: 151-218.
19. Treiman, R. 1992. The role of intrasyllabic units in learning to read. In P. B. Gough, L. C. Ehri & R. Treiman (eds.), Reading acquisition, 65-106. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20. Treiman, R., & Zukowski, A. 1996. Children’s sensitivity to syllables, onsets, rimes and phonemes. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 61:193-215.
21. Van Orden, G. 1987. A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound and reading. Memory and Cognition 15: 181-198.
22. Van Orden, G., Pennington, B., & Stone, G. 1990. Word identification in reading and the promise of subsymbolic psycholinguistics. Psychological Review 97: 1-35.
23. Wentink, H.W.M.J. 1997. From graphemes to syllables: The development of phonological decoding skills in poor and normal readers. Doctoral dissertation, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
24. Yap, R. 1993. Automatic word processing deficits in dyslexia: Qualitative differences and specific remediation. Doctoral dissertation, Free University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.