Learning, belief biases, and metacognition

Journal of Cognition and Development

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 295-300

  Klaczynski, Paul A ^a  

^a NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR THEORY; COGNITION; COMPREHENSION; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; KNOWLEDGE; LEARNING; STATE DEPENDENT LEARNING; THINKING;

EID: 33748502124     PISSN: 15248372     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327647jcd0703_2     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Byrnes, J. M. (2005). The development of self-regulated decision-making. In J. E. Jacobs & P. A. Klaczynski (Eds.), The development of decision making in children and adolescents (pp. 5-38). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
2. Byrnes, J. P. (1998). The nature and development of decision-making: A self-regulation model. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
3. Evans, J. B. St. T. (2003). In two minds: Dual process accounts of reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7, 454-459.
4. Klaczynski, P. A. (2000). Motivated scientific reasoning biases, epistemological beliefs, and theory polarization: A two-process approach to adolescent cognition. Child Development, 71, 1347-1366.
5. Klaczynski, P. A. (2004). A dual-process model of adolescent development: Implications for decision making, reasoning, and identity. In R. V. Kail (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 31, pp. 73-123). San Diego, CA: Academic.
6. Klaczynski, P. A. (2005). Metacognition and cognitive variability: A dual-process model of decision making and its development. In J. E. Jacobs & P. A. Klaczynski (Eds.), The development of decision making in children and adolescents (pp. 39-76). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
7. Klaczynski, P. A., & Gordon, D. H. (1996). Self-serving influences on adolescents' evaluations of belief-relevant evidence. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 62, 317-339.
8. Klaczynski, P. A., & Narasimham, G. (1998). Development of scientific reasoning biases: Ego-protective versus cognitive explanations. Developmental Psychology, 34, 175-187.
9. Kuhn, D. (1989). Children and adults as intuitive scientists. Psychological Review, 96, 674-689.
10. Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
11. Kuhn, D. (2000). Metacognitive development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 178-181.
12. Kuhn, D. (2001). How do people know? Psychological Science, 12, 1-8.
13. Moshman, D. (1998). Cognitive development beyond childhood. In D. Kuhn & R. Siegler (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Cognition, perception, and language (5th ed., pp. 947-978). New York: Wiley.
14. Moshman, D. (2005). Adolescent psychological development (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
15. Stanovich, K. E. (1999). Who is rational? Studies of individual differences in reasoning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
16. Stanovich, K. E. (2003). The fundamental computational biases of human cognition: Heuristics that (sometimes) impair decision making and problem solving. In J. E. Davidson & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The psychology of problem solving (pp. 291-342). New York: Cambridge University Press.