The effects of glaucoma on the latency of the multifocal visual evoked potential

British Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 90, Issue 9, 2006, Pages 1132-1136

  Rodarte, C ^a   Hood, D C ^a   Yang, E B ^a   Grippo, T ^b   Greenstein, V C ^a   Liebmann, J M ^b   Ritch, R ^b  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^b NEW YORK EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL FEATURE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; LATENT PERIOD; MONOCULAR VISION; OPTIC DISK; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, OPHTHALMOLOGICAL; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; REACTION TIME; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 33748462100     PISSN: 00071161     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2006.095158     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Alkin A, Bodis-Wollner I, Podos SM, et al. Flicker threshold and pattern VEP latency in ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1983;24:1524-8.
2. Towle VL, Moskowitz A, Sokol S, et al. The visual evoked potential in glaucoma and ocular hypertension: effects of check size, field size, and stimulation rate. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1983;24:175-83.
3. Parisi V. Neural conduction in the visual pathways in ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1997;235:136-42.
4. Parisi V. Impaired visual function in glaucoma. Clinical Neurophysiol 2001;112:351-8.
5. Parisi V, Miglior S, Manni G, et al. Clinical ability of pattern electroretinograms and visual evoked potentials in detecting visual dysfunction in ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Ophthalmology 2006;113:216-28.
6. Rejdak R, Toczolowski J, Krukowski J, et al. Oral citicoline treatment improves visual pathway function in glaucoma. Med Sci Monit 2003;9:P124.
7. Baseler HA, Sutter EE, Klein SA, et al. The topography of visual evoked response properties across the visual field. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1994;90:65-81.
8. Klistomer AI, Graham SL, Grigg JR, et al. Multifocal topographic visual evoked potential: improving objective detection of local visual field defects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1998;39:937-50.
9. Hood DC, Zhang X, Greenstein VC, et al. An interocular comparison of the multifocal VEP: a possible technique for detecting local damage to the optic nerve. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000;41:1580-7.
10. Graham SL, Klistorner Al, Grigg JR, et al. Objective VEP perimetry in glaucoma: asymmetry analysis to identify early deficits. J Glaucoma 2000;9:10-19.
11. Hasegawa S, Abe M. Mapping of glaucomatous visual field defects by multifocal VEPs. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001;42:3341-8.
12. Goldberg I, Graham SL, Klistorner AI. Multifocal objective perimetry in the detection of glaucomatous field loss. Am J Ophthalmol 2002;133:29-39.
13. Fortune B, Goh K, Demirel S, et al. Detection of glaucomatous field loss using Multifocal VEP. In: Perimetry update 2002/2003. The Hague, Netherlands: Kugler Publications, 2004:251-60.
14. Hood DC, Greenstein VC. Multifocal VEP and ganglion cell damage: applications and limitations for the study of glaucoma. Prog Retin Eye Res 2003;22:201-51.
15. Thienprasiddhi P, Greenstein VC, Chen CS, et al. Multifocal VEP responses in glaucoma patients with unilateral hemifield defects. Am J Ophthalmol 2003;136:34-40.
16. Hood DC, Thienprasiddhi P, Greenstein VC, et al. Detecting early to mild glaucomatous damage: a comparison of the multifocal VEP and automated perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004;45:492-8.
17. Graham SL, Klistorner AI, Goldberg I. Clinical application of objective perimetry using multifocal visual evoked potentials in glaucoma practice. Arch Ophthalmol 2005;123:729-39.
18. Klistorner A, Balachandran C, Graham SL, et al. Multifocal VEP latency in glaucoma [ARVO abstract]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43: E-abstract, 2165.
19. Hood DC, Zhang X, Hong JE, Chen CS. Quantifying the benefits of additional channels of multifocal VEP recording. Doc Ophthalmol 2002;104:303-20.
20. Zhang X, Hood DC, Chen CS, et al. A signal-to-noise analysis of multifocal VEP responses: an objective definition for poor records. Doc Ophthalmol 2002;104:287-302.
21. Hood DC, Ohri N, Yang EB, et al. Determining abnormal latencies of multifocal visual evoked potentials: A monocular analysis. Doc Ophthalmol 2004;109:189-99.
22. Hood DC, Zhang X, Rodarte C, et al. Determining abnormal interocular latencies of multifocal visual evoked potentials. Doc Ophthalmol 2004;109:177-87.
23. Fortune B, Zhang X, Hood DC, et al. Normative ranges and specificity of the multifocal VEP. Doc Ophthalmol 2004;109:87-100.