Comparison of two computer-animated imaging programs for quantifying facial profile preference

Perceptual and Motor Skills

Volumn 84, Issue 3 PART 2, 1996, Pages 1251-1264

  Giddon, Donald B ^a,c   Evans, Carla A ^b   Bernier, Debbie Lynn ^a   Kinchen, Jason A ^c  

^a HARVARD SCHOOL OF DENTAL MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^c NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; FACIAL EXPRESSION; FEMALE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; MALE; MICROCOMPUTER; ORTHODONTICS; PERCEPTION DISORDER; TOOTH OCCLUSION; VISION;

ADULT; ATTENTION; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; DENTAL OCCLUSION, BALANCED; DOMINANCE, CEREBRAL; FACIAL EXPRESSION; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; MICROCOMPUTERS; ORTHODONTICS, CORRECTIVE; PERCEPTUAL DISTORTION; SOFTWARE; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0030159093     PISSN: 00315125     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2466/pms.1996.82.3c.1251     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. ANGLE, E. H. (1907) Malocclusion of the teeth. (7th ed.) Philadelphia, PA: SS White Dental Mfg. Co.
2. BACKSTROM, M. J., & ASHMORE, R. D. (1990) The multiplicity of physical attractiveness: categories and dimensions underlying college students' everyday language of beauty. Eastern Psychological Association, 1990 Annual Meeting, Philadelphia, PA. [Abstract]
3. BARTKO, J. J. (1966) The intraclass correlation coefficient as a measure of reliability. Psychological Reports, 19, 3-11.
4. BELL, R., KIYAK, H. A., JOONDEPH, D. R., MCNEILL, R. W., & WALLEN, T. R. (1985) Perceptions of facial profile and their influence on the decision to undergo orthognathic surgery. American Journal of Orthodontics, 88, 323-332.
5. BERGEMANN, K., & ASHMORE, R. D. (1990) Physical unattractiveness as a psychological multiplicity: categories and dimensions underlying college students' everyday language of ugliness. Eastern Psychological Association, 1990 Annual Meeting, Philadelphia, PA. [Abstract]
6. BRAUNSTEIN, M. L., & ANDERSON, G. J. (1984) Shape and depth perception from parallel projections of three-dimensional motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 749-760.
7. BURCAL, R. G., LASKIN, D. M., & SPERRY, T. P. (1987) Recognition of profile change after simulated orthognathic surgery. Journal of Maxillofacial Surgery, 45, 666-670.
8. FARKAS, L. G. (1994) Examination. In Anthropometry of the head and face. (2nd ed.) New York: Raven. Pp. 3-56.
9. GIDDON, D. B. (1995) Orthodontic applications of psychological and perceptual studies of facial esthetics. Seminars in Orthodontics, 1, 82-93.
10. GIDDON, D. B., MOSIER, M., COLTON, T., & BULMAN, J. S. (1976) Quantitative relationship between perceived and objective need for health care: dentistry as a model system. Public Health Reports, 91, 508-513.
11. GIDDON, D. B., SCONZO, R., KINCHEN, J. A., & EVANS, C. A. (1994) Psychophysical comparison of computerized discrete and animated profile preferences. Journal of Dental Research, 73, 368. [Abstract]
12. GIDDON, D. B., SCONZO, R., KINCHEN, J. A., & EVANS, C. A. (1996) Quantitative comparison of computerized discrete and animated profile preferences. Angle Orthodontist.
13. GRYPHON SOFTWARE CORPORATION. (1993) Morph (Windows Version 1.5). San Diego, CA: Author.
14. HAXTON, J., & GIDDON, D. B. (1985) Quantitation of tolerance for cranio-facial deviation. Journal of Dental Research, 64, 292.
15. KITAY, D. R. (1993) Computer animated imaging to determine discrepancies between objective and subjective profile measures. Unpublished post-doctoral thesis, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA.
16. KITAY, D. R., KINCHEN, J. A., EVANS, C. A., & GIDDON, D. B. (1993) Self perception of computer animated profiles in orthodontic/non-orthodontic patients. American Association of Orthodontists Annual Meeting Research Abstracts, 1, 38. [Abstract]
17. LUCKER, G. W. (1981) Esthetics and a quantitative analysis of facial appearance. In G. W. Lucker, K. A. Ribbens, & J. A. McNamara, Jr. (Eds.), Craniofacial growth series: Monograph No. 11. Psychological aspects of facial form. Ann Arbor, MI: Center for Human Growth and Development. Pp. 49-80.
18. MAXWELL, R., & KIYAK, H. A. (1991) Dentofacial appearance: a comparison of patient self-assessment techniques. The International Journal of Adult Orthognathics and Orthognathic Surgery, 6, 123-131.
19. OLZAK, L. A., & THOMAS, J. P. (1986) Seeing spatial patterns. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufmann, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and performance. Vol. 1. New York: Wiley. Pp. 7-1-7-56.
20. OSGOOD, C. E., SUCI, G. J., & TANNENBAUM, P. (1957) The measurement of meaning. Urbana, IL: Univer. of Illinois Press.
21. PRAHL-ANDERSON, B., BOERSMA, H., VAN DER LINDEN, F. P. G. M., & MOORE, A. W. (1979) Perceptions of dentofacial morphology by laypersons, general dentists, and orthodontists. Journal of the American Dental Association, 98, 209-212.
22. ROSENTHAL, R. (1987) Sampling judges and encoders. In Judgment studies. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge Univer. Press. Pp. 9-37.
23. SOLOW, B., & TALGREN, A. (1971) Natural head position in standing subjects. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica, 29, 591-607.
24. SPERLING, G., & LANDY, M. S. (1989) Kinetic depth effect and identification of shape. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 15, 826-840.
25. TEDESCO, L. A., ALBINO, J. E., CUNAT, J. J., GREEN, L. J., & LEWIS, E. A. (1983) A dental-facial attractiveness scale: part I. Reliability and validity. American Journal of Orthodontics, 83 (1), 38-43.
26. TODD, J. T. (1994) On the optic sphere theory and the nature of visual information. In G. Jansson, S. S. Bergstrom, & W. Epstein (Eds.), Perceiving events and objects. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 471-478.
27. TRUEVISION, INC. (1992) Truevision Image Processing Software (TIPS). Indianapolis, IN: Author.
28. WALLACH, H., & O'CONNELL, D. N. (1953) The kinetic depth effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45, 205-217.