Long-term follow-up of Class II adults treated with orthodontic camouflage: A comparison with orthognathic surgery outcomes

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 123, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 266-278

  Mihalik, Colin A ^a   Proffit, William R ^a   Phillips, Ceib ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL SURGERY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LONG TERM CARE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; ORTHODONTICS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; SURGICAL PATIENT; TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT DISORDER; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CEPHALOMETRY; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARE; METHODOLOGY; ORAL SURGERY; PEER REVIEW; QUESTIONNAIRE; RISK; SELF CONCEPT; TOOTH OCCLUSION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CEPHALOMETRY; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; DENTAL OCCLUSION; ESTHETICS, DENTAL; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS II; ODDS RATIO; ORAL SURGICAL PROCEDURES; ORTHODONTICS, CORRECTIVE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PEER REVIEW, HEALTH CARE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SELF CONCEPT;

EID: 0037366113     PISSN: 08895406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/mod.2003.43     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Proffit WR, White RP, Sarver DM. Contemporary treatment of dentofacial deformity. St. Louis: Mosby; 2003.
2. Proffit WR, Phillips C, Douvartzidis N. A comparison of outcomes of orthodontic and surgical-orthodontic treatment of Class II malocclusion in adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992;101:556-65.
3. Proffit WR, Turvey TA, Philips C. Orthognathic surgery: a hierarchy of stability. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 1996;11:191-204.
4. Simmons KE, Turvey TA, Phillips C, Proffit WR. Surgical-orthodontic correction of mandibular deficiency: five-year follow-up. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 1992;7:67-80.
5. Miguel JA, Turvey TA, Phillips C, Proffit WR. Long-term stability of two-jaw surgery for treatment of mandibular deficiency and vertical maxillary excess. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 1995;10:235-45.
6. Schubert P, Bailey LJ, White RP, Proffit WR. Long-term cephalometric changes in untreated adults compared to those treated with orthognathic surgery. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 1999;14:91-9.
7. Richmond S, Shaw WC, Roberts CT, Andrews M. The PAR index (Peer Assessment Rating): methods to determine outcome of orthodontic treatment in terms of improvement and standards. Eur J Orthod 1992;14:180-7.
8. Al Yami EA, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, Van't Hof MA. Stability of orthodontic treatment outcome: follow-up until 10 years postretention. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;115:300-4.
9. Otuyemi OD, Jones SP. Long-term evaluation of treated Class II division 1 malocclusions utilizing the PAR index. Brit J Orthod 1995;22:171-8.
10. Kiyak HA, Bell R. Psychosocial considerations in surgery and orthodontics. In: Proffit WR, White RP Jr, editors. Surgical-orthodontic treatment. Saint Louis: Mosby; 1991.
11. Phillips C, Proffit WR. The psychosocial effect of dentofacial deformity. In: Proffit WR, White RP, Sarver DM, editors. Contemporary treatment of dentofacial deformity. St. Louis: Mosby; 2002.
12. Bell R, Kiyak HA, Joondeph DR, McNeill RW, Wallen TR. Perceptions of facial profile and their influence on the decision to undergo orthognathic surgery. Am J Orthod 1985;88:323-32.
13. Phillips C, Hill BJ, Cannac C. The influence of video imaging on patients' perceptions and expectations. Angle Orthod 1995;65: 263-70.
14. Kiyak HA, Zeitler DL. Self-assessment of profile and body image among orthognathic surgery patients before and two years after surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1988;46:365-71.