Linking dynamical perceptual decisions at different levels of description in motion pattern formation: Computational simulations

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 68, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 515-533

  Nichols, David F ^a   Hock, Howard S ^a   Schöner, Gregor ^b  

^a FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b RUHR UNIVERSITY BOCHUM   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PERCEPTION; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MOTION PERCEPTION; PERCEPTION; STOCHASTIC PROCESSES;

EID: 33748364961     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03193694     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. ANSTIS, S., GIASCHI, D., & COGAN, A. I. (1985). Adaptation to apparent motion. Vision Research, 25, 1051-1062.
2. ANSTIS, S., & RAMACHANDRAN, V. S. (1987). Visual inertia in apparent motion. Vision Research, 27, 755-764.
3. BALOCH, A. A., & GROSSBERO, S. (1997). A neural model of high-level motion processing: Line motion and formotion dynamics. Vision Research, 37, 3037-3059.
4. BANTA, A. R., & BREITMEYER, B. G. (1985). Stationary patterns suppress the perception of stroboscopic motion. Vision Research, 25, 1501-1505.
5. BARTSCH, A., & VAN HEMMEN, J. L. (1997). A neural model of stroboscopic alternative motion. Network, 8, 107-126.
6. BREITMEYER, B., LOVE, R., & WEPMAN, B. (1974). Contour suppression during stroboscopic motion and metacontrast. Vision Research, 14, 1451-1456.
7. CARANDINI, M., & FERSTER, D. (1997). A tonic hyperpolarization underlying contrast adaptation in cat visual cortex. Science, 276, 949-952.
8. CARMESIN, H. O., & ARNDT, S. (1996). A neural network model for stroboscopic alternative motion. Biological Cybernetics, 75, 239-251.
9. CHAUDHURI, A., & GLASER, D. A. (1991). Metastable motion anisotropy. Visual Neuroscience, 7, 397-407.
10. CHEY, J., GROSSBERG, S., & MINGOLLA, E. (1997). Neural dynamics of motion grouping: From aperture ambiguity to object speed and direction. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 14, 2570-2594.
11. EASTMAN, K. E., & HOCK, H. S. (1999). Bistability in the perception of motion and stationarity: Effects of temporal asymmetry. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 1055-1065.
12. FRANCIS, G., & GROSSBERG, S. (1996). Cortical dynamics of form and motion integration: Persistence, apparent motion, and illusory contours. Vision Research, 36, 149-173.
13. GARDINER, C. W. (1983). Handbook of stochastic methods for physics, chemistry, and the natural sciences. Berlin: Springer.
14. GEPSHTEIN, S., & KUBOVY, M. (2005). Stability and change in perception: Spatial organization in temporal context. Experimental Brain Research, 160, 487-495.
15. GIASCHI, D., DOUGLAS, R., MARLIN, S., & CYNADER, M. (1993). The time course of direction-selective adaptation in simple and complex cells in cat striate cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 70, 2024-2034.
16. GILBERT, C. D. (1992). Horizontal integration and cortical dynamics. Neuron, 9, 1-20.
17. GILROY, L. A., HOCK, H. S., & PLOEGER, A. (2001). Differential activation solution to the motion correspondence problem. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 847-861.
18. GROSSBERG, S. (1980). Biological competition: Decision rules, pattern formation, and oscillations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 77, 2338-2342.
19. GROSSBERG, S., MINGOLLA, E., & VISWANATHAN, L. (2001). Neural dynamics of motion integration and segmentation within and across apertures. Vision Research, 41, 2521-2553.
20. HEEGER, D. J., BOYNTON, G. M., DEMB, J. B., SEIDEMANN, E., & NEWSOME, W. T. (1999). Motion opponency in visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 19, 7162-7174.
21. HOCK, H. S., & BALZ, G. W. (1994). Spatial scale dependent in-phase and anti-phase directional biases in the perception of self-organized motion patterns. Vision Research, 34, 1843-1861.
22. HOCK, H. S., KELSO, J. A. S., & SCHÖNER, G. (1993). Bistability and hysteresis in the organization of apparent motion patterns. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 63-80.
23. HOCK, H. S., KOGAN, K., & ESPINOZA, J. K. (1997). Dynamic, state-dependent thresholds for the perception of single-element apparent motion: Bistability from local cooperativity. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 1077-1088.
24. HOCK, H. S., NICHOLS, D. F., & ESPINOZA, J. [K.] (2004). When motion is not perceived: Evidence from adaptation and dynamical stability. Spatial Vision, 17, 235-248.
25. HOCK, H. S., & PLOEGER, A. (2006). Linking dynamical perceptual decisions at different levels of description in motion pattern formation: Psychophysics. Perception & Psychophysics, 68, 505-514.
26. HOCK, H. S., SCHÖNER, G., & GIESE, M. (2003). The dynamical foundations of motion pattern formation: Stability, selective adaptation, and perceptual continuity. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 429-451.
27. HOCK, H. S., SCHÖNER, G., & HOCHSTEIN, S. (1996). Perceptual stability and the selective adaptation of perceived and unperceived motion. Vision Research, 36, 3311-3323.
28. HUK, A. C., RESS, D., & HEEGER, D. J. (2001). Neuronal basis of the motion aftereffect reconsidered. Neuron, 32, 161-172.
29. KAWAMOTO, A. H., & ANDERSON, J. A. (1985). A neural network model of multistable perception. Acta Psychologica, 59, 35-65.
30. KLOEDEN, P. E., & PLATEN, E. (1999). Numerical solution of stochastic differential equations. Berlin: Springer.
31. KOHN, A., & MOVSHON, J. A. (2003). Neuronal adaptation to visual motion in Area MT of the macaque. Neuron, 39, 681-691.
32. KRUSE, P., STADLER, M., & WEHNER, T. (1986). Direction and frequency specific processing in the perception of long-range apparent movement. Vision Research, 26, 327-335.
33. KRUSE, W., DANNENBERG, S., KLEISER, R., & HOFFMANN, K.-P. (2002). Temporal relation of population activity in visual areas MT/MST and in primary motor cortex during visually guided tracking movements. Cerebral Cortex, 12, 466-476.
34. KULIKOWSKI, J. J. (1978). Spatial resolution for the detection of pattern and movement (real and apparent). Vision Research, 18, 237-238.
35. LEOPOLD, D. A., WILKE, M., MAIER, A., & LOGOTHETIS, N. K. (2002). Stable perception of visually ambiguous patterns. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 605-609.
36. LEVINSON, E., & SEKULER, R. (1975). Inhibition and disinhibition of direction-specific mechanisms in human vision. Nature, 254, 692-694.
37. MAUNSELL, J. H., & VAN ESSEN, D. C. (1983). Functional properties of neurons in middle temporal visual area of the macaque monkey: I. Selectivity for stimulus direction, speed, and orientation. Journal of Neurophysiology, 49, 1127-1147.
38. MOVSHON, J. A., & NEWSOME, W. T. (1996). Visual response properties of striate cortical neurons projecting to area MT in macaque monkeys. Journal of Neuroscience, 16, 7733-7741.
39. MOVSHON, J. A., THOMPSON, I. D., & TOLHURST, D. J. (1978). Receptive field organization of complex cells in the cat's striate cortex. Journal of Physiology, 283, 79-99.
40. NAKA, K. I., & RUSHTON, W. A. (1966). S-potentials from luminosity units in the retina offish (Cyprinidae). Journal of Physiology, 185, 587-599.
41. ORBACH, J., EHRLICH, D., & HEATH, H. A. (1963). Reversibility of the Necker cube: I. An examination of the concept of "satiation of orientation." Perceptual & Motor Skills, 17, 439-458.
42. PLOEGER, A., VAN DER MAAS, H. L. J., & HARTELMAN, P. A. I. (2002). Stochastic catastrophe analysis of switches in the perception of apparent motion. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 26-42.
43. PRIEBE, N. J., CHURCHLAND, M. M., & LISBERGER, S. G. (2002). Constraints on the source of short-term motion adaptation in macaque area MT: I. The role of input and intrinsic mechanisms. Journal of Neurophysiology, 88, 354-369.
44. RECANZONE, G. H., WURTZ, R. H., & SCHWARZ, U. (1997). Responses of MT and MST neurons to one and two moving objects in the receptive field. Journal of Neurophysiology, 78, 2904-2915.
45. SANCHEZ-VIVES, M. V., NOWAK, L. G., & MCCORMICK, D. A. (2000). Membrane mechanisms underlying contrast adaptation in cat area 17 in vivo. Journal of Neuroscience, 20, 4267-4285.
46. SCHÖNER, G., & HOCK, H. S. (1995). Concepts for a dynamical theory of perceptual organization: An example from apparent movement. In P. Kruse & M. Stadler (Eds.), Ambiguity in mind and nature (pp. 275-310). Berlin: Springer.
47. SHIM, W. M., & CAVANAGH, P. (2004). The motion-induced position shift depends on the perceived direction of bistable quartet motion. Vision Research, 44, 2393-2401.
48. SNOWDEN, R. J., TREUE, S., ERICKSON, R. G., & ANDERSEN, R. A. (1991). The response of area MT and V1 neurons to transparent motion. Journal of Neuroscience, 11, 2768-2785.
49. STERZER, P., EGER, E., & KLEINSCHMIDT, A. (2003). Responses of extrastriate cortex to switching perception of ambiguous visual motion stimuli. NeuroReport, 14, 2337-2341.
50. TANAKA, K., & SAITO, H.-A. (1989). Analysis of motion of the visual field by direction, expansion/contraction, and rotation cells clustered in the dorsal part of the medial superior temporal area of the macaque monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology, 62, 643-656.
51. THIELE, A., DOBKINS, K. R., & ALBRIGHT, T. D. (2000). Neural correlates of contrast detection at threshold. Neuron, 26, 715-724.
52. TOLIAS, A. S., SMIRNAKIS, S. M., AUGATH, M. A., TRINATH, T., & LOGOTHETIS, N. K. (2001). Motion processing in the macaque: Revisited with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Neuroscience, 21, 8594-8601.
53. VAUTIN, R. G., & BERKLEY, M. A. (1977). Responses of single cells in cat visual cortex to prolonged stimulus movement: Neural correlates of visual aftereffects. Journal of Neurophysiology, 40, 1051-1065.
54. WILLIAMS, D., PHILLIPS, G., & SEKULER, R. (1986). Hysteresis in the perception of motion direction as evidence for neural cooperativity. Nature, 324, 253-255.
55. WILSON, H. R. (1998). Spikes, decisions, and actions: The dynamical foundations of neuroscience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
56. WILSON, H. R., & KIM, J. (1994). A model for motion coherence and transparency. Visual Neuroscience, 11, 1205-1220.