Bistability in the perception of motion and stationarity: Effects of temporal asymmetry

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 61, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 1055-1065

  Eastman, Kathleen E ^a   Hock, Howard S ^b  

^a NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; RECEPTIVE FIELD;

ADULT; ATTENTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; FIELD DEPENDENCE-INDEPENDENCE; HUMANS; MOTION PERCEPTION; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME;

EID: 0033175896     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03207613     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. BRADDICK, O. J. (1974). A short-range process in apparent motion. Vision Research, 14, 519-527.
2. BRADDICK, O. J. (1980). Low-level and high-level processes in apparent motion. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Series B, 290, 137-151.
3. CASCO, C., & MORGAN, M. (1987). Detection of moving local density differences in dynamic random patterns by human observers. Perception, 16, 711-717.
4. CASCO, C., MORGAN, M., & WARD, M. (1989). Spatial properties of mechanisms for detection of moving targets in dynamic visual noise. Perception, 18, 285-291.
5. CAVANAGH, P. (1992). Attention-based motion perception. Science, 257, 1563-1565.
6. GROSSBERG, S., & RUDD, M. E. (1992). Cortical dynamics of visual motion perception: Short-range and long-range apparent motion. Psychological Research, 99, 78-121.
7. HOCK, H. S., BALZ, G. B., & EASTMAN, K. E. (1996). Cooperative interactions and the perception of motion and stationarity for directionally ambiguous apparent-motion stimuli. Perception, 25, 887-900.
8. HOCK, H. S., KELSO, J. A. S., & SCHÖNER, G. (1993). Bistability and hysteresis in the organization of apparent motion patterns. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 63-80.
9. HOCK, H. S., KOGAN, K., & ESPINOZA, J. K. (1997). Dynamic, state-dependent thresholds for the perception of single-element apparent motion: Bistability from local cooperativity. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 1077-1088.
10. ORBAN, G. A., KENNEDY, H., & BULLIER, J. (1986). Velocity sensitivity and direction selectivity of neurons in Areas V1 and V2 of the monkey: Influence of eccentricity. Journal of Neurophysiology, 56, 462-480.
11. PANTLE, A. J., & PICCIANO, L. (1976). A multistable movement display: Evidence for two separate motion systems in human vision. Science, 193, 500-502.
12. POSNER, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3-25.
13. RAMACHANDRAN, V. S., & ANSTIS, S. M. (1983). Displacement thresholds for coherent apparent motion in random dot-patterns. Vision Research, 23, 1719-1724.
14. SCHRATER, P. R. (1998). Evidence for local velocity detectors: Additivity and selective pooling of spatio-temporal frequencies consistent with local translation [Abstract]. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 39, S426.
15. TERNUS, J. (1926). Experimentelle Untersuchungen über phänomenale Identät [Experimental investigations of phenomenal identity], Psycologische Forschung, 7, 81-136.
16. VAN SANTEN, J. P., & SPERLING, H. G. (1985). Elaborated Reichardt detectors. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 2, 300-320.
17. WILLIAMS, D., PHILLIPS, G., & SEKULER, R. (1986). Hysteresis in the perception of motion direction as evidence for neural cooperativity. Nature, 324, 253-255.