Cooperative self-assembly of adenosine and uridine nucleotides on a 2D synthetic template

Angewandte Chemie - International Edition

Volumn 45, Issue 32, 2006, Pages 5340-5344

  Turygin, Dmitry S ^b   Subat, Michael ^a   Raitman, Oleg A ^b   Arslanov, Vladimir V ^b   König, Burkhard ^a   Kalinina, Maria A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF REGENSBURG   (Germany)

^b FRUMKIN INSTITUTE OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY AND ELECTROCHEMISTRY   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

Base pairing cooperativity; Macrocycles; Nucleobases; Self assembly; Thin films

Indexed keywords

BASE PAIRING COOPERATIVITY; MACROCYCLES; NUCLEOBASES;

REAL TIME SYSTEMS; THIN FILMS; ZINC;

SELF ASSEMBLY;

ADENOSINE; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE; URIDINE;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; CONFORMATION; SYNTHESIS;

ADENOSINE; MODELS, MOLECULAR; NUCLEIC ACID CONFORMATION; OLIGONUCLEOTIDES; URIDINE;

EID: 33748321025     PISSN: 14337851     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/anie.200600450     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. a) L. J. Prins, D. N. Reinhoudt, P. Timmerman, Angew. Chem. 2001, 113, 2446-2492;
2. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 2382-2426;
3. b) J. L. Sessler, J. Jayawickramarajah, Chem. Commun. 2005, 15, 1939;
4. c) J. Rao, J. Lahiri, R. M. Weis, G. M. Whitesides, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 2698.
5. a) J. D. Badjicä, A. Nelson, S. J. Cantrill, W. B. Turnbull, J. F. Stoddart, Acc. Chem. Res. 2005, 38, 723;
6. b) J. Huskens, A. Mulder, T. Auletta, C. A. Nijhuis, M. J. W. Ludden, D. N. Reinhoudt, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 17 050;
7. c) S. J. Metallo, R. S. Kane, R. E. Holmlin, G. M. Whitesides, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 4534;
8. d) S. Flink, F. C. J. M. vanVeggel, D. N. Reinhoudt, Adv. Mater. 2000, 12, 1315.
9. M. Weisser, J. Kalshammer, B, Menges, J. Matsumoto, F. Nakamura, K. Ijiro, M. Shimomura, S. Mittler, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 87.
10. a) A. Sanyal, T. B. Norsten, O. Uzun, V. M. Rotello, Langmuir 2004, 20, 5958;
11. b) K. Matsuura, Y. Ebara, Y. Okahata, Langmuir 1997, 13, 814;
12. c) Y. Sato, H. Noda, F. Mizutani, A. Yamakata, M. Osawa, Anal. Chem. 2004, 76, 5564.
13. a) M. Weck, R. Fink, H. Ringsdorf, Langmuir 1997, 13, 3515;
14. b) F. Nakamura, K. Ijiro, M. Shimomura, Thin Solid Films 1998, 327-329, 603;
15. c) R. Marczak, V. T. Hoang, K. Noworyta, M. E. Zandler, W. Kutner, F. D'Souza, J. Mater. Chem. 2002, 12, 2123;
16. d) J Chen, A Berman, Nanotechnology 2004, 15, S303;
17. e) K. Taguchi, K. Ariga, T. Kunitake, Chem. Lett. 1995, 701.
18. a) N. K. Devaraj, G. P. Miller, W. Ebina, B. Kakaradov, J. P. Collman, E. T. Kool, C. E. D. Chidsey, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 8600;
19. b) A. B. Steel, T. M. Herne, M. J. Tarlov, Anal. Chem. 1998, 70, 4670.
20. J. C. Love, L. A. Estroff, J. K. Kriebel, R. G. Nuzzo, G. M. Whitesides, Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 1103.
21. K. Ariga, T. Kunitake, Acc. Chem. Res. 1998, 31, 371.
22. a) J. D. Chartres, L. F. Lindoy, G. V. Meehan, Coord. Chem. Rev. 2001, 216-217, 249;
23. b) S. Aoki, A. Jikiba, K. Takeda, E. Kimura, J. Phys. Org. Chem. 2004, 17, 489.
24. a) T. Walenzyk, B. Koenig, Inorg. Chim. Acta 2005, 358, 2269;
25. b) T. Koike, S. Kajitani, I. Nakamura, E. Kimura, M. Shiro, J. Am. Chem. Soc 1995, 117, 1210.
26. S. C. Ritter, M. Eiblmaier, V. Michlova, B. Koenig, Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 5241.
27. a) T. Koike, M. Takamura, E. Kimura, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 8443;
28. b) E. Kimura, E. Kikuta, J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 2000, 5, 139;
29. c) R. Cibulka, R. Vasold, B. Koenig, Chem. Eur. J. 2004, 10, 6223.
30. a) E. Kinoshita, E. Kinoshita-Kikuta, T. Koike, Anal. Biochem. 2005, 337, 154;
31. b) E. Kinoshita-Kikuta, E. Kinoshita, T. Koike, Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30, 126;
32. c) E. Kimura, T. Ikeda, S. Aoki, M. Shionoya, J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 1998, 3, 259;
33. d) E. Kimura, H. Kitamura, K. Ohtani, T. Koike, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 4668.
34. II-cyclen); para isomers with a longer distance between cyclic fragments acted as more efficient divalent receptors than meta dimers for the most of investigated nucleotides. However, the meta isomer was found to be a more appropriate host for 2′-UMP as the intercycle distance in the para isomer was too long for simultaneous coordination of both phosphate and imide groups of the nucleotide.
35. II-BC films with an estimated surface coverage and SPR data on the adsorption of other nucleotide combinations that are not described in the main text are also included in the Supporting Information.
36. i values that are given account for the "rinsing" decrease in the SPR signal that normally fell within a range of 0.1-0.3 angle min; maximal "rinsing" decrease was observed after first-stage adsorption.
37. J. Homola, Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2003, 377, 528.
38. The two-stage binding of these nucleotides in reversed order (UMP after ATP) followed the recognition pattern similar to that observed for all other binary combinations - slow initial adsorption of ATP promoted faster and more pronounced responses to UMP (the SPR curve is given in the Supporting Information).
39. 6). For an overview and examples, see Ref. [8];
40. for recent examples applying this effect, see: a) Peptide and protein recognition at mono- and bilayers. Equimolar mixed monolayers of a diglycine and a guanidinium amphiphile were shown to bind free dipeptides by a guanidinium carboxylate interaction and stable antiparallel hydrogen bonds among the peptide chains. K. Ariga, A. Kamino, X. Cha, T. Kunitake, Langmuir 1999, 15, 3875-3885;
41. b) Size matching of amino acid residues in host and guest leads to a certain sequence selectivity for aliphatic peptides. Synthetic bilayers were evenly covered with phosphate anions to bind basic proteins in water at millimolar concentrations. N. Kimzuka, A. Baba, T. Kunitake, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 1764-1765;
42. c) Matile reported a possible explanation for the cell-permeating activity of arginine-rich protein transduction domains, which have received considerable attention because they transport anionic substrates across membranes. Extensive phase-transfer experiments with liquid and bilayer membranes support their concept of "counteranion scavenging". N. Sakai, S. Matile, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 14 348-14 356;
43. d) Koh immobilized BSA on gold surfaces by non-covalent interaction with calix[4]arene derivatives carrying carboxylate groups at their upper rims. The new SAMs were examined with SPR and showed a higher BSA concentration on those surfaces covered with carboxylates rather than those with ester groups. M. Lee, W. G. An, J.-H. Kim, H.-J. Choi, S.-H. Kim, M.-H. Han, K. Koh, Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2004, 24, 123-126;
44. e) Membrane-embedded synthetic receptors showed nanomolar affinities to proteins. R. Zadmard, T. Schrader, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 904-915;
45. S. Kolusheva, O. Molt, M. Herm, T. Schrader, R. Jelinek, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 10 000-10 001.
46. A major energetic contribution for assembly comes from base-stacking, whereas hydrogen bonding contributes to the selectivity of the process.