Task selection and enriched environments: A functional upper extremity training program for stroke survivors

Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 1-11

  Davis, Jan Z ^a  

^a International Clinical Educators Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Arm; Environment; Function; Hemiplegia; Motor; Recovery; Rehabilitation; Stroke; Task oriented

Indexed keywords

ARM EXERCISE; ARTICLE; COGNITION; CONSTRAINT INDUCED THERAPY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; ENVIRONMENTAL ENRICHMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; HEMIPLEGIA; HUMAN; MOTOR CONTROL; MOVEMENT THERAPY; PATIENT SAFETY; PSYCHOTHERAPIST; SELF CARE; SENSATION; STROKE; TRAINING; VISION;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ARM; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; HUMANS; PHYSICAL STIMULATION; PRACTICE (PSYCHOLOGY); PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; STROKE;

EID: 33748267701     PISSN: 10749357     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1310/D91V-2NEY-6FL5-26Y2     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Dunton WR. The principles of occupational therapy. Public Health Nurse. 1918;10:316-321.
2. Florey LL. Intrinsic motivation: the dynamics of occupational therapy theory. Am J Occup Ther. 1969; 23:319-322.
3. Yerxa E. Authentic occupational therapy. Am J Occup Ther. 1967;21:1-9.
4. Aisen FL, Krebs HI, Hogan N, McDowell F, Volpe BT. The effect of robot-assisted therapy and rehabilitation training on motor recovery following stroke. Arch Neural. 1997;54:443-446.
5. Volpe BT, Krebs HI, Hogan N, Edelstein L, Diels C, Aisen M. A novel approach to stroke rehabilitation: robot-aided sensorimotor stimulation. Neurology. 2000;54(10):1938-1944.
6. Ferraro M, Palazzolo JJ, Drol J, Drebs HI, Hogan N, Volpe BT. Robot-aided sensorimotor arm training improves outcome in patients with chronic stroke. Neurology. 2003;61:1604-1607.
7. Lum PS, Burgar CG, Shor PC, Majmundar M, Van der Loos M. Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83:952-959.
8. Volpe BT, Kreps HI, Hogan N, Edelsteinn L, Diels CM, Aisen ML. Robot training enhanced motor outcome in patients with stroke maintained over 3 years. Neurology. 1999;53(8):1874-1876.
9. Merletti R, Zelasci F, Latella D, Galli M, Angeli S, Sessa MB. A control study of muscle force recovery in hemiparetic patients during treatment with functional electrical stimulation. Scan J Rehabil Med. 1978;10:147-154.
10. Bowman BR, Baker LL, Waters RL. Positional feedback and electrical stimulation: an automated treatment for the hemiplegic wrist. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1979;60:492-502.
11. Kraft GH, Fitts SS, Hammond MC. Techniques to improve function of the arm and hand in chronic hemiplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992;73:220-227.
12. Levin MF, Hui-Chan CWY. Relief of hemiparetic spasticity by TENS is associated with improvement in reflex and voluntary motor functions. Electroencephelogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1992;85:131-142.
13. Faghri PD, Rodgers MM, Glaser RM, Bors JG, Ho C, Akuthota P. The effects of functional electrical stimulation on shoulder subluxation, arm function recovery, and shoulder pain in hemiplegic stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75:73-79.
14. Hummelsheim H, Maier-Loth ML, Eickhof C. The functional value of electrical muscle stimulation for the rehabilitation of the hand in stroke patients. Scandl Rehabil Med. 1997;29:3-10.
15. Chae J, Bethoux F, Bohine T, Dobos L, Davis T, Friedl A. Neuromuscular stimulation for upper extremity motor and functional recovery in acute hemiplegia. Stroke. 1998;29:975-979.
16. Glanz M, Klawansky S, Stason W, Berkey C, Chalmeres TC. Functional electrostimulation in post-stroke rehabilitation: a meta-analysis of the randomized controlled trials. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;77:549-553.
17. De Kroon JR, van der Lee JH, Ijzerman MJ, Lankhorst GJ. Therapeutic electrical stimulation to improve motor control and functional abilities of the upper extremity after stroke: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2002;16:350-360.
18. Barker RN, Brauer SG. Upper limb recovery after stroke: the stroke survivors' perspective. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27(20):1213-1223.
19. Bach-y-Rita P. Theoretical and practical considerations in the restoration of function after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2001;8(3):1-15.
20. Teasell RW, Foley NC, Sanjit KB, Speechley MR. An evidence-based review of stroke rehabilitation. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2003;10(1):29-58.
21. Lincoln NB, Parry RH, Vass CD. Randomized, controlled trial to evaluate increased intensity of physiotherapy treatment of arm function after stroke. Stroke. 1999;30(3):573-579.
22. Parry RH, Lincoln N, Appleyard M. Physiotherapy for the arm and hand after stroke. Physiotherapy. 1999;85(8):417-425.
23. Sutherland A, Fletcher D, Bradley L, Tinson D, Hewer RL, Wade DT. Enhanced physical therapy for arm function after stroke: a one-year follow up study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1994;57(7):856-858.
24. Van Peppen RPS, Kwakkel G, Wood-Dauphinee S, Hendriks HJM, Van der Wees PhJ, Dekker J. The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: What's the evidence? Clin Rehabil. 2004;18:833-862.
25. Bach-y-Rita P. Conceptual issues relevant to present and future neurologic rehabilitation. In: Levin H, Grafman J, eds. Neuroplasticity and Reorganization of Function After Brain Injury. New York: Oxford University Press; 2000:357-379.
26. Nudo RJ, Barbay S, Kleim JA. Role of neuroplasticity in functional recovery after stroke. In: Levin H, Grafman J, eds. Neuroplasticity and Reorganization of Function After Brain Injury. New York: Oxford University Press; 2000.
27. Fisher BE, Sullivan KJ. Activity-dependent factors affecting poststroke functional outcomes. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2001;8:31-44.
28. Nudo RJ, Milliken GW, Jenkins WM, Merzenich MM. Use-dependent alterations of movement representations in primary motor cortex of adult squirrel monkeys. J Neurosci. 1996;16:785-807.
29. Chu CJ, Jones TA. Experience-dependent structural plasticity in cortex heterotopic to focal sensorimotor cotrical damage. Exp Neurol. 2000;166:403-414.
30. Black JE, Isaacs KR, Anderson BJ, Alcantara AA, Greenough WT. Learning causes synaptiogenesis, whereas motor activity causes angiogenesis, in cerebellar cortex of adult rats. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1990;87:5568-5572.
31. Xerri C, Merzenich MM, Peterson BE, Jenkins W. Plasticity of primary somatosensory cortex paralleling sensorimotor skill recovery from stroke in adult monkeys. J Neurophysiol. 1998;79:2119-2148.
32. Dobkin BH. Strategies for stroke rehabilitation. Lancet Neurol. 2004;3:528-536.
33. Hanlon R. Motor learning following unilateral stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;77:811-815.
34. Morris DM, Crago JE, DeLuca SC, Pidikiti RD, Taub E. Constraint-induced movement therapy for motor recovery after stroke. NeuroRehabil. 1997;9:29-43.
35. Taub E, Uswatte G, Pidikiti R. Constraint-induced movement therapy: a new family of techniques with broad application to physical rehabilitation - a clinical review. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1999;36:237-251.
36. Kunkel A, Kopp B, Muller G, et al. Constraint-induced movement therapy for motor recovery in chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80:624-628.
37. Miltner WH, Bauder H, Sommer M, Dettmers C, Taub E. Effects of constraint-induced movement therapy on patients with chronic motor deficits after stroke: a replication. Stroke. 1999;30:586-592.
38. Taub E, Miller NE, Novack TA, et al. Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;74:347-354.
39. Van der Lee JH, Wagenaar RC, Lankhorst GJ, Vogelaar TW, Deville WL, Bouter LM. Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients: results from a single-blind randomized clinical trial. Stroke. 1999;30:2369-2375.
40. Taub E, Wolf SL. Constraint induced movement techniques to facilitate upper extremity use in stroke patients. Top Stroke Rehabil. 1997;3:38-61.
41. Rose DK, Winstein CJ. Bimanual training after stroke: Are two hands better than one? Top Stroke Rehabil. 2004;11(4):20-30.
42. Whitall J, Waller SM, Silver KHC, Macko RF. Repetitive bilateral arm training with rhythmic auditory cueing improves motor function in chronic hemiparetic stroke. Stroke. 2000;31:2390-2395.
43. McCombe-Waller S, Whitall J. Fine motor control in adults with and without chronic hemiparesis: baseline comparison to nondisabled adults and effects of bilateral arm training. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:1076-1083.
44. Hesse S, Schulte-Tigges G, Konrad M, Bardeleben A, Werner C. Robot-assisted arm trainer for the passive and active practice of bilateral forearm and wrist movements in hemiparetic subjects. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84:915-920.
45. Mudie HM, Matyas TA. Can simultaneous bilateral movement involve the undamaged hemisphere in reconstruction of neural networks damage by stroke? Disabil Rehabil. 2000;22:23-37.
46. Lewis G, Byblow W. Neurophysiological and behavioral adaptations to a bilateral training intervention in individuals following stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2004;18:48-59.
47. Cauraugh J, Kim S. Two coupled motor recovery protocols are better than one. Stroke. 2002;33:1589-1594.
48. World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2001.
49. Keith RA, Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Sherwin FS. The functional independence measure: a new tool for rehabilitation. In: Eisenberg MG, Grzesiak RC, eds. Advances in Clinical Rehabilitation, Volume 1. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1987:6-18.
50. Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Maryland State Med J. 1965;14:61-65.
51. Dean CM, Shepherd RB. Task-related training improves performance of seated reaching tasks after stroke. A randomized controlled trial. Stroke. 1997; 28(4):722-728.
52. Affolter F. Wahrnehmung, Wirklichkeit und Sprache. Villingen- Schwenningen, Germany: Neckar-Verlag; 1987.
53. Davies PM. Steps to Follow: The Comprehensive Treatment of Patients with Hemiplegia, 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer Verlag; 2000:30-33.
54. Jones TA, Hawrylak N, Klintsova AY, Greenough WT. Brain damage, behavior, rehabilitation, recovery, and brain plasticity. Ment Retard Developmental Disabilities. 1998;4:231-237.
55. Bach-y-Rita P. Brain plasticity as a basis for therapeutic procedures. In: Bach-y-Rita P, ed. Recovery of Function: Theoretical Considerations for Brain Injury Rehabilitation. Bern, Switzerland: H. Huber; 1980:225-263.
56. Bach-y-Rita P. Timing and organization of neurorehabilitation. Giornale Italiano di Medicina Riabilitativa. 1990;4:321-322.
57. Bayona NA, Bitensky J, Salter K, Teasell R. The role of task-specific training in rehabilitation therapies. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2005;12(3):58-65.
58. Wu C, Trombly CA, Lin K, Tickle-Degnen L. A kinematic study of contextual effects on reaching performance in persons with and without stroke: influences of object availability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81:95-101.
59. Wu C, Trombly CA, Lin K, Tickle-Degnen L. Effects of object affordances on reaching performance in persons with and without cerebrovascular accident. Am J Occup Ther. 1998;52:447-456.
60. Lin K, Wu C, Tickle-Degnen L, Coster W. Enhancing occupational performance through occupationally embedded exercise: a meta-analytic review. Occup Ther J Res 1997;17:25-47.
61. Carr J, Shepherd RB. Stroke Rehabilitation: Guidelines for Exercise and Training to Optimize Motor Skill. Oxford: Butterworth-Heineman Ltd; 2004:33-37.
62. Stockman IJ. Movement and Action in Learning and Development: Clinical Implications for Pervasive 'Developmental Disorders. San Diego: Elsevier Academic Press; 2004.
63. Rosenzweig M. Animal models for the effects of brain lesions and for rehabilitation. In: Bach-y-Rita P, ed. Recovery of Function: Theoretical Considerations for Brain Injury Rehabilitation. Bern, Switzerland: Hans Huber; 1980:127-172.
64. Hamm RJ, Temple MD, Buck DL, De Ford SM, Floyd CL. Cognitive recovery from traumatic brain injury: Results of posttraumatic experimental interventions. In: Levin HS, Grafman J, eds. Cerebral Reorganization of Function After Brain Damage. New York: Oxford University Press; 2000:49-67.